Book Reviews | Gordon Campbell | News Flashes | Scoop Features | Scoop Video | Strange & Bizarre | Search


ACC bullies claimants before Christmas

ACC bullies claimants before Christmas

By Dave Crampton

ACC Case Managers and staff at ACC subsidiary Catalyst are sending illegal rehabilitation plans to claimants asking for them to be signed and returned by Christmas. If they are not signed the implication is that entitlements could be cut. One claimant received a letter on the 13th December and was asked to return it by the 19th December.

Scoop had earlier warned that ACC may attempt to disentitle claimants before Christmas and some claimants think that their possible disentitlement could lead to Christmas bonuses for ACC staff.

Rehabilitation plans are a legislative requirement for all claimants who have been on ACC for more than 13 weeks. These plans are designed to assist claimants off the scheme and back to work – or if they had no job prior to the accident, fully rehabilitated. One claimant, who has been on ACC for 10 years, says he has never signed a rehabilitation plan and received his first one last week – and it came as a bit of a surprise.

Yet rehabilitation plans are supposed to be a collaboration between claimants and case managers in a joint effort to rehabilitate claimants off ACC. Claimants say the plans sent last week are shonky as there are relevant details missing from the documents. Claimants are worried they will be kicked off ACC if they don’t sign the plans and say it amounts to nothing less than bullying.

This writer has corresponded with at least three people over the weekend who have received letters from ACC with a return date of either 19 or 21 December. This writer has seen the letter and notes that ACC says that as a rehabilitation plan is a legislative requirement, it has to be returned by 21 December, implying that the date is also part of the legislative requirement – which of course it isn’t.

ACC believes it has the authority to suspend entitlements if claimants refuse to agree to or comply with a rehabilitation plan. Yet ACC claimants have the right to be involved in developing rehabilitation plans, they have a right to be involved in the plan process and preparation and they have a right to refer that plan to their doctor.

However, Schedule 1 clause 8 (2) & (3) confers discretionary power on ACC to implement the plan with or without the claimant's agreement or signature after a reasonable time period. This may negate ACC's power to suspend because it has the power to implement the plan regardless.

Even if some claimants sign the rehabilitation plans they have the right to go to review on these plans if they later do not agree with them. If they were found to have signed under duress and with no adequate time frame to refer the plans to a GP or lawyer, they would most likely win the review and waste ACC’s time. The case manager will have to draft up another rehabilitation plan and go through the process correctly.

So why the haste before Christmas? Six days is not a reasonable time period to sign and return a rehabilitation plan, discuss it with a doctor, a case manager and an advocate merely because case managers want to “sort it out” before they go on Christmas leave with good exit figures.

Maybe all claimants who have no rehabilitation plan should go to review on their file and those who are getting rushed rehabilitation plans should request a copy of their file and find out why, all of a sudden, their file needs a rehabilitation plan.

© Scoop Media

Top Scoops Headlines


Werewolf: Living With Rio’s Olympic Ruins

Mariana Cavalcanti Critics of the Olympic project can point a discernible pattern in the delivery of Olympics-related urban interventions: the belated but rushed inaugurations of faulty and/or unfinished infrastructures... More>>

Live Blog On Now: Open Source//Open Society Conference

The second annual Open Source Open Society Conference is a 2 day event taking place on 22-23 August 2016 at Michael Fowler Centre in Wellington… Scoop is hosting a live blog summarising the key points of this exciting conference. More>>



Gordon Campbell: On The Politicising Of The War On Drugs In Sport

It hasn’t been much fun at all to see how “war on drugs in sport” has become a proxy version of the Cold War, fixated on Russia. This weekend’s banning of the Russian long jumper Darya Klishina took that fixation to fresh extremes. More>>


Binoy Kampmark: Kevin Rudd’s Failed UN Secretary General Bid

Few sights are sadder in international diplomacy than seeing an aging figure desperate for honours. In a desperate effort to net them, he scurries around, cultivating, prodding, wishing to be noted. Finally, such an honour is netted, in all likelihood just to shut that overly keen individual up. More>>

Open Source / Open Society: The Scoop Foundation - An Open Model For NZ Media

Access to accurate, relevant and timely information is a crucial aspect of an open and transparent society. However, in our digital society information is in a state of flux with every aspect of its creation, delivery and consumption undergoing profound redefinition... More>>

Keeping Out The Vote: Gordon Campbell On The US Elections

I’ll focus here on just two ways that dis-enfranchisement is currently occurring in the US: (a) by the rigging of the boundary lines for voter districts and (b) by demanding elaborate photo IDs before people are allowed to cast their vote. More>>

Ramzy Baroud: Being Black Palestinian - Solidarity As A Welcome Pathology

It should come as no surprise that the loudest international solidarity that accompanied the continued spate of the killing of Black Americans comes from Palestine; that books have already been written and published by Palestinians about the plight of their Black brethren. In fact, that solidarity is mutual. More>>


Get More From Scoop

Top Scoops
Search Scoop  
Powered by Vodafone
NZ independent news