Book Reviews | Gordon Campbell | News Flashes | Scoop Features | Scoop Video | Strange & Bizarre | Search

 


Stateside With Rosalea - Here come da judges


Stateside With Rosalea - Here come da judges

On October 17, President George W. Bush gave an address via satellite to the United States Hispanic Chamber of Commerce, which was meeting in New Smyrna, Florida to honour Hispanic businesswomen. After congratulating the women on their achievements he got straight to the heart of the matter, which was to have the audience bring pressure to bear on their local senators - always a fun thing to do in election year:

"Right now the Senate Judiciary Committee is now considering a friend of mine, a guy named Mike -- Miguel Estrada. He's my nominee for the D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals. If confirmed, he'll be the first Hispanic ever to serve on this important court. No one can deny that he's well-qualified. No one can deny he's a great lawyer and that he's highly skilled. Yet, unfortunately, there are senators who play politics with Miguel Estrada's nomination. There are senators searching for any reason to defeat him. I call upon the Senate leadership to treat Miguel Estrada with dignity and respect, and to bring his nomination up for the full Senate to confirm him before they adjourn."

The judicial branch of government in the United States and in the individual states is such a mystery to me that when I saw a large sign in upstate New York a couple of weeks ago saying 'Lust Supreme Court' I thought it was an ad for a new TV programme. It wasn't until later in the day when Judge Marc Lust handed me a leaflet as I walked along a small-town street that I realised it was a campaign ad.

On the ballot this November for everyone in California are three Supreme Court judges, and within each district, or division in the district, numerous judges for the six district courts of appeal. According to SmartVoter it works like this: "Each division has one Presiding Justice and two or more associate justices, appointed by the Governor and confirmed by the Commission on Judicial Appointments. The appointments are confirmed by the public at the next general election; justices also come before voters at the end of their 12-year terms. Vote "Yes" to confirm each of the following justices; vote "No" to oppose confirmation."

The Chief Justice and six associate justices of the Supreme Court are appointed/confirmed/elected in the same way. A recent article in the 'San Francisco Chronicle' gives you some idea of how these races are seen: http://sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2002/10/19/BA208240.DTL If the appointments aren't controversial, then I guess voters' approval is pretty much a foregone conclusion. Nonetheless, judicial appointments are made and approved by party political entities, which is why you see statements like this one by Judge Kolkey from the Third District Court of Appeal, that among his priorities is one "To exercise judicial restraint and respect for our other branches of government and the parties."

California's judicial system is one of the largest in the world. It has over 400 court locations, 7 Supreme Court judges, 93 appellate court judges, and 1,480 trial court judges, as well as 363 commissioners and referees. Among the functions of the courts are two that reflect the republican style of government here in the US: the preservation of the distinction between the branches of government, as provided by California's constitution, and the protection of the rights of individuals from encroachment by state or local government.

And yes, local governments have their own judicial branches as well - in Alameda County, for example, there is an election for a Superior Court Judge, Office 5, in which you vote for one only of two candidates. The two women faced off at a Meet the Candidate forum on Friday night in Oakland, a meeting that was broadcast live on the city's local cable channel. You can read the candidate statements at http://www.smartvoter.org/2002/11/05/ca/alm/race/133/

There is one last item on the 2002 ballot that is to do with California's legal system. It is a legislative constitutional amendment, Proposition 48, which is asking to delete all references to municipal courts from the California Constitution. Prior to June 1998, the Constitution provided that each county would have one superior court and at least one municipal court, the latter dealing with most civil cases in which the amount involved was less than $25,000, and with criminal cases involving misdemeanours such as traffic violations. Small claims courts were part of the municipal court system.

As the result of the passage of Proposition 220 by California voters in 1998, superior court judges have since unified municipal courts with superior courts, supposedly saving taxpayers millions of dollars. However, there are those who say that "the elimination of municipal courts in favor of a single "superior court" in each county has created at least the appearance of unfairness and has made local courts more insular and less accountable." You can read the arguments for and against this proposition at http://www.smartvoter.org/2002/11/05/ca/state/prop/48/

As we get closer to the election we are beginning to see more coverage of the candidates, races, and issues. Yesterday afternoon, before the big baseball game between The Fog and The Smog (the SF Giants and LA's Anaheim Angels), the local Fox channel aired a number of congressional candidate statements, giving free air time to any candidate who wanted to use it, and I see it has another couple of half-hour slots scheduled this afternoon (Sunday).

The Free Airtime Project, which is a public service of The California Channel and the California cable industry, has streaming video of all the state office candidates at http://www.freeairtimeproject.org/ if you have Real Player and want to put a face and voice to any of the candidates I've been telling you about.

The President's speech to USHCC is at http://www.whitehouse.gov/news/releases/2002/10/20021017-3.html


© Scoop Media

 
 
 
 
 
Top Scoops Headlines

 

Werewolf: Living With Rio’s Olympic Ruins

Mariana Cavalcanti Critics of the Olympic project can point a discernible pattern in the delivery of Olympics-related urban interventions: the belated but rushed inaugurations of faulty and/or unfinished infrastructures... More>>

Live Blog On Now: Open Source//Open Society Conference

The second annual Open Source Open Society Conference is a 2 day event taking place on 22-23 August 2016 at Michael Fowler Centre in Wellington… Scoop is hosting a live blog summarising the key points of this exciting conference. More>>

ALSO:

Buildup:

Gordon Campbell: On The Politicising Of The War On Drugs In Sport

It hasn’t been much fun at all to see how “war on drugs in sport” has become a proxy version of the Cold War, fixated on Russia. This weekend’s banning of the Russian long jumper Darya Klishina took that fixation to fresh extremes. More>>

ALSO:

Binoy Kampmark: Kevin Rudd’s Failed UN Secretary General Bid

Few sights are sadder in international diplomacy than seeing an aging figure desperate for honours. In a desperate effort to net them, he scurries around, cultivating, prodding, wishing to be noted. Finally, such an honour is netted, in all likelihood just to shut that overly keen individual up. More>>

Open Source / Open Society: The Scoop Foundation - An Open Model For NZ Media

Access to accurate, relevant and timely information is a crucial aspect of an open and transparent society. However, in our digital society information is in a state of flux with every aspect of its creation, delivery and consumption undergoing profound redefinition... More>>

Keeping Out The Vote: Gordon Campbell On The US Elections

I’ll focus here on just two ways that dis-enfranchisement is currently occurring in the US: (a) by the rigging of the boundary lines for voter districts and (b) by demanding elaborate photo IDs before people are allowed to cast their vote. More>>

Ramzy Baroud: Being Black Palestinian - Solidarity As A Welcome Pathology

It should come as no surprise that the loudest international solidarity that accompanied the continued spate of the killing of Black Americans comes from Palestine; that books have already been written and published by Palestinians about the plight of their Black brethren. In fact, that solidarity is mutual. More>>

ALSO:


Get More From Scoop

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Top Scoops
Search Scoop  
 
 
Powered by Vodafone
NZ independent news