Book Reviews | Gordon Campbell | News Flashes | Scoop Features | Scoop Video | Strange & Bizarre | Search


Howard's End: Representatives That Represent

Will she, won't she? The heck with all this irritating election grandstanding stuff! I've got a proposal to end elections altogether and I think the idea deserves examination. Maree Howard writes.

Think about it! - No more elections and their costs, no more campaign finance or donations rows, no more pandering to special interest groups, no more brute force from party political machines, no more smarmy politicians seeking our vote.

Oh, the joy of it!

It was Thomas Jefferson who said that a healthy government needs a good revolution every now and then to keep it fresh and vital.

With everything that's been going on in Wellington of late, perhaps it's time to truly return the power to the people.

How? - Do away with the elected representatives and institute a ballot.

One day there is a knock on your door.

There stands two officials and one of them hands you a letter. "Congratulations!" the letter says. "You have been chosen by the Selective Service Administration ballot to serve your region as its Representative to the House of Representatives for a period not exceeding two years."

You've got four weeks to pack your bags, say your goodbyes to the family and then bundle yourself off to do your duty on behalf of your country.

The ballot would be run every year, replacing a third of the House each time so that there would always be a group of representatives present who were familiar and experienced with the way things worked. The public service support in the House would be for all representatives because there would be no political parties.

We could limit eligibility as a representative to those aged, say, 18 who have not been convicted of a serious crime in the past 10 years. Extreme mental incapacity might also be another restriction - although those with whom I've discussed this don't see that as any real impediment - there will be ways to work with those people, they say, and they are part of, and make their own contributions to, our society. Fair enough!

We could make it difficult to weasel out of serving. But no one would be allowed to serve two consecutive terms although you might be balloted twice - (unlikely given the numbers in the ballot) - but never twice in a row.

A final restriction is almost always suggested by anyone with whom I've discussed this: no lawyers or academics in the House.

We would need to examine compensation issues, job retention while serving as a representative, and the fulfilment of contracts and other obligations that might have been entered into before the representative was balloted. While this might seem daunting we are only dealing with, say, 30 people each year.

Why do I like this idea? The House of Representatives is supposed to be exactly that - representatives.

It was supposed to be the voice of ordinary people in our government. It was originally intended that representatives would be ordinary folk who served a term or two and then returned to their every-day lives.

As anyone can plainly see, this is no longer the case - and has not been for some years. A balloted House of Representatives rectifies this situation in a simple fashion.

Spare me the smarmy, insincere politician who only wants us once every three years while seeking our vote. I want my representative vital, alert and representing all of us - not tied to some backroom party political machine serving special interests or pandering to a particular sector-vote as is so often the case today.

Under this new system, the House of Representatives would then be about as non-partisan as one could imagine since the selection ballot would be free of any consideration of party affiliation.

The people (that's us) would be spared the election-year displays of lying, grand-standing and angst - and we would be saving millions of dollars at the same time.

Hell, with the money we save we might even be able to afford some genuine health and education services and even give our young people a free university education once again. We might even be able to afford to get some of our people out from living under bridges and in the streets and give them decent shelter.

With a House of Representatives in the hands of the people, unbeholden to any outside forces or special interests, there would be no incentive for our representatives but to act in the interests of the country and solve the critical issues once and for all. Now wouldn't that be something?

Remember, it is from a political-party government that all spending and budget bills originate. Who better to assess the costs and predict the benefits of programs than those who struggle day after day to make ends meet and who often find themselves at the mercy of laws passed by a legislature that felt it just had to "do something."

It frightens the hell out of me to think that our House of Representatives feels it has to make new laws to placate its money-laden masters. Our representatives should feel liberated to vote their conscience based on their understanding of the law and what the country and its people truly needs - and it ain't pork-barrel programs for special interest groups. I bet we would see fewer laws being passed under this new system.

A House peopled with representatives from every sector of society and working for all of society - absolutely devoid of the corrupting influences of special interest money and election-year grandstanding.

I could really enjoy living in that New Zealand!

© Scoop Media

Top Scoops Headlines


Werewolf: Living With Rio’s Olympic Ruins

Mariana Cavalcanti Critics of the Olympic project can point a discernible pattern in the delivery of Olympics-related urban interventions: the belated but rushed inaugurations of faulty and/or unfinished infrastructures... More>>

Live Blog On Now: Open Source//Open Society Conference

The second annual Open Source Open Society Conference is a 2 day event taking place on 22-23 August 2016 at Michael Fowler Centre in Wellington… Scoop is hosting a live blog summarising the key points of this exciting conference. More>>



Gordon Campbell: On The Politicising Of The War On Drugs In Sport

It hasn’t been much fun at all to see how “war on drugs in sport” has become a proxy version of the Cold War, fixated on Russia. This weekend’s banning of the Russian long jumper Darya Klishina took that fixation to fresh extremes. More>>


Binoy Kampmark: Kevin Rudd’s Failed UN Secretary General Bid

Few sights are sadder in international diplomacy than seeing an aging figure desperate for honours. In a desperate effort to net them, he scurries around, cultivating, prodding, wishing to be noted. Finally, such an honour is netted, in all likelihood just to shut that overly keen individual up. More>>

Open Source / Open Society: The Scoop Foundation - An Open Model For NZ Media

Access to accurate, relevant and timely information is a crucial aspect of an open and transparent society. However, in our digital society information is in a state of flux with every aspect of its creation, delivery and consumption undergoing profound redefinition... More>>

Keeping Out The Vote: Gordon Campbell On The US Elections

I’ll focus here on just two ways that dis-enfranchisement is currently occurring in the US: (a) by the rigging of the boundary lines for voter districts and (b) by demanding elaborate photo IDs before people are allowed to cast their vote. More>>

Ramzy Baroud: Being Black Palestinian - Solidarity As A Welcome Pathology

It should come as no surprise that the loudest international solidarity that accompanied the continued spate of the killing of Black Americans comes from Palestine; that books have already been written and published by Palestinians about the plight of their Black brethren. In fact, that solidarity is mutual. More>>


Get More From Scoop

Top Scoops
Search Scoop  
Powered by Vodafone
NZ independent news