Book Reviews | Gordon Campbell | News Flashes | Scoop Features | Scoop Video | Strange & Bizarre | Search


Opinion: The Unspoken Issue

The Unspoken Issue

By Susan St John of the Child Poverty Action Group*

Something a little odd is happening in election year in New Zealand. There is an issue that is not supposed to be talked about. The astonishing thing is that the banned subject is not something radical and outrageous. It is about the way children are treated in the income distribution in New Zealand.

The NZ Child Poverty Action Group has repeatedly argued for this issue to be taken seriously, as does its counterpart in the UK. However in the UK, the message is heard and acted on in successive budgets as a matter of course. In New Zealand a conspiracy of silence reigns.

In a recent speech to the Seafarers Union, Laila Harre pointed out that Family Support has been neglected and that 30% of New Zealand children live in poverty. Her observation that the basic shape of the income support system was much as Roger Douglas and Ruth Richardson had left it, was labelled by Steve Maharey’s Office as 'gratuitously offensive' and her speech removed from the government’s web site.

The truth she spoke of is indeed quite offensive in that it is a blight on our sensibilities. If anything, Laila Harre understated the position for many low families compared to the late 1980s. At least in Roger Douglas’ days the principle of treating all children the same for supplementary income from the state was established. In 1986, he replaced a range of complicated rebates for low income families with Family Support; a single tax credit to assist all low income families regardless their source of low income. It is true that a little later in 1988 he tried to sabotage this beneficial contribution, but his infamous flat tax and guaranteed minimum family income package was quickly abandoned by the Lange government

In 1991 Ruth Richardson’s contribution was profoundly negative for children as she abolished the universal family benefit. Family Support became the sole form of weekly income supplement for children. But at least low income families had their family support increased by the value of the foregone family benefit and all low income families were still treated the same.

Worse was to come. In the mid 1990s, instead of properly adjusting Family Support to compensate for inflation, the Child Tax Credit was introduced. The Child Tax Credit is added to Family Support, but only for those children whose parents are deemed ‘independent from the state’. The rest, about 300,000 of the most needy children in New Zealand, miss out on this $15 per child per week payment.

It may be because they have a parent on a benefit, or on ACC for more than 3 months, or on New Zealand superannuation, or student allowance. A sole parent with a part-time job and child caring responsibilities works harder than just about anyone, but if they are on a part-DPB, their children too are ineligible for the Child Tax Credit.

Families with young children who do not get the Child Tax Credit have had a serious loss in purchasing power because their Family Support has only been increased minimally from when Roger Douglas put it in place in 1986. For a young one-child family it has risen by only $5 in 26 years, moreover to get the full amount of $47 a week, joint income must be under $20,000.

A one-child family on a low income of around $26,000 gets only $24 a week. This buys 60% less than the family support paid to a similar family 26 years ago. Even if the Child Tax Credit is included, the loss is still 35%. It is not just that regular CPI adjustments have failed to occur, and that catch-ups have been totally inadequate and spasmodic, but that the levels of income from which the claw-back occurs have been largely fixed for more than 10 years.

So what are we to make of the amnesia of the Labour government? When in opposition in 1996 they said that if elected they would immediately add the Child Tax Credit onto Family Support for all children. There appears to be no provisions for any inflation catch-up for either Family Support or the Child Tax Credit in the fiscal projections out to 2006. In the meantime the prices of housing, milk, fruit and vegetables continue to rise relentlessly and the city foodbanks see no let-up in the demands of low income families with young children.

The government protects even the wealthiest of those aged over 65 with generous universal indexed pensions, so why not low income families with children? Our standard of living as the population ages will depend critically on the investment society makes in these children today. It is time we heard why the government is reluctant to discuss these issues.

* - Child Poverty Action Group is a non-aligned independent body seeking better policies for children. Susan St John is a senior lecturer in the University of Auckland Business School

© Scoop Media

Top Scoops Headlines


Werewolf: Living With Rio’s Olympic Ruins

Mariana Cavalcanti Critics of the Olympic project can point a discernible pattern in the delivery of Olympics-related urban interventions: the belated but rushed inaugurations of faulty and/or unfinished infrastructures... More>>

Live Blog On Now: Open Source//Open Society Conference

The second annual Open Source Open Society Conference is a 2 day event taking place on 22-23 August 2016 at Michael Fowler Centre in Wellington… Scoop is hosting a live blog summarising the key points of this exciting conference. More>>



Gordon Campbell: On The Politicising Of The War On Drugs In Sport

It hasn’t been much fun at all to see how “war on drugs in sport” has become a proxy version of the Cold War, fixated on Russia. This weekend’s banning of the Russian long jumper Darya Klishina took that fixation to fresh extremes. More>>


Binoy Kampmark: Kevin Rudd’s Failed UN Secretary General Bid

Few sights are sadder in international diplomacy than seeing an aging figure desperate for honours. In a desperate effort to net them, he scurries around, cultivating, prodding, wishing to be noted. Finally, such an honour is netted, in all likelihood just to shut that overly keen individual up. More>>

Open Source / Open Society: The Scoop Foundation - An Open Model For NZ Media

Access to accurate, relevant and timely information is a crucial aspect of an open and transparent society. However, in our digital society information is in a state of flux with every aspect of its creation, delivery and consumption undergoing profound redefinition... More>>

Keeping Out The Vote: Gordon Campbell On The US Elections

I’ll focus here on just two ways that dis-enfranchisement is currently occurring in the US: (a) by the rigging of the boundary lines for voter districts and (b) by demanding elaborate photo IDs before people are allowed to cast their vote. More>>

Ramzy Baroud: Being Black Palestinian - Solidarity As A Welcome Pathology

It should come as no surprise that the loudest international solidarity that accompanied the continued spate of the killing of Black Americans comes from Palestine; that books have already been written and published by Palestinians about the plight of their Black brethren. In fact, that solidarity is mutual. More>>


Get More From Scoop

Top Scoops
Search Scoop  
Powered by Vodafone
NZ independent news