Top Scoops

Book Reviews | Gordon Campbell | Scoop News | Wellington Scoop | Community Scoop | Search

 

US Campaign Funding A “Protection Racket”

Three hundred of America's top executives from major companies have spoken out in a CBS news-poll over US politicians shaking them down for big campaign bucks. In some quarters it's being described as a well-oiled protection racket. John Howard reports.

Running an election campaign anywhere today takes big money - more so if it's for a candidate for US President or Congress.

Over the last 18 months more than $US1.6 billion has been raised by candidates, parties and other political groups involved in the November 7 US presidential and congressional elections.

Almost half of the $1.6 billion came from big corporations and some of them aren't happy about being squeezed.

It's not the business leaders rushing to give money to the politicians, it's the politicians shaking down the business leaders.

Charles Kolb, who heads a business group filled with corporate heavies says, " Many of our people have used the word shakedown. That's how they feel when they get the calls demanding these big dollars."

The CBS poll reveals that 54 percent of corporate executives believe the reason big business gives to politicians is to, "avoid adverse legislative consequences", or to, "buy access to influence", legislation.

But corporate leaders also say the system is broken, it needs to be reformed, they are afraid of the spite of politicians if they don't give, and most of them would like to get out of the system.

What really has the executives in an uproar is not just that politicians now routinely ask for tens of thousands of dollars at a time, but the image of corporate America is consistently being tarnished because of it.

In New Zealand, eyebrows were raised earlier this year when it was revealed that some companies had made significant financial contributions to political parties.


© Scoop Media

 
 
 
Top Scoops Headlines

 

Gordon Campbell: On The Barriers Facing Female Politicians

On the current evidence though, voters are less likely to regard a female politician as ‘likeable’ than a male one, and – even worse – this perception tends to become a barrier that only female candidates in the main, have to face. More>>

The Detail: Britain's Trump Is Now Its Prime Minister

Guardian journalist James Murray says Boris Johnson wears the hat that works, depending on what he’s trying to achieve. More>>

ALSO:

Gordon Campbell: On Trump’s Open White Nationalism

By telling those four elected, American born and/or raised women of colour to “go home”, US President Donald Trump’s racist agenda has come out of the shadows. More>>

ALSO:

Mediaversaries: 20 Years Of The Scoop Information Ecosystem

Scoop celebrates its 20th anniversary this month. To celebrate, we are offering 20% off all ScoopPro subscriptions, including the newly launched ScoopPro Citizen service for Citizen readers. More>>

ALSO: