Book Reviews | Gordon Campbell | News Flashes | Scoop Features | Scoop Video | Strange & Bizarre | Search


David Miller: Is This the Start of a New Cold War?

National Missile Defence: Is This the Start of a New Cold War?

Even though the Cold War ended over a decade ago, the issues of ballistic missiles and weapons proliferation have continued to gather momentum. The United States government has frequently expressed its concern at such issues and has made no secret that it regards these missiles as a threat to its national security. Given this on- going concern, it comes as no surprise that alarm bells are bringing in Washington over reports that Russia is planning on sell arms to Iran, a country considered a danger to US interests in the Middle East and the stability of the region since the revolution in 1979. If these reports are found to be accurate, then it becomes increasingly likely that the incoming Bush Administration will press ahead with the controversial National Missile Defence programme that has been set in place by President Clinton. This is a programme, which opponents say could lead to a Cold War style arms race in the 21st century.

The National Missile Defence programme, (NMD), stems from the United States perception that while the end of the Cold War reduced the likelihood of a global conflict, the threat from foreign missiles has grown due to increased world-wide proliferation of technology. The US believes that incoming ballistic missiles have the potential to not only carry a chemical or nuclear warhead into US territory, but they threaten their interests and military deployments overseas, as well as the security of allied countries. In its defence of NMD Washington points to six regional conflicts since 1980 in which such weapons where used. With the development of new technology and its proliferation throughout the world, ballistic missiles can be delivered from various launch platforms, including submarine, aircraft, or even mobile devices such as a truck.

The NMD will be controlled from Alaska, and designed to deflect any attack made by what the United States regards as “rogue states”, such as North Korea, Iran and Iraq. North Korea has developed two types of ballistic missile as part of its Rodong programme. The latter type now has the range with which it can over-fly Japan and the testing of the missile caused alarm bells to ring in Tokyo, an important American ally in Northeast Asia. Added into this concern is that these missiles are reported to be capable of carrying weapons of mass destruction and North Korea has throughout the 1990’s been suspected of trying to develop a nuclear weapons programme.

Iraq is another state, which the US regards as being rogue. The Iraqi Scud class of missile was a much talked about element of the 1991 Gulf War and has been the subject of ongoing clashes between Baghdad, the United Nations and the US and Britain ever since Operation Desert Strom ended. Iraq claims that it has destroyed all offensive missile capabilities in accordance with the UN Resolutions but as UN inspectors are not able to visit sites in the country this cannot be accurately confirmed.

Iran is perhaps the principle country of concern for the US out of the three. Iran is believed to have purchased medium range missiles from the North Koreans as well as developing its own programme that may involve longer- range missiles that could reach targets in Western Europe. US – Iranian have remained tense since the Islamic Revolution in 1979. Along with the several incidents that have occurred between the two countries, such as the US embassy takeover and continued tension in the Persian Gulf, relations have remained extremely cold. Only in the past two years with a more moderate Iranian regime in power has there been a thaw.

Reports of possible Russian arms and weapons technology transfers to Iran will no doubt raise concern on this matter even further. It is ironic that the Russians themselves have spoken out against NMD. They have proposed a jointly built missile shield and have warned that they will not drop their opposition to the American plan to build a screen saying it violates arms control agreements already in place between the former Cold War rivals. Moscow has labelled the US concerns over the threat of missile attack by rogue states as being exaggerated and Prime Minister Vladimir Putin has vowed to scrap all arms control agreements with Washington if NMD goes ahead.

Hence the concern that NMD could trigger a new arms race, especially as China has also expressed vigorous opposition to the plan saying that it will alter the international strategic balance. Russia might accept NMD if the United States agrees to cut back its offensive capability in accordance with improved defence mechanisms, thus restoring the strategic balance.

With the election of George W. Bush to the White House it is likely that NMD will go ahead. During his election campaign he vowed to work on implementing the $60 billion system, even if it meant violating the landmark 1972 Anti- Ballistic Missile Treaty and subsequent accords. This should come as no surprise. Weapons of mass destruction and the growing capabilities of “rogue states” have been recurring themes in US foreign and defence policy since the end of the Cold War and the United States has come to view the world as becoming less stable. The triumph of the Cold War has given way to increased anxiety over low- level threats and possible attack and such concerns have filled the threat vacuum created by the collapse of the Soviet Union and Eastern Bloc. Only domestic budgetary constraints appear likely to halt NMD and all its implications. Maybe the Cold War wasn’t so bad after all.

© Scoop Media

Top Scoops Headlines


Werewolf: Living With Rio’s Olympic Ruins

Mariana Cavalcanti Critics of the Olympic project can point a discernible pattern in the delivery of Olympics-related urban interventions: the belated but rushed inaugurations of faulty and/or unfinished infrastructures... More>>

Live Blog On Now: Open Source//Open Society Conference

The second annual Open Source Open Society Conference is a 2 day event taking place on 22-23 August 2016 at Michael Fowler Centre in Wellington… Scoop is hosting a live blog summarising the key points of this exciting conference. More>>



Gordon Campbell: On The Politicising Of The War On Drugs In Sport

It hasn’t been much fun at all to see how “war on drugs in sport” has become a proxy version of the Cold War, fixated on Russia. This weekend’s banning of the Russian long jumper Darya Klishina took that fixation to fresh extremes. More>>


Binoy Kampmark: Kevin Rudd’s Failed UN Secretary General Bid

Few sights are sadder in international diplomacy than seeing an aging figure desperate for honours. In a desperate effort to net them, he scurries around, cultivating, prodding, wishing to be noted. Finally, such an honour is netted, in all likelihood just to shut that overly keen individual up. More>>

Open Source / Open Society: The Scoop Foundation - An Open Model For NZ Media

Access to accurate, relevant and timely information is a crucial aspect of an open and transparent society. However, in our digital society information is in a state of flux with every aspect of its creation, delivery and consumption undergoing profound redefinition... More>>

Keeping Out The Vote: Gordon Campbell On The US Elections

I’ll focus here on just two ways that dis-enfranchisement is currently occurring in the US: (a) by the rigging of the boundary lines for voter districts and (b) by demanding elaborate photo IDs before people are allowed to cast their vote. More>>

Ramzy Baroud: Being Black Palestinian - Solidarity As A Welcome Pathology

It should come as no surprise that the loudest international solidarity that accompanied the continued spate of the killing of Black Americans comes from Palestine; that books have already been written and published by Palestinians about the plight of their Black brethren. In fact, that solidarity is mutual. More>>


Get More From Scoop

Top Scoops
Search Scoop  
Powered by Vodafone
NZ independent news