Book Reviews | Gordon Campbell | News Flashes | Scoop Features | Scoop Video | Strange & Bizarre | Search

 


Of Mice and Men

Of Mice and Men

Point of View: with Barbara Sumner Burstyn

Sometimes a scientific breakthrough is so remarkable it stops you in your tracks. The announcement recently that Dr Ina Dobrinski, a researcher at The University of Pennsylvania has created mice with fleshy lumps on their backs is one of those. While the lumps look innocuous they’re actually transplanted goat and pig sperm factories, able to pump out as much pig and goat sperm a day as your average goat or pig. Dr Dobrinski, who is planning human-mouse grafts, is proud of her achievements and maintains the research will benefit infertile men, especially those about to undergo chemo or other invasive techniques. Instead of losing the change to procreate the doctor predicts they’ll soon be storing their sperm on the backs of their pet mice.

Relocated into a New Zealand context such genetic research is not unusual. We have over 40 research groups, some attached to universities, either state-owned or private companies doing all manner of experiments on animals, including cloning and genetic modifications. What is strange is Dr Dobrinski’ s openness about her research. In New Zealand such openness is almost unheard of.

Last week the state-owned AgResearch successfully appealed to the Office of the Ombudsmen to stop the release of information on people belonging to its animal ethics committee. In support of the information suppression, Auckland University animal ethics chairman Dr Don Love reassured the public that no scientist in this country wanted to cause suffering in animals. The approval process, he says, particularly where the animal would suffer severely, was extremely rigorous. "You really have to go through the mill to get the box ticked to go ahead with those ones. You always have to justify what you are doing. It's not as if it's open slather."

Really?

Peter Wills is not so sure. An associate professor at Auckland University's physics department, he said in a NZ Herald interview as saying a recent AgResearch application lacked important details, such as the effects of the research on the cows used. Boycotting the proceedings of the Environmental Risk Management Authority (Erma) the body that oversees applications, he said they had a record of "rubber-stamping" research applications and ignoring opposing views to applications. Combine Will’s concerns with the recent report that AgResearch effectively sidestepped scrutiny by a new ethics council for it’s controversial work involving inserting a range of goat and human genes into cows and you begin to wonder if AgResearch is the last organization we should trust to behave ethically. Especially to animals.

A well-operated ethics committee has two essential functions. The first is to work consistently to avoid unnecessary experiments and encourage the search for alternatives. The second is to be transparent and accountable, both to the expectations of the public and to the researchers. According to animal rights activists in New Zealand our research community is already one of the most secretive in the world. The Chief Ombudsman’s decision will only exacerbate that and result in accountability limited only to those with a vested interest in the outcome. It will mean all procedures and decisions will be controlled within the research community itself. And even if the committees do have highly developed accountability mechanisms they will now be incapable of hearing the public voice. While communities will be unable to promote awareness about animal research issues. Of course AgResearch had compelling reasons to seek and gain their suppression order. Citing an attack on a scientist last year that involved acid poured on a car and threatening phone calls they say they are simply protecting their scientists and the people who serve on their ethics committees. The one thing AgResearch has not realized is that people take extreme measures in extreme situations. The knowledge that acts of cruelty are being carried out on more than 300,000 animals each year in New Zealand in a closed environment may be enough to make any mildly angry activists a little agitated. Secrecy drives not only the crown owned AgResearch and all the private institutions underground but also the animal activists.

It’s not good enough for ethics committees to tell us they’re being ethical and abiding by the rules. They must be seen to be ethical as well and committee members should be willing to stand behind their decisions. As Green Party MP Sue Kedgley said last week, “Why is there this great veil of secrecy if there is nothing to hide?"

This suppression order is not about protecting scientists, only one of whom in New Zealand has ever reported an attack. It’s a selfish desire to behave unhindered, to position the science above all else, as if science were a morality unto itself. By agreeing to the suppression order The Ombudsman has effectively created an environment where the acts of cruelty can flourish and the public imagination can run wild. If they’re openly growing human life on the bodies of mice in America, how much more are they doing in secrecy here?

Want to have your say? Email Barb with your feedback…

© Scoop Media

 
 
 
 
 
Top Scoops Headlines

 

Werewolf: Living With Rio’s Olympic Ruins

Mariana Cavalcanti Critics of the Olympic project can point a discernible pattern in the delivery of Olympics-related urban interventions: the belated but rushed inaugurations of faulty and/or unfinished infrastructures... More>>

Live Blog On Now: Open Source//Open Society Conference

The second annual Open Source Open Society Conference is a 2 day event taking place on 22-23 August 2016 at Michael Fowler Centre in Wellington… Scoop is hosting a live blog summarising the key points of this exciting conference. More>>

ALSO:

Buildup:

Gordon Campbell: On The Politicising Of The War On Drugs In Sport

It hasn’t been much fun at all to see how “war on drugs in sport” has become a proxy version of the Cold War, fixated on Russia. This weekend’s banning of the Russian long jumper Darya Klishina took that fixation to fresh extremes. More>>

ALSO:

Binoy Kampmark: Kevin Rudd’s Failed UN Secretary General Bid

Few sights are sadder in international diplomacy than seeing an aging figure desperate for honours. In a desperate effort to net them, he scurries around, cultivating, prodding, wishing to be noted. Finally, such an honour is netted, in all likelihood just to shut that overly keen individual up. More>>

Open Source / Open Society: The Scoop Foundation - An Open Model For NZ Media

Access to accurate, relevant and timely information is a crucial aspect of an open and transparent society. However, in our digital society information is in a state of flux with every aspect of its creation, delivery and consumption undergoing profound redefinition... More>>

Keeping Out The Vote: Gordon Campbell On The US Elections

I’ll focus here on just two ways that dis-enfranchisement is currently occurring in the US: (a) by the rigging of the boundary lines for voter districts and (b) by demanding elaborate photo IDs before people are allowed to cast their vote. More>>

Ramzy Baroud: Being Black Palestinian - Solidarity As A Welcome Pathology

It should come as no surprise that the loudest international solidarity that accompanied the continued spate of the killing of Black Americans comes from Palestine; that books have already been written and published by Palestinians about the plight of their Black brethren. In fact, that solidarity is mutual. More>>

ALSO:


Get More From Scoop

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Top Scoops
Search Scoop  
 
 
Powered by Vodafone
NZ independent news