Book Reviews | Gordon Campbell | News Flashes | Scoop Features | Scoop Video | Strange & Bizarre | Search


Feedback: Critical On Israel/Palestinian Coverage

Feedback on Israel/Palestinian Reporting

First published on…

Send your views to Selwyn Manning.

Re: Journalists View Slaughter as Sharon Declares Withdrawal Plans. Spectator edition: and Scoop edition.

On 16 Apr 2002 at 8:50, Marc Blumenfrucht wrote: Regarding your article 'Journalists View Slaughter As Sharon Declares Withdrawal Plans - March 16 2002' I would like to ask how you can print unsubstantiated evidence, what happened to innocent until proven guilty. You obviously have no handle on the facts, and no interest in understanding those facts behind the Middle East conflict.

"The journalists are getting inside Jenin now - but only after Israeli soldiers buried the dead in mass graves - others, scores of dead people, were trucked off to no man's land for burial. War crimes occurred there. We are certain of that. The Geneva Convention was torn to shreds."

How are you certain of war crimes being committed when no one has brought any proof of that other than Palestinian Authority spokesmen. Not one mass grave has been found, and who exactly was carted off to no man’s land? I am on the ground here in Israel, and the supreme court was asking whether these bodies should be taken to be buried singly, in a special cemetery in Israel for fallen enemy soldiers, or returned to the Palestinians after being taken for counting to disprove their exaggerated death tolls. Never was there any intention of mass graves.

But how could the Palestinians lie about this, you may ask? Well, they have a long history of lies & brutality for example the lies in the first intifada:

In Gaza, rumours circulated that Palestinian youths wounded by Israeli soldiers were being taken to an army hospital near Tel Aviv and "finished off." Another rumour, claimed Israeli troops poisoned a water reservoir in Khan Yunis. A UN official said these stories were untrue. Only the most seriously injured Palestinians were taken out of the Gaza Strip for treatment, and, in some cases, this probably saved their lives. The water was also tested and found to be uncontaminated.

Also these Palestinians are some of the most brutal people in the world, against their own civilians too as exemplified in the first intifada:

Initially, more Palestinians died in clashes with Israeli troops — battles usually triggered by Arab attacks against soldiers — than were killed by their fellow Palestinians in the intrafada. This changed dramatically in early 1990. In that year, the number of Palestinians dying in engagements with Israelis fell by more than half. More Palestinians were murdered by Palestinians in the intrafada during that period. The internecine killings increased in 1991, with 238 Palestinians (up from 156) dying in the intrafada, more than triple the number who died at the hands of Israelis.

Nearly 200 Palestinians were killed by their fellow Palestinians in 1992, more than double the number killed in clashes with Israeli security forces. The methods of murder, Steven Emerson reported, included beheading, mutilation, cutting off ears and limbs and pouring acid on a victim's face.

The reign of terror became so serious that some Palestinians expressed public concern about the disorder. The PLO began to call for an end to the violence, but murders by its members and rivals continued.

When many Palestinians heard a knock at the door late at night, the New York Times reported, they were relieved to find an Israeli soldier rather than a masked Palestinian standing outside. Even after the intifada fizzled out following the signing of the Declaration of Principles in 1993, internecine warfare among the Palestinians continued, and persists to this day.

I suggest before reporting on issues, you get your facts right, and try to uphold at least a semblance of journalistic standards and integrity. The fact is that Israel could have carpet bombed Jenin and saved itself many soldiers lives, however out of humanitarian considerations, they decided not to use the American method, and instead go door to door putting their soldiers lives at unnecessary risk.

And you also say "The consequence: Children are clawing through the destruction, looking for pieces of yesterday, searching for things that were once familiar but were blown away from them - trinkets, toys, bowls that served food, a favourite piece of clothing, loved ones, brothers, sisters, mothers, fathers… anyone. They have seen horrors. Enough said. One can almost hear voices from this "holy land"… voices that Israel ought to heed. Here are today's children, left clinging to blood and dirt. Tomorrow… will be their's to seek justice. "

These children are those to whom Arafat and his authority have been teaching hate for many years, i suggest that you take a look at the following windows media video's, which will show you what these children have been being taught by their own 'peace loving' Palestinian authority:

This clearly shows the Palestinians making no effort in teaching their children the language of peace, and much of this video was shot in 1998, long before the intifada, and when the peace process was seen by both sides as being on track.

Please let me know your justifications for printing such outright, unsubstantiated lies, and what you think of these children after seeing these videos. Of course, you will probably blame it on 'The Occupation' but i suggest you get your facts right on that first, and if you would like me to enlighten you to the real truth of the occupation then just let me know, and I would be glad.

Yours Sincerely

M Blumenfrucht – Israel.

© Scoop Media

Top Scoops Headlines


Werewolf: Living With Rio’s Olympic Ruins

Mariana Cavalcanti Critics of the Olympic project can point a discernible pattern in the delivery of Olympics-related urban interventions: the belated but rushed inaugurations of faulty and/or unfinished infrastructures... More>>

Live Blog On Now: Open Source//Open Society Conference

The second annual Open Source Open Society Conference is a 2 day event taking place on 22-23 August 2016 at Michael Fowler Centre in Wellington… Scoop is hosting a live blog summarising the key points of this exciting conference. More>>



Gordon Campbell: On The Politicising Of The War On Drugs In Sport

It hasn’t been much fun at all to see how “war on drugs in sport” has become a proxy version of the Cold War, fixated on Russia. This weekend’s banning of the Russian long jumper Darya Klishina took that fixation to fresh extremes. More>>


Binoy Kampmark: Kevin Rudd’s Failed UN Secretary General Bid

Few sights are sadder in international diplomacy than seeing an aging figure desperate for honours. In a desperate effort to net them, he scurries around, cultivating, prodding, wishing to be noted. Finally, such an honour is netted, in all likelihood just to shut that overly keen individual up. More>>

Open Source / Open Society: The Scoop Foundation - An Open Model For NZ Media

Access to accurate, relevant and timely information is a crucial aspect of an open and transparent society. However, in our digital society information is in a state of flux with every aspect of its creation, delivery and consumption undergoing profound redefinition... More>>

Keeping Out The Vote: Gordon Campbell On The US Elections

I’ll focus here on just two ways that dis-enfranchisement is currently occurring in the US: (a) by the rigging of the boundary lines for voter districts and (b) by demanding elaborate photo IDs before people are allowed to cast their vote. More>>

Ramzy Baroud: Being Black Palestinian - Solidarity As A Welcome Pathology

It should come as no surprise that the loudest international solidarity that accompanied the continued spate of the killing of Black Americans comes from Palestine; that books have already been written and published by Palestinians about the plight of their Black brethren. In fact, that solidarity is mutual. More>>


Get More From Scoop

Top Scoops
Search Scoop  
Powered by Vodafone
NZ independent news