Book Reviews | Gordon Campbell | News Flashes | Scoop Features | Scoop Video | Strange & Bizarre | Search

 


David Miller: The Bombing of Iraq

The Bombing of Iraq, Why the US and Britain Persist With This Policy.

It was interesting to see that the New Zealand government has criticised the United States and Britain for their renewed air offensive over the skies of Iraq, with Disarmament Minister Matt Robson labelling them an “arrogant use of power”. The government has questioned the military action of the two allies claiming that this latest round of bombing will only serve to strengthen the cause of Iraqi leader Saddam Hussein by allowing him to further gather sympathy throughout the world for his country. The government also maintains that Saddam will use the air strikes in his bid to have the sanctions lifted, pointing to the continued suffering of his people. This synopsis is correct, but given the position the US and Britain have put themselves in since the end of Desert Storm, what other course of action is open to them with an enemy who they defeated on the battlefield but have far from vanquished?

The United States and Britain are in a difficult position when dealing with Iraq to say the least. First, the sanctions over which they launch their bombers have failed to remove Saddam from power ten years after the Liberation of Kuwait. They have failed to prevent United Nations weapons inspectors from being allowed to return to the country and oversee the decommissioning of Iraq’s weapons of mass destruction programme and they have become an issue of debate as to whether they are humanitarian and effective as a tool in foreign policy. While the US and Britain have no doubt addressed both sides to this debate they have nevertheless made it their policy to enforce the sanctions through military means if necessary and this has led to them becoming increasingly isolated over their actions.

The bombing raids at the weekend have led a to a worldwide chorus of criticism. As with actions in the past, Russia and China immediately spoke out against the strikes, claiming they undermine stability in the region as did several Middle East states. However this time the concern from within NATO Europe appeared to be somewhat louder than before. France complained that it had still not received an explanation for Operation Desert Fox two years ago and the governments of Turkey, from which the planes where launched and Spain complained about the lack of consultation.

Wellington, for its part, claimed that the bombing undermined world peace initiatives and efforts to get the decade long sanctions against Iraq lifted. Mr Robson said that undermining the efforts for sanctions lifting is what is motivating the US and that Washington aims to create a climate in which it is easier to establish the controversial National Missile Defence programme, also known as Star Wars.

The debate over the sanctions stems from the effects they have had on the civilian population. While they where put in place to punish Saddam it is the citizens of Iraq that have suffered instead, and the result has been a humanitarian crisis. UNICEF has reported that Iraqi infant mortality rates have doubled over the past decade and Denis Halladay, a former assistant UN secretary general has labelled them as being ‘genocide’.

This statement is rather extreme and lays the blame for the situation in Iraq squarely with the allies and the UN. The US and Britain maintain that the Iraqi regime has manipulated the effects of the crisis for its own survival and has little concern for the plight of its people except when trying to gain international support for its position. There is the charge that Iraq only accepted the oil-for-food program in 1997, six years after the policy was established by the United Nations. By this stage the humanitarian crisis had reached its worst levels. Iraq also insisted on receiving all revenue payments in euros rather than dollars and while making a political statement about the dollar cost itself several hundred million dollars in the process.

So what is the answer to this particular Middle East stalemate? This is a question that must be answered by the New Zealand government if it is to come out and support the lifting of sanctions. Mr Robson is correct in saying that the bombing jeopardises the search for a solution, however perhaps he could make it clear as to what kind of solution the government favours. If this is done then maybe there can be progress made towards resolution.

In the meantime, the future course for this ongoing tension over Iraq will continue to be characterised by stalemate and contradiction. Economic sanctions are useful for bringing a regime to the negotiating table, as was the case with former Yugoslav president Slobodan Milosevic but they do not work as an ambitious foreign policy tool such as toppling a regime and they have clearly failed in this case.

However the fact of the matter is that there will be no resolution to this ongoing situation or lifting of sanctions without a dramatic reversal of policy by Washington and London. The fall of Saddam Hussein from the Iraqi presidency or at very least his full compliance with the UN would precipitate this and put an end to allied air operations, but this is not likely to happen. It would become a glaring defeat for the Iraqi leader to accept this course of action and the allies will not back down as they do not wish to show that their policies where flawed and that Saddam has triumphed over them. As neither is likely to happen in the immediate future, the sanctions and bombing will therefore continue, as in lieu of a withdrawal this remains the only path open to Britain and the US in their increasingly difficult position.

Footnote. New Zealand has a Disarmament Minister, but could someone please email and remind me just what we own that could be possibly be disarmed?

© Scoop Media

 
 
 
 
 
Top Scoops Headlines

 

Werewolf: Living With Rio’s Olympic Ruins

Mariana Cavalcanti Critics of the Olympic project can point a discernible pattern in the delivery of Olympics-related urban interventions: the belated but rushed inaugurations of faulty and/or unfinished infrastructures... More>>

Live Blog On Now: Open Source//Open Society Conference

The second annual Open Source Open Society Conference is a 2 day event taking place on 22-23 August 2016 at Michael Fowler Centre in Wellington… Scoop is hosting a live blog summarising the key points of this exciting conference. More>>

ALSO:

Buildup:

Gordon Campbell: On The Politicising Of The War On Drugs In Sport

It hasn’t been much fun at all to see how “war on drugs in sport” has become a proxy version of the Cold War, fixated on Russia. This weekend’s banning of the Russian long jumper Darya Klishina took that fixation to fresh extremes. More>>

ALSO:

Binoy Kampmark: Kevin Rudd’s Failed UN Secretary General Bid

Few sights are sadder in international diplomacy than seeing an aging figure desperate for honours. In a desperate effort to net them, he scurries around, cultivating, prodding, wishing to be noted. Finally, such an honour is netted, in all likelihood just to shut that overly keen individual up. More>>

Open Source / Open Society: The Scoop Foundation - An Open Model For NZ Media

Access to accurate, relevant and timely information is a crucial aspect of an open and transparent society. However, in our digital society information is in a state of flux with every aspect of its creation, delivery and consumption undergoing profound redefinition... More>>

Keeping Out The Vote: Gordon Campbell On The US Elections

I’ll focus here on just two ways that dis-enfranchisement is currently occurring in the US: (a) by the rigging of the boundary lines for voter districts and (b) by demanding elaborate photo IDs before people are allowed to cast their vote. More>>

Ramzy Baroud: Being Black Palestinian - Solidarity As A Welcome Pathology

It should come as no surprise that the loudest international solidarity that accompanied the continued spate of the killing of Black Americans comes from Palestine; that books have already been written and published by Palestinians about the plight of their Black brethren. In fact, that solidarity is mutual. More>>

ALSO:


Get More From Scoop

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Top Scoops
Search Scoop  
 
 
Powered by Vodafone
NZ independent news