Top Scoops

Book Reviews | Gordon Campbell | Scoop News | Wellington Scoop | Community Scoop | Search


Scoop Feedback: Kiwi Bashing Shows Frustration

In This Edition: Kiwi Bashing Shows Frustration - Quick (one-question) Political Scholastic Aptitude Test - Its Official: We're Mates With US Again


Kiwi Bashing Shows Frustration

Keith Rankin ( Keith Rankin: The Australian view of New Zealand - Scoop, 18 Oct 2001) concludes “Australia is a neighbour; that’s all”. He explains kiwi bashing over Ansett’s collapse reflects Australian insecurities, not a kiwi cultural trait of business incompetence. He is wrong.

Australians are direct. The Black Stump is a black stump, Shark Bay has sharks. When Aussies claim Kiwis are incompetent businessmen they mean exactly that.

Given synchronous collapses at Pasminco, HIH and OneTel, why bash Kiwis over Ansett? The answer is differing expectations of partnership.

Holmes (10 Oct 2001) quoted dialogue between Gary Toomey (ex-CEO, Air New Zealand) and the Australian Government:

[GT] If you don’t help us, Ansett will collapse.

[AG] We don’t give a s*** about Ansett.

Why would the Australian Government accept 16,000 job losses before an election? Virgin Blue and Ansett 2 refute insecurity about a low-cost competitor. Could it be fear? After all, “the New Zealand way is to out-compete the opposition, ruthlessly if necessary” (Rankin). Fair go!

Australians see Kiwi businessmen as having the capitalist dream: light-handed regulation, benign consumers, weak unions and cheap labour. Aussies operate with the exact opposite.

If business is a horse race, Aussie jockeys lose weight in New Zealand and Kiwi jockeys gain weight in Australia. Buying Ansett entered Air New Zealand into the Melbourne Cup. Crying ‘protectionism’ after the race questions the stewards’ rules — incompetence by Australian standards.

Australia is more than a neighbour. Australia is New Zealand’s biggest customer, largest foreign investor and military shield. Bashing kiwis expressed frustration for perceived abuse of this friendship. Saving Ansett would throw good money after bad.

Dayalan R. Pillay is an Australian strategy consultant.


Quick (one-question) Political Scholastic Aptitude Test

Here's a list of the countries that the U.S. has bombed since the end of World War II through 1999, compiled by historian William Blum.

China 1945-46
Korea 1950-53
China 1950-53
Guatemala 1954
Indonesia 1958
Cuba 1959-60
Guatemala 1960
Congo 1964
Peru 1965
Laos 1964-73
Vietnam 1961-73
Cambodia 1969-70
Guatemala 1967-69
Grenada 1983
Libya 1986
El Salvador 1980s
Nicaragua 1980s
Panama 1989
Iraq 1991-99
Sudan 1998
Aghanistan 1998
Yugoslavia 1999

In how many of these instances did a democratic government, respectful of Human rights, occur as a direct result? (chose one)

(a) 0
(b) zero
(c) none
(d) not a one
(e) a whole number between -1 and +1



Its Official: We're Mates With US Again

Dear Editor,

Following her return to New Zealand, the Prime Minister has loudly trumpeted the fact "We're mates with the US again" (23 Oct).

Citing the Secretary of State Colin Powell's reiteration of "their (the US) gratitude for the offer of New Zealand's SAS troops" and President Bush's comment that "out of evil comes good", (which, by the way, was not directed solely at the Prime Minister and New Zealand, but at the leaders' retreat in general), hardly amounts to much.

When I see the US referring to New Zealand as one of their "formal Allies", as is the case with Australia, and not just "a good friend", then I will know we are indeed "mates" with the US again.

While we are on the subject, the Prime Minister has also said on several occasions there will be no confirmation of what, where, when, how or if at all our SAS forces will be deployed.

Yet in the same release mentioned above she now informs the New Zealand public that the offer was one "the public should assume is being taken up." What sort of double-speak is this.

On the one hand the New Zealand government would not accept the US stance of "neither confirm or deny", the possibility their vessels were nuclear capable yet, on the other, we have our Government now telling the New Zealand public the very same thing in respect of the deployment of our SAS.

Who will ever know and who is there to check? Not good enough and I remain unconvinced.

Mirek Marcanik


© Scoop Media

Top Scoops Headlines


Gordon Campbell: On The Anti-Corbyn Split In British Labour

The resignation of seven UK Labour MPs in protest against the leadership of Jeremy Corbyn is another example of the centre-left’s readiness to sabotage its own cause... More>>

Scoop 3.0 Update & Membership Sale: The End Of ‘Objectivity’ In Journalism

2019 looks like it might well be another really bad, terrible, not so good year for the traditional journalism model globally... on the positive side, smaller independent players with innovative digital models and a more open approach like our ScoopPro service look likely to be more relevant than ever. More>>


Gordon Campbell: On America’s ‘Green New Deal’

‘Socialism’ is more of a political scare word than an objective condition. Even in the US, as Nate Silver’s 538 website pointed out this week there is polling evidence that modern Americans are inclined to treat socialism as meaning ‘equality’ rather than the ‘government ownership or control’ that Americans understood the term to mean back in the 1940s... More>>

Gordon Campbell: On Listening To Ocasio-Cortez About Tax

In its attitudes to tax, New Zealand has been the last colonial outpost of Thatcherism. Change, however, may be in the air. More>>


Gordon Campbell: On The Nelson Fire And Climate Change

The Nelson fire has been a useful warning of things to come, given how climate change will (a) increase the likelihood of reduced rainfall and drought-like conditions in many parts of New Zealand, which – obviously – will raise (b) the fire danger and (c) the cost of providing the communities at risk with the enhanced firefighting capabilities that they’re going to need. More>>


  • PublicAddress
  • Pundit
  • Kiwiblog