Does the vision extend to voting?
NZEET Project Director Rex Widerstrom pointed out that New
Zealanders can now enquire about their electoral enrolment
online, and download the forms needed to enrol. They can
use the NZGO site to search information on a variety of
government and departmental activities. "So why can't they
take the next logical step? Why can't they vote online in
referenda and polls, and maybe in the forthcoming
election? "If touchtone phone technology is taken into
account, then the vast majority of New Zealanders would be
able to access a private or public telephone and dial an
0800 number, or access the Internet, and cast a vote in a
referendum, a poll or an election. "We're not talking
about a new toy being used for the sake of novelty," Mr
Widerstrom said. "Imagine if the cost of running a
referendum came down to the cost of turning on the server
and designing an informative web site. With a much lower
cost, the justification for requiring a prohibitively high
number of signatures to trigger such a poll is gone.
Conversely, constituency MPs could, by restricting access
only to those identifiers that were registered as resident
in their electorate, be able to easily return to the people
who elected them for instruction and guidance.
"And
we're not talking about government by daily poll, either.
E-voting is simply another tool in the democratic process.
Several US states are moving toward it -- Washington state
has passed a law establishing a formal inquiry to set the
parameters; Florida is working on TCP/IP standards for
digital voting; California is looking into digital
signatures on petitions." "There's nothing to stop New
Zealand leading the world in running the first real trial
of e-voting, even this year. Hundreds of New Zealanders
signed up to participate with very little publicity having
been give the project," Mr Widerstrom explained. "Yet
approaches to all the registered political parties met with
little or no response, and endeavours to secure commercial
funding for the trial are taking far longer than
anticipated. Why is that? I suspect it is because those
political and business interests who could readily
implement such a project have realised that they stand to
lose the comfortable hold on power they have enjoyed till
now. "As e-democracy advocates in the States are
discovering, cheap and secure access to a powerful tool for
democracy means people start discounting the excuses
they've accepted up until now and demanding accountability.
And they realise that if they don't get it, those same
tools can be used to apply measures to enforce
accountability more than once every three years, like
recall. "The rhetoric of this announcement sounds good,
but it's hollow. Consulting with decision-makers by 2005?
If Mrs Shipley wants to consult the public on whether they
want e-voting now -- or indeed on any other issue -- we
will give her all the time she wants in a moderated chat
room on the NZEET site in the lead-up to November 27," Mr
Widerstrom pledged. "And if the government agreed to
support the Electoral Trial we could demonstrate to them
that a great deal more is also possible, right now. "And
a party which pledged to make themselves accountable --
really accountable -- through e- referenda, e-polling and
e-voting would surely win support from a great many New
Zealanders right across the spectrum. The challenge to Mrs
Shipley, Mr Williamson, and the decision-makers in the
other parties is to do it, not half heartedly by 2005, but
completely, right now. "The writing is not on the wall
for politicians who lack accountability. It's on a PC
screen near you." ends