Top Scoops

Book Reviews | Gordon Campbell | Scoop News | Wellington Scoop | Community Scoop | Search


UN Overwhelmed By Civilians In Danger

According to the United Nations there are now 40 million people uprooted by fighting worldwide but the UN can offer special care and legal protection to less than half. John Howard reports and comments.

On Thursday the UN Security Council was told that national sovereignty claims are being cited as reasons why the UN is unable to help 25 million people who are classifed as "internally displaced."

The African continent alone has 10 million people who do not come under the strict definition of "refugee" because while they have abandoned their homes, they have not crossed borders.

Fighting has prevented the UN and other aid agencies from reaching them and they often end up in isolated areas without food, water or shelter. Yet they are protected by the same Geneva Conventions that give refugees special status in countries of asylum.

In some areas, governments directly prevent aid from entering their country viewing civilians as allies of their enemies. Citing national sovereignty these government deliberately block the UN refugee agencies from entering.

China told the Security Council that international aid should be given "only on the basis of respect of sovereignty, territorial integrity and non-interference in internal affairs."

China consistently stresses the rights of countries to manage their affairs internally fearing international intervention in Tibet and Taiwan.

While the fine distinction between refugees and internally displaced is allowed to exist and national sovereignty issues are raised to prevent human suffering, I have a question to ask of our world leaders.

By what right do countries claim national sovereignty?

If a new island were thrown up from the sea by volcanic activity today, who could claim national sovereignty over it, and by what right?

Can these nations who now claim national sovereignty prove to the citizens of the world, and they are the ones who count, that they have absolute ownership over a piece of dirt? Or are they just claiming a radical title to the land through force or perception.

I'll bet these politicians have never asked their peoples.

So world leaders, if you claim national sovereignty which prevents aid reaching people, answer this simple question for the rest of the citizens of the world - Prove it?

© Scoop Media

Top Scoops Headlines


Scoop 3.0: A Global Vision And Future Focus

Joseph Cederwall: This final piece in the series will outline exactly what Scoop plans to do about this crisis in the coming months, and how we think we, and you, can help. More>>


Scoop Turns 19: Once More Unto The Breach!

Alastair Thompson writes: While the fairer intellectual disciplines Science, the Arts and Academia continue to be generously funded by Government, philanthropists and billionaires alike, Journalism of the routine kind - which has for three centuries provided the information infrastructure upon which a pluralist democracy is based - is fast disappearing in a fog of fake news. So then, this is Scoop’s call to arms... More>>


Lyndon Hood Satire: On Civility

Civility’s the prime virtue: it really can’t be beat / To fail to be pleasant is to court certain defeat. / I know that it requires restraint (they deal in hate, and fear) / But we shan’t get far – shall we? – if Civility’s not there! More>>

  • PublicAddress
  • Pundit
  • Kiwiblog