Book Reviews | Gordon Campbell | News Flashes | Scoop Features | Scoop Video | Strange & Bizarre | Search


The Treaty of Waitangi: Government and Trusteeship

Webhosting Special Deal- Prohosting plan for NZ$25 ex-GST per month!!! Contact Spectator for more...

First published on…

The Treaty of Waitangi: Government and Trusteeship

By Nigel Kearney

More than 80 laws passed by Parliament refer to the 'principles of the Treaty of Waitangi'. No law, however, lists these principles, nor have our lawmakers issued any definitive statement as to what the principles are. In order for us to know what those 80 laws mean, we must make an effort to examine the Treaty and try to determine what principles it contains.

It's important to understand that despite the countless references to 'The Treaty of Waitangi', there are actually two treaties, one in English and one in Maori. There are significant differences between the two treaties and they were signed by different people. The full text of the Maori treaty, the English Version and the English translation of the Maori version are here:

There are two concepts that are essential to an accurate understanding of the meaning of the Treaty. The first is 'kawanatanga' in the Maori version, or 'sovereignty' in the English version. Sovereignty has somewhat complex historical and legal ramifications which are not part of the Maori concept of kawanatanga and probably could not have been anticipated by the Maori signatories to the Treaty.

Sir Hugh Kawharu is a leading Maori academic and was made a member of the Order of New Zealand in the recent Queen's Birthday Honours list. His use of the word 'government' probably best captures the spirit and intent of the concept of kawanatanga or sovereignty as mentioned in the Treaty.

The second important concept is 'rangatiratanga'. This is not directly translated in the English version but is represented by phrases such as 'protection of just Rights and Property' and 'possession of their Lands and Estates Forests Fisheries and other properties'.

Sir Hugh Kawharu translates rangatiratanga as 'chieftainship' and goes on to say that the Maori concept of chieftainship is most closely aligned with the modern concept of trusteeship. This is consistent with the English version of the treaty since trusteeship is primarily concerned with the protection and maintenance of property. Trusteeship certainly does not include the right to make or enforce laws, so any claim that rangatiratanga implies a right of government or sovereignty must be mistaken.

The first and second articles of the Treaty make it abundantly clear that kawanatanga or government is ceded by Maori to the Crown, while rangatiratanga or trusteeship of property is retained by Maori. It's important to remember that at the time the Treaty was signed, government interference in people's lives was only a fraction of what it is today. Sayings such as 'An Englishman's home is his castle' accurately capture the state of private property rights in 1840.

Since then, property rights have been steadily eroded. The passage of the Resource Management Act means that in some parts of New Zealand, a property 'owner' cannot even prune a tree without asking permission from the government.

When the authors of the Treaty granted Maori 'full exclusive and undisturbed possession of their Lands and Estates Forests Fisheries and other properties', they could never have imagined that British settlers and their descendants would not enjoy exactly the same rights. This is supported by Article three of the Treaty which grants Maori 'all the Rights and Privileges of British Subjects'.

The Maori version uses the word 'tikanga' which tends to imply responsibilities as well as rights. In addition, for reasons of fairness and equality, it's desirable that all New Zealanders have the same rights, privileges and responsibilities.

The only interpretation that is consistent with natural justice and the text and intent of the Treaty is that all New Zealanders should enjoy a very high degree of rangatiratanga or rights to the exclusive and undisturbed use and disposition of their land and property. At the same time, we should all be subject to kawanatanga or government by the Crown and be accorded the associated rights, privileges and responsibilities.

There is no need to regard rangatiratanga as a special right exclusively for Maori. Let's all demand that the government give us back our rangatiratanga.

Nigel Kearney

Send your comments to: Spectator News Editor.
© Spectator News Agency, Multimedia Investments Limited, 2002.

© Scoop Media

Top Scoops Headlines


Werewolf: Living With Rio’s Olympic Ruins

Mariana Cavalcanti Critics of the Olympic project can point a discernible pattern in the delivery of Olympics-related urban interventions: the belated but rushed inaugurations of faulty and/or unfinished infrastructures... More>>

Live Blog On Now: Open Source//Open Society Conference

The second annual Open Source Open Society Conference is a 2 day event taking place on 22-23 August 2016 at Michael Fowler Centre in Wellington… Scoop is hosting a live blog summarising the key points of this exciting conference. More>>



Gordon Campbell: On The Politicising Of The War On Drugs In Sport

It hasn’t been much fun at all to see how “war on drugs in sport” has become a proxy version of the Cold War, fixated on Russia. This weekend’s banning of the Russian long jumper Darya Klishina took that fixation to fresh extremes. More>>


Binoy Kampmark: Kevin Rudd’s Failed UN Secretary General Bid

Few sights are sadder in international diplomacy than seeing an aging figure desperate for honours. In a desperate effort to net them, he scurries around, cultivating, prodding, wishing to be noted. Finally, such an honour is netted, in all likelihood just to shut that overly keen individual up. More>>

Open Source / Open Society: The Scoop Foundation - An Open Model For NZ Media

Access to accurate, relevant and timely information is a crucial aspect of an open and transparent society. However, in our digital society information is in a state of flux with every aspect of its creation, delivery and consumption undergoing profound redefinition... More>>

Keeping Out The Vote: Gordon Campbell On The US Elections

I’ll focus here on just two ways that dis-enfranchisement is currently occurring in the US: (a) by the rigging of the boundary lines for voter districts and (b) by demanding elaborate photo IDs before people are allowed to cast their vote. More>>

Ramzy Baroud: Being Black Palestinian - Solidarity As A Welcome Pathology

It should come as no surprise that the loudest international solidarity that accompanied the continued spate of the killing of Black Americans comes from Palestine; that books have already been written and published by Palestinians about the plight of their Black brethren. In fact, that solidarity is mutual. More>>


Get More From Scoop

Top Scoops
Search Scoop  
Powered by Vodafone
NZ independent news