Top Scoops

Book Reviews | Gordon Campbell | Scoop News | Wellington Scoop | Community Scoop | Search


SCP HOUSE: Spouse House Stoush - Mallard Apology

SCP HOUSE: Mallard Apologises In Spouse House Stoush

This is a paraphrased account of Mr Mallard’s apology and is not a transcript of what was said in the house. The official record of Parliamentary proceedings is Hansard, which is not finalised till some days after the event.

Trevor Mallard: Peter Davis is a good friend of mind. Last week he was attacked. I was incensed. I made some comments which were inappropriate. Members who have seen my briefing note will know that some of my information was not accurate. I made comments about Mary English which were incorrect. I know that her heart is in the right place. I apologise. I hope that we can de-escalate this business. And I hope we can return to a situation in which people like Dr English and others will be allowed to do their jobs.

Richard Prebble: I regard personal explanations as important. Here we have a senior minister making a number of political statements. I would like you to rule this as an abuse of the process.

Michael Cullen: The minister hasn’t yet finished his explanation. I would beseech the members opposite to listen carefully.

Bill English: We understand the point of this process. But if the Minister will insist on using it to make a political point about my wife being in the same position as Peter Davis, a point the PM has also been making to the media, then it will not acceptable.

Speaker: I think Mr Mallard has made a proper apology with regard to Mrs English.

Trevor Mallard: I also made comments about Ms Bradford which were inaccurate, and for that I apologise. (Later after an interjection from Mrs Shipley) I also mentioned the name of Mrs Shipley’s sister. For bringing her into this house I apologise.

Bill English: As long as the Minister is in the process of extending apologies. Will he also apologise about accusing me of withdrawing my children from private school because of a fall in family income?

Trevor Mallard: I did not make that allegation. I invite the member to look at the Hansard.

Jenny Shipley: Will he clarify whether he is confining his apology to his comments in the house, or does it extend to written material distributed outside the house.

Trevor Mallard: I sent a copy to Mr Soper of my notes. For that I apologise as well.

Bill English: The fax from his office was sent at 2.18. His question was answered at 2.46pm. This material was distributed before the question was asked.

Trevor Mallard: All that shows is that there is a timing problem on a fax machine. I was asked by Barry Soper when I left the house to give him the material. I did so later.

© Scoop Media

Top Scoops Headlines


Commercial Scoop User? Help Scoop Survive (and Thrive!)

The ScoopPro licensing terms require that commercial users of pay a reasonable fee in order to access the Scoop site so that this same information remains free and accessible to the wider public regardless of their disposable income. More>>


Joseph Cederwall: Building a Community Newsroom

A combination of new technology, ideas, institutions and business models and a renewed energy and commitment by the Scoop team, means Scoop aims to be at the forefront of the development of this renaissance that we term ‘News 3.0’. More>>


Scoop 3.0: Saving The News

Scoop Co-Founder Alastair Thompson - One of the saddest aspects of the decline of the news industry, not just here in NZ - but everywhere, is that it often seems invisible, in large part because news is a confidence business... More>>


UK Cabinet Backs Deal: Gordon Campbell On The Latest Roll Of The Brexit Dice

Brexit has left the British public looking like a nation of Wellington bus commuters. In both cases, the unholy mess bears no resemblance to what people were promised or the spin being used to justify it. More>>

Gordon Campbell: On The Democratic Leadership And Trump

On the big picture, the poll predictions were dead right. In the end, the Democratic Party won a clear victory in the House, and lost as expected in the Senate, where it had been defending at least 10 seats in regions that had voted heavily for Trump in 2016. More>>