Top Scoops

Book Reviews | Gordon Campbell | Scoop News | Wellington Scoop | Community Scoop | Search

 

Scoop Opinion: Carparking Tax Mooted

Transport Minister, Mark Gosche, is calling for more government funding for public transport and says he's determined to make it a priority. But why isn't government following the New South Wales example. John Howard writes.

Mark Gosche is launching a push to ease traffic congestion particularly in Auckland which some say, on present growth, is an unsustainable city.

Mr Gosche says the government has budgeted for both improving public transport services and roading. He says he will be turning his attention to Wellington and Christchurch next.

On Friday, Auckland City Council hosted the Labour 'Auckland Caucus' which included Mr Gosche and the Minister assisting the Prime Minister on Auckland Issues, Judith Tizard.

Top of the agenda was public transport with councillors also providing briefings on water, wastewater and social infrastructure including affordable housing and participation in the knowledge economy.

Auckland Deputy Mayor, Bruce Hucker said, " Government's commitment to Auckland has never been stronger, so we're taking this opportunity to develop close partnership across a range of issues."

Mr Hucker said, "No one authority can do it alone when it comes to the infrastructure we need. The key lies in Auckland City, the local authorities of the region, and central Government working together."

But why should the general taxpayer fund Auckland for its public transport problems particularly when the Auckland region is said to be the country's fastest-growing region and presumably, with good management, would have the funds, or the ability to obtain them and repay them, to invest in transport and infrastructure.

There are other areas of New Zealand who have no public transport between towns and hospitals at all.

Travelling to hospital 38 kilometres away on an urgent matter and having to negotiate two single-lane road rail bridges along the way, is something most people in the city's would be unlikely to comprehend.

There is a better way to fund public transport and ease traffic congestion and pollution and NSW has latched on to it.

Each owner of a vehicle who has a permanent private carpark in Sydney pays A$800 tax each year for the privilege. That's over and above the carparking fees. The money is designated to fund public transport and extensions to it.

In the outer city's surrounding Sydney the amount is A$400 per annum.

The rationale the NSW Government used was that if you want the privilege of driving to work, parking your vehicle in your own permanent carpark, and therefore contributing to traffic congestion and pollution, as well as using up precious fuel resources, then you should pay for that privilege.

The records of the carparking buildings are scrupulously checked against the cars in the permanent carparks and they are enforced. It appears there's not much chance of beating the system.

No tax is paid by the casual visitor or shopper who uses street or public car-parking on a daily basis so it doesn't affect business.

And who can argue with that?

In this instance, Mr Gosche is wrong to want general taxpayer money to fund a traffic congestion and pollution problem specific to the growing city's. It is solvable by other means and mechanisms.


© Scoop Media

 
 
 
Top Scoops Headlines

 

Veronika Meduna on The Dig: Kaitiakitanga - Seeing Nature As Your Elder

The intricate interconnections between climate change and biodiversity loss, and how this disruption impacts Māori in particular. More>>

ALSO:

Gordon Campbell: On China And Hong Kong (And Boris)

In the circumstances, yesterday’s move by Lam to scrap – rather than merely suspend – the hated extradition law that first triggered the protests three months ago, seems like the least she can do. It may also be too little, too late. More>>

ALSO:

Gordon Campbell: On Ensuring Boris Gets Blamed For Brexit

Everyone needs to step back and let Johnson have his ‘no deal’ Brexit, since that’s the only way of making sure that the current Tory leadership gets to wear the consequent turmoil. More>>

ALSO:

Dave Hansford on The Dig: Whose Biodiversity Is It Anyway?

The DOC-led draft Biodiversity Strategy seeks a “shared vision.” But there are more values and views around wildlife than there are species. How can we hope to agree on the shape of Aotearoa’s future biota? More>>

ALSO:

There Is A Field: Reimagining Biodiversity In Aotearoa

We are in a moment of existential peril, with interconnected climate and biodiversity crises converging on a global scale to drive most life on Earth to the brink of extinction… These massive challenges can, however, be reframed as a once in a lifetime opportunity to fundamentally change how humanity relates to nature and to each other. Read on The Dig>>

ALSO: