Book Reviews | Gordon Campbell | News Flashes | Scoop Features | Scoop Video | Strange & Bizarre | Search


Howard's End: We Are Not All The Same

The echo of protests from Seattle to Prague and now Davos over globalisation has prompted some Scoop readers to ask in their recent emails; what is the definition of globalisation, or is there one? John Howard tries to answer.

Many small nations are now saying that colonisation was usage of power by strong nations over weaker ones, while globalisation is the use of power by multinationals and nations against the weaker.

Globalisation can perhaps be characterised as having three main points. (a) market facilitation of unrestricted flows of capital, labour and information around the world (b) the identification of level playing fields or sameness and (c) development meaning increased productivity.

It appears globalisation became a set objective of US foreign policy some eight years ago with the architects of international trade and investment promising growth and development for the world.

Since then, criticism in the international forums has always been that globalisation idealised and promoted Anglo-American-style capitalism. Critics say that style does not suit the vast majority of the nations in the world.

For example, the Western way of thinking seems to be that there is a solution for everything, while many other nations and cultures see dialogue, without preconditions of a conclusion, leading to a solution.

In other words, localisation which recognised cultural obligations of give, receive and give in return on a local basis - identification of diversity or difference and development being seen as an exercise in identity building.

To illustrate, in the Pacific both Nuie and the Cook Islands operate what the West defines as tax havens. Last week the US banking system imposed a ban on sending US dollars to Niue for fear that it was involved in money laundering. The Cook Islands fear the same thing might happen to them.

But there are no similar restrictions placed on many other larger countries also alleged to be involved in money laundering.

What this means is that small nations are vulnerable and appear to be of no consequence when it comes to combating the adverse effects of globalisation.

The same can apply with food prices. Because of globalisation, the price of food in a large country now affects the price paid in, say, Rarotonga. The larger countries also subsidise their producers to the tune of billions of dollars.

Effectively, globalisation is actually preventing small countries from improving the quality of life for their people.

Right now they are lost in a bigger world but they can't sit idly by while the rest of the world moves on. That would only invite disaster. Perhaps we can now understand why many smaller nations don't want Western restrictions relating to the environment and labour laws placed in international agreements which will affect their ability to survive.

Then there's globalised security. Pacific leaders are now saying that if the US moves ahead with its National Missile Defence System which would be able to shoot down incoming balistic missiles as far from the US as possible, then what happens to them?

It's known that if such a system became operational, it would be directed at North Korea. The interception point of the incoming missile, and the nuclear warhead fallout and falling debris, would be over the North Pacific nations.

The fallout would be an unintended consequence but it would be a consequence nevertheless.

The US has not signed the protocols of the South Pacific Nuclear Free Zone treaty despite indicating several years ago that it would. It has so far side-stepped that worry of Pacific leaders.

The uneven distribution of wealth and power which comes from globalisation points to a potential loss of meaningful decision-making and control over their own economy by the small nations.

Like New Zealand, they are becoming more subject to global forces such as multinational companies and the pressures of the select global brotherhood of the larger nations.

Globalisation and perhaps even the push for exclusive bilateral trade deals between two countries, is good for some but not for others, because we now have value systems between large and small nations that are incompatible with each other.

The original globalisation forums tried to teach businessmen the "new capitalism" of the US and Britain. Now, the forums are trying to persuade people of the merits of values associated with the old European-style social capitalism. Either way, the incompatibility between large and small nations and cultures remains. Clearly, we are not all the same.

© Scoop Media

Top Scoops Headlines


Julien Troussier: Loving Trump

It’s 3am. Cannot sleep. Restless. Slide to unlock. Open the New York Times App. Look for the latest incident. He did it again. He lashed out. Fear. Anger. Outrage. I needed to see this. I needed to check that the madness was still there. More>>


Werewolf: Living With Rio’s Olympic Ruins

Mariana Cavalcanti Critics of the Olympic project can point a discernible pattern in the delivery of Olympics-related urban interventions: the belated but rushed inaugurations of faulty and/or unfinished infrastructures... More>>

Gordon Campbell: On The Politicising Of The War On Drugs In Sport

It hasn’t been much fun at all to see how “war on drugs in sport” has become a proxy version of the Cold War, fixated on Russia. This weekend’s banning of the Russian long jumper Darya Klishina took that fixation to fresh extremes. More>>


Keeping Out The Vote: Gordon Campbell On The US Elections

I’ll focus here on just two ways that dis-enfranchisement is currently occurring in the US: (a) by the rigging of the boundary lines for voter districts and (b) by demanding elaborate photo IDs before people are allowed to cast their vote. More>>

Live Blog: Open Source//Open Society Conference

The second annual Open Source Open Society Conference is a 2 day event taking place on 22-23 August 2016 at Michael Fowler Centre in Wellington… Scoop is hosting a live blog summarising the key points of this exciting conference. More>>


Open Source / Open Society: The Scoop Foundation - An Open Model For NZ Media

Access to accurate, relevant and timely information is a crucial aspect of an open and transparent society. However, in our digital society information is in a state of flux with every aspect of its creation, delivery and consumption undergoing profound redefinition... More>>

Ramzy Baroud: Being Black Palestinian - Solidarity As A Welcome Pathology

It should come as no surprise that the loudest international solidarity that accompanied the continued spate of the killing of Black Americans comes from Palestine; that books have already been written and published by Palestinians about the plight of their Black brethren. In fact, that solidarity is mutual. More>>


Get More From Scoop

Top Scoops
Search Scoop  
Powered by Vodafone
NZ independent news