Top Scoops

Book Reviews | Gordon Campbell | Scoop News | Wellington Scoop | Community Scoop | Search

 

David Miller Online: The USS Cole attack

David Miller Online

The USS Cole attack: A caution against overstating International Terrorism in the 21st Century.

While much of the world’s attention has been focused on the crisis in the Middle East and the change of government in Yugoslavia over the past week, the attack on the USS Cole while on a refuelling stop in Aden has once again thrown the spotlight on International Terrorism.

However, with the Israeli- Palestinian peace process at near breaking point and the transition of government in Belgrade, one could almost be excused for overlooking this event and the fact that terrorism remains a factor in international politics in the 21st Century.

While there have been no claims of responsibility for the bombing of the Cole, in which 17 US servicemen were killed, Washington is adamant that the suicide bombing of its warship was the work of a terrorist group and has already indicated that it believes the network of Osama bin- Laden to be that which orchestrated it.

Until evidence to substantiate these claims is produced, this position remains speculation, nevertheless the attack serves as a demonstration of America’s ongoing and growing fixation with terrorism and with bin- Laden, who to many Americans is its embodiment in the new Millennium.

This is not the first time the United States has held the Saudi born bin- Laden and his organisation, known as al- Qaida, responsible for attacks on its military and people.

Bin- Laden is accused by Washington of planning and organising the 1998 bombings of its embassies in Kenya and Tanzania in which over 300 people were killed and more than 5000 were wounded. The attack on the US air force barracks in Saudi Arabia in 1996 was also attributed to this group as where attacks on US servicemen and installations in Somalia and previously in Aden.



What arises from such attacks, including the Cole incident, is that the attention directed towards bin- Laden within the United States heightens and this adds weight to the argument that he is the terrorist mastermind of the 21st Century.

This perception has become an official government line.

State Department documents acknowledge that the al- Qaida organisation has a global reach and is privately funded through bin- Laden himself. They point to the fact that the strength of the group is not known.

There is speculation that from his base in Afghanistan, Bin- Laden could have between several hundred to several thousand members under his command, which he can call upon to conduct his operations. The United States also maintains that this group is developing chemical and biological agents for their arsenal.

Such a fear was the motivation for the cruise missile attack the US launched on a pharmaceutical plant in Sudan, which it maintained was a weapons manufacturing plant under the control of bin- Laden in 1998.

Therefore the most significant aspect that arises from the attack on the Cole is that this recent incident is one in a series, which further adds to the American position that such attacks show the rise of a ‘new terrorism’. This new brand of terrorism is regarded as being a more lethal brand than what has emerged in previous decades and has arisen throughout the 1990’s.

It is regarded within the American media and government in particular as being constituted by the emergence of religion as the predominant impetus for terrorist attack and the increasing technological skills that terrorist groups can call upon.

The potential for the use of biological, chemical and even nuclear agents is also included in this equation along with the role states such as Iran, Afghanistan and Pakistan play in sponsoring and aiding terrorist groups.

It must be noted that the ‘new terrorism’ premise and what is believed to constitute has been the subject of intense debate and criticism, however it is upon this formula that a widespread perception of terrorism has formed and why so much attention continues to be focused on it.

However to overstate the power of terrorism is a dangerous thing to do. It is important to remember that terrorism is not a leading cause of death and injury among American and Western people, in fact, the number of casualties it inflicted during the 1990’s was a marked drop from those in previous decades.

For all the speculation of chemical or biological attack, there has been no copycat incidents following the 1996 Tokyo Subway incident in which sarin nerve gas was released, and governments such as the United States have been guilty of inflating the power of the terrorists to a point which is sometimes divorced from reality.

The mystique that already surrounds Osama bin- Laden is already well developed and continues to be whenever Washington or one of its allies openly remarks that his organisation is a prime suspect for an attack. It must be remembered that this is a man who in no way has the means to influence the foreign policy of the world’s remaining superpower, despite his stated wish to do so.

Nevertheless with each incident and subsequent American media and government attention the aura around him grows. It is not ironic therefore, that President Clinton has signed two Executive Orders relating to bin- Laden and the Afghanistan’s Taliban militia, which provide him a sanctuary and that the US regards any statements he makes with the utmost seriousness.

Terrorism has been in existence for centuries and the Cole attack shows that this century will be no different. However in this century the forces that shape terrorism have changed somewhat.

Given the explosion of violence in the Middle East, the turmoil of Yugoslavia and the recent outbreak of the Ebola virus in Uganda, there are other areas of concern for people and policymakers to think about. When placed against this broader backdrop of global events, terrorism and those responsible for it are merely small players in a very large arena.


© Scoop Media

 
 
 
Top Scoops Headlines

 

Gordon Campbell: On The Anti-Corbyn Split In British Labour

The resignation of seven UK Labour MPs in protest against the leadership of Jeremy Corbyn is another example of the centre-left’s readiness to sabotage its own cause... More>>

Scoop 3.0 Update & Membership Sale: The End Of ‘Objectivity’ In Journalism

2019 looks like it might well be another really bad, terrible, not so good year for the traditional journalism model globally... on the positive side, smaller independent players with innovative digital models and a more open approach like our ScoopPro service look likely to be more relevant than ever. More>>

ALSO:

Gordon Campbell: On America’s ‘Green New Deal’

‘Socialism’ is more of a political scare word than an objective condition. Even in the US, as Nate Silver’s 538 website pointed out this week there is polling evidence that modern Americans are inclined to treat socialism as meaning ‘equality’ rather than the ‘government ownership or control’ that Americans understood the term to mean back in the 1940s... More>>

Gordon Campbell: On Listening To Ocasio-Cortez About Tax

In its attitudes to tax, New Zealand has been the last colonial outpost of Thatcherism. Change, however, may be in the air. More>>

ALSO:

Gordon Campbell: On The Nelson Fire And Climate Change

The Nelson fire has been a useful warning of things to come, given how climate change will (a) increase the likelihood of reduced rainfall and drought-like conditions in many parts of New Zealand, which – obviously – will raise (b) the fire danger and (c) the cost of providing the communities at risk with the enhanced firefighting capabilities that they’re going to need. More>>

ALSO: