Book Reviews | Gordon Campbell | News Flashes | Scoop Features | Scoop Video | Strange & Bizarre | Search


US Elections: What is Letting Democracy Down

David Miller Online. The US Presidential Elections: What is Letting Democracy Down.

For many people the situation following the United States Presidential race has been marked by a sense of bewilderment as to why a week later there still is no decisive outcome from the vote. For others there is a sense of frustration at the ongoing delays and recounts and towards the lawsuits now being filed concerning the results in certain parts of the country. For the rest, boredom is beginning to set in. After a year of primaries to select each party’s candidates, endless campaigning, televised debates and last Tuesday’s vote, which candidate will be the next President is still not known.

The 2000 Presidential election has shown Americans that the course of democracy does not always run along a smooth path. This is highlighted by the fact that in the national popular vote Democratic candidate and Vice President Al Gore is ahead of Republican rival and Texas Governor George W. Bush, who in turn has won more states than Mr Gore in the Electoral College. It is however, the Electoral College process, which will decide the 43rd President depending upon which candidate emerges from this debacle with the most votes.

The United States government and people have always placed the value of democracy above all others. Throughout American history this has been cherished, with the principles of the freedom of speech and one- man one- vote being the cornerstones upon which the nation was built. However to those who believe that for democracy to function one candidate must receive more votes than their opponent to be the victor then the process in the United States has fallen short.

The Electoral College is a complicated system and the element to the US political structure that has come under criticism and scrutiny amidst the debacle that has followed last Tuesday’s vote. The Electoral College system was established during the founding of the United States and is enshrined in Article 2 of the Constitution. It is comprised of a body of electors from each state equal in number to that of the total representatives each state has in Congress, plus two. Hence a state with two representatives gains four College votes, while a state with twenty- three representatives gains twenty- five votes. Once the votes are counted throughout each state on a plurality basis, the Electoral College votes are then cast in favour of a particular candidate based on that result. This could not only allow Mr Bush to win the Electoral College, despite being second in the national popular vote, but also tends to over- represent the less populated states. It is unlikely, even amidst the growing chorus of those calling for this system to be reformed that it will be changed, as it is unlikely that the smaller states will want to relinquish the disproportionate power this allows them.

Until this election, the people of the United States have remained content with the system they have in electing their political leaders. Not since John F. Kennedy’s narrow victory over Richard Nixon in 1960 has there been such uncertainty in a Presidential election outcome. Over the past three decades the successful candidate was known before the final count was completed and this complacency among the American voters has meant that there has been little reason to question the electoral system. However Americans have been shaken from this complacency due the events of the past week and now do not appear so content with the process by which their leaders are elected. This is even reached the point of asking whether democracy in the United States is flawed.

Democracy in the United States is not flawed due to the nature of this election. No system, which claims to be democratic, will satisfy all of those who are eligible to vote and will be open to criticism at some level. In any system, such as that in the United States, the Westminster system or the proportional representation process adopted by New Zealand, voter dissatisfaction at the result and irregularities will feature. This does not mean that the system is defective or that democracy has failed. What is letting Americans down is the threat of legal action that now hangs over the ballot and the possibility that even after the result of the recounting is known, neither candidate will admit defeat. Such actions on the part of either candidate can only lead to further instability for the country and widen the partisan divide.

Perhaps it is time that the Electoral College system was reviewed and altered to reflect the results of the nationwide ballot, and it will be another four years before those voters who claim to have voted incorrectly due to the butterfly style ballot paper will have a chance to rectify their error, but the fact that it is increasingly likely that the courts will decide who follows Bill Clinton into the White House is what will let democracy in the United States down.

As one observer in the United States put it, “the outcome is that half of the electorate will end up feeling happy, but with a bad taste in their mouths, and the other half will be unhappy with a bad taste in their mouths”. Whatever the result due to the actions of the candidates and their campaigns over the past week, those feeling unhappy are growing in numbers and as a result democracy has suffered a loss of faith in the United States.

© Scoop Media

Top Scoops Headlines


Werewolf: Living With Rio’s Olympic Ruins

Mariana Cavalcanti Critics of the Olympic project can point a discernible pattern in the delivery of Olympics-related urban interventions: the belated but rushed inaugurations of faulty and/or unfinished infrastructures... More>>

Live Blog On Now: Open Source//Open Society Conference

The second annual Open Source Open Society Conference is a 2 day event taking place on 22-23 August 2016 at Michael Fowler Centre in Wellington… Scoop is hosting a live blog summarising the key points of this exciting conference. More>>



Gordon Campbell: On The Politicising Of The War On Drugs In Sport

It hasn’t been much fun at all to see how “war on drugs in sport” has become a proxy version of the Cold War, fixated on Russia. This weekend’s banning of the Russian long jumper Darya Klishina took that fixation to fresh extremes. More>>


Binoy Kampmark: Kevin Rudd’s Failed UN Secretary General Bid

Few sights are sadder in international diplomacy than seeing an aging figure desperate for honours. In a desperate effort to net them, he scurries around, cultivating, prodding, wishing to be noted. Finally, such an honour is netted, in all likelihood just to shut that overly keen individual up. More>>

Open Source / Open Society: The Scoop Foundation - An Open Model For NZ Media

Access to accurate, relevant and timely information is a crucial aspect of an open and transparent society. However, in our digital society information is in a state of flux with every aspect of its creation, delivery and consumption undergoing profound redefinition... More>>

Keeping Out The Vote: Gordon Campbell On The US Elections

I’ll focus here on just two ways that dis-enfranchisement is currently occurring in the US: (a) by the rigging of the boundary lines for voter districts and (b) by demanding elaborate photo IDs before people are allowed to cast their vote. More>>

Ramzy Baroud: Being Black Palestinian - Solidarity As A Welcome Pathology

It should come as no surprise that the loudest international solidarity that accompanied the continued spate of the killing of Black Americans comes from Palestine; that books have already been written and published by Palestinians about the plight of their Black brethren. In fact, that solidarity is mutual. More>>


Get More From Scoop

Top Scoops
Search Scoop  
Powered by Vodafone
NZ independent news