Book Reviews | Gordon Campbell | News Flashes | Scoop Features | Scoop Video | Strange & Bizarre | Search


Sludge Report #142: Richard Butler Is A CIA Asset

In This Edition: Senate Hearing On Iraq “Blitzkrieg” Now On - Richard Butler Is A U.S. Spy, A CIA Asset

NOTE: Authors of this report will be anonymous and wide ranging, and occasionally finely balanced. Indeed you are invited to contribute: The format is as a reporters notebook. It will be published as and when material is available. C.D. Sludge can be contacted at The Sludge Report is available as a free email service..Click HERE - to subscribe...


Sludge Report #142

Senate Hearing On Iraq “Blitzkrieg” Now On


Live on web streaming TV, a Senate debate on whether the U.S. should attack Iraq using what a U.S. General just described as “Blitzkrieg” tactics.

But that is not the topic of this report. Earlier this evening (it is now late night in Washington D.C.) former UNSCOM chief Richard Butler gave evidence, evidence that the U.S. Senate needs to understand the background of.


Richard Butler Is A U.S. Spy, A CIA Asset

Former UNSCOM Head, Chief Iraqi United Nations Arms Inspector, and Australian Richard Butler is a CIA Asset.

Sludge thinks it is very important to remind people of this fact at this time.

Why? Because Richard Butler is the slimiest of all forms of spy. He is the hawk’s hawk. For decades he has posed as an international bureaucrat, a man of peace and a figure responsible for nuclear disarmament. He says he cares, convincingly.

But during this period he has been one of the principle players – under all U.S. administrations, Republican and Democrat - in creating a system of international relations which enables the ongoing threat of first strike nuclear warfare.

Even worse he has actively assisted the U.S. to pursue unilateral, i.e. illegal non-UN sanctioned military adventures, at the same time as he has encouraged this inherently dangerous world.

He is a deeply corrupt individual.

It was Richard Butler who, as UNSCOM head in 1998, provided the U.S. with its official justification for what Scoop Media called at the time the Second Gulf War.

It is now a matter of historical record that the CIA and Mossad completely compromised UNSCOM during the period.

But for some reason few people have been informed of this part of the Gulf War history, and even fewer seem to remember it.

In 1998-99 the story went like this.

1. Saddam Hussein says UNSCOM contains CIA and Mossad spies. Which it did.
2. UNSCOM’S Richard Butler says he is doing his job impartially.
3. Saddam Hussein kicks out UNSCOM. Nobody believes him that UNSCOM are spies.
4. UNSCOM Inspector Scott Ritter tells everybody that Richard Butler is a liar.
5. Richard Butler tells everybody that Saddam Hussein has weapons of mass destruction.
6. Saddam Hussein says he hasn’t.
7. Richard Butler says he wants to go back to inspect.
8. Saddam says no, not unless the inspectors are not CIA spies.
9. The USA sets a deadline for Iraq to let in inspectors.
10. The deadline passes and the US starts bombing Iraq to make him let Richard Butler back in.
11. (Several months later) It is revealed in an inquiry that Richard Butler’s UNSCOM was riddled with CIA and Mossad spies. I.E. Saddam was always right.

Richard Butler’s comments today are particularly important.
His objective in giving evidence to the Senate is to provide an excuse to attack Iraq.

And he wants to do this without the U.S. Senate realising what it has done.

This is a trick that Butler specialises in, and of a sort that he has engaged in in the past.

Butler was the mastermind behind the Indefinite Extension Of The Non Proliferation Treaty, the diplomatic miracle that led to a nuclear armed Indian sub-continent, and which gave the right to nuclear powers to keep their nuclear weapons for ever.

The Senate therefore needs to be very cautious about what value they give to the tenets of any policy Richard Butler suggests.

Richard Butler today told the senate that they should “give Iraq one last chance” to let inspectors in. And only then attack.

This is the identical strategy to that employed in 1998. Namely, insist on weapons inspections. Then when Iraq refuses, bomb it.

This is an "apparently reasonable" position especially when it is one expressed by a “disarmament” expert like Richard Butler.

But if the U.S. Senate and house consent to this argument, they will be co-opted on to the same side of the page as the Iraq hawks.

Then when Saddam decides not to let the inspectors back, it will not just be the weapons of mass destruction that are at stake, now it will be the credibility and honour of the U.S. Senate and it's willingness to live up to its word.

This was an identical process that led to the NATO military fiasco in Kosovo. NATO, Blair, Clinton, Europe, everybody gave Slobodan Milosevic deadline after deadline to stop killing Kosovars.

Though very reluctant to do so initially, these political leaders eventually authorised the US-led NATO bombing operation against Yugoslavia, at least in part because otherwise what would be the value of their word?

It should be written somewhere in the bedrock of diplomatic parlance that deadlines are the enemy of peace.

And the U.S. Senate should remember this, and not let any of the Richard Butler "last chance" language leak into any house resolutions.

Finally, we can also assume that because Richard Butler is an asset of the CIA, that his views are also the views that the CIA, and views that Israel's Mossad are in accord with.

Therefore do not be surprised if this same argument, “one last chance” rhetoric, starts turning up in all the usual places.

Anti©opyright Sludge 2002

© Scoop Media

Top Scoops Headlines


Werewolf: Living With Rio’s Olympic Ruins

Mariana Cavalcanti Critics of the Olympic project can point a discernible pattern in the delivery of Olympics-related urban interventions: the belated but rushed inaugurations of faulty and/or unfinished infrastructures... More>>

Live Blog On Now: Open Source//Open Society Conference

The second annual Open Source Open Society Conference is a 2 day event taking place on 22-23 August 2016 at Michael Fowler Centre in Wellington… Scoop is hosting a live blog summarising the key points of this exciting conference. More>>



Gordon Campbell: On The Politicising Of The War On Drugs In Sport

It hasn’t been much fun at all to see how “war on drugs in sport” has become a proxy version of the Cold War, fixated on Russia. This weekend’s banning of the Russian long jumper Darya Klishina took that fixation to fresh extremes. More>>


Binoy Kampmark: Kevin Rudd’s Failed UN Secretary General Bid

Few sights are sadder in international diplomacy than seeing an aging figure desperate for honours. In a desperate effort to net them, he scurries around, cultivating, prodding, wishing to be noted. Finally, such an honour is netted, in all likelihood just to shut that overly keen individual up. More>>

Open Source / Open Society: The Scoop Foundation - An Open Model For NZ Media

Access to accurate, relevant and timely information is a crucial aspect of an open and transparent society. However, in our digital society information is in a state of flux with every aspect of its creation, delivery and consumption undergoing profound redefinition... More>>

Keeping Out The Vote: Gordon Campbell On The US Elections

I’ll focus here on just two ways that dis-enfranchisement is currently occurring in the US: (a) by the rigging of the boundary lines for voter districts and (b) by demanding elaborate photo IDs before people are allowed to cast their vote. More>>

Ramzy Baroud: Being Black Palestinian - Solidarity As A Welcome Pathology

It should come as no surprise that the loudest international solidarity that accompanied the continued spate of the killing of Black Americans comes from Palestine; that books have already been written and published by Palestinians about the plight of their Black brethren. In fact, that solidarity is mutual. More>>


Get More From Scoop

Top Scoops
Search Scoop  
Powered by Vodafone
NZ independent news