Top Scoops

Book Reviews | Gordon Campbell | Scoop News | Wellington Scoop | Community Scoop | Search


UN Overwhelmed By Civilians In Danger

According to the United Nations there are now 40 million people uprooted by fighting worldwide but the UN can offer special care and legal protection to less than half. John Howard reports and comments.

On Thursday the UN Security Council was told that national sovereignty claims are being cited as reasons why the UN is unable to help 25 million people who are classifed as "internally displaced."

The African continent alone has 10 million people who do not come under the strict definition of "refugee" because while they have abandoned their homes, they have not crossed borders.

Fighting has prevented the UN and other aid agencies from reaching them and they often end up in isolated areas without food, water or shelter. Yet they are protected by the same Geneva Conventions that give refugees special status in countries of asylum.

In some areas, governments directly prevent aid from entering their country viewing civilians as allies of their enemies. Citing national sovereignty these government deliberately block the UN refugee agencies from entering.

China told the Security Council that international aid should be given "only on the basis of respect of sovereignty, territorial integrity and non-interference in internal affairs."

China consistently stresses the rights of countries to manage their affairs internally fearing international intervention in Tibet and Taiwan.

While the fine distinction between refugees and internally displaced is allowed to exist and national sovereignty issues are raised to prevent human suffering, I have a question to ask of our world leaders.

By what right do countries claim national sovereignty?

If a new island were thrown up from the sea by volcanic activity today, who could claim national sovereignty over it, and by what right?

Can these nations who now claim national sovereignty prove to the citizens of the world, and they are the ones who count, that they have absolute ownership over a piece of dirt? Or are they just claiming a radical title to the land through force or perception.

I'll bet these politicians have never asked their peoples.

So world leaders, if you claim national sovereignty which prevents aid reaching people, answer this simple question for the rest of the citizens of the world - Prove it?

© Scoop Media

Top Scoops Headlines


Mediaversaries: 20 Years Of The Scoop Information Ecosystem

Scoop celebrates its 20th anniversary this month. To celebrate, we are offering 20% off all ScoopPro subscriptions, including the newly launched ScoopPro Citizen service for Citizen readers. More>>


Lyndon Hood: Better Analogies For National Pilfering Budget Data

After the Treasury Secretary's tragically doomed effort provide a metaphorical image for the budget data breach, and the rash of media attempts that followed, we never got an analogy that really covers all the bases. Until now. More>>


Resignation Of Metiria Turei: Were Journalists 'Just Doing Their Job'?

In our research we examined the role of journalism in animating the Turei controversy and the different perceptions of professional journalists and online commentators sympathetic to Turei’s left politics. ... More>>

Gordon Campbell: On The Extradition Of Julian Assange

It isn’t necessary to like Julian Assange to think that his extradition to the US (on the charge of aiding and abetting Chelsea Manning) would be a major injustice... More>>


  • PublicAddress
  • Pundit
  • Kiwiblog