Book Reviews | Gordon Campbell | News Flashes | Scoop Features | Scoop Video | Strange & Bizarre | Search


Firas Al-Atraqchi: Diplomacy? What Diplomacy?

Diplomacy? What Diplomacy?

By Firas Al-Atraqchi

The catch phrases 'last ditch effort for diplomacy', 'going the extra mile for diplomacy', and 'nobody wants a war' have been regurgitated time and again by the media to lend a compassionate, psychologically balanced, and moral face to the impending war on Iraq.

All three of the above are misconceptions; a mechanism to beguile the world, and specifically the American public.

Chile's representatives in the United Nations today suggested giving Iraq three weeks to meet certain disarmament objectives. The initiative was compiled to bridge differences between U.N. Security Council members who were feeling pressured by U.S. efforts to secure the necessary nine votes for a U.N. resolution to pass. The Chilean initiative seems to combine Canadian, Mexican, and British efforts to overcome the diplomatic impasse.

The White House flatly rejected the initiative saying three weeks was far too much time.

Far too much time for what? For diplomacy?

The word diplomacy is not a difficult word to understand; simply put, it refers to "the art or practice of conducting international relations, as in negotiating alliances, treaties, and agreements." Apparently, the words war, invasion, and pre-emptive action are missing from this definition. In fact, diplomacy is indeed the act of avoiding war through alliances, treaties, and agreements.

That is what diplomacy means to the rest of the world and certainly to the Canadian government.

To the war cabal in the U.S. government, however, diplomacy means the securing of international legalization for an illegal war. Diplomacy is a smokescreen, a carte blanche (do not pardon my French!), an authorization to wage war. A laissez-faire for U.S. policies in Iraq.

Consequently, the war is broken up into two political spheres: one advocating diplomacy to avoid bloodshed, and one advocating diplomacy to wage war.

The fact that such a metaphysical conflict is even occuring flies in the face of every major historic development in the manner in which nations 'deal' with one another since the Treaty of Westphalia in 1648, which marked the end of the Thirty Years War and was the first initiative towards international law.

Now, every international institution, every international law that creates an obstacle in the face of war efforts is classified 'irrelevant'.

How cheap and shameful. We are on the verge of regressing in historical international development. McLuhan's notion of a global village has now bastardized itself into global suspicion, hatred, and open warfare.

So, why was the Chilean proposal called a "non-starter"? Simple: It sets back the timetable for an invasion of Iraq and risks the prospect of derailing infantry morale in elevated desert temperatures. The war must start before temperatures reach 125 Fahrenheit.

We are going to war, ladies and gentlemen. Nothing Iraq or the Security Council could have done (or can do) stood a chance of stopping this juggernaut.

On Friday, six members of the Security Council dared to tell the U.S. they would not be dictated to even if they faced economic and political reprisals. The State Department went into damage control, pleading with the president to make a hasty speech regarding the Israeli-Palestinian conflict and calling for an emergency summit in Azores, off the coast of Portugal.

The U.S., Great Britain, and Spain are to meet to discuss "last ditch diplomatic efforts".

In today's language, that means war.

Postscript: So the House changed french fries to Freedom Fries. I suggest they also take out the words justice, liberty, fraternity, egality, policy, police, cosmopolitan, resistance, stamina, art deco, au pair, avante garde, blond(e) (oh, this should be a tough one, eh!), brunette, critique, coup, debutante, deja vu, encore, en masse, finale, and 30 percent of the English language. These words, and others, are originally FRENCH.

© Scoop Media

Top Scoops Headlines


Werewolf: Living With Rio’s Olympic Ruins

Mariana Cavalcanti Critics of the Olympic project can point a discernible pattern in the delivery of Olympics-related urban interventions: the belated but rushed inaugurations of faulty and/or unfinished infrastructures... More>>

Live Blog On Now: Open Source//Open Society Conference

The second annual Open Source Open Society Conference is a 2 day event taking place on 22-23 August 2016 at Michael Fowler Centre in Wellington… Scoop is hosting a live blog summarising the key points of this exciting conference. More>>



Gordon Campbell: On The Politicising Of The War On Drugs In Sport

It hasn’t been much fun at all to see how “war on drugs in sport” has become a proxy version of the Cold War, fixated on Russia. This weekend’s banning of the Russian long jumper Darya Klishina took that fixation to fresh extremes. More>>


Binoy Kampmark: Kevin Rudd’s Failed UN Secretary General Bid

Few sights are sadder in international diplomacy than seeing an aging figure desperate for honours. In a desperate effort to net them, he scurries around, cultivating, prodding, wishing to be noted. Finally, such an honour is netted, in all likelihood just to shut that overly keen individual up. More>>

Open Source / Open Society: The Scoop Foundation - An Open Model For NZ Media

Access to accurate, relevant and timely information is a crucial aspect of an open and transparent society. However, in our digital society information is in a state of flux with every aspect of its creation, delivery and consumption undergoing profound redefinition... More>>

Keeping Out The Vote: Gordon Campbell On The US Elections

I’ll focus here on just two ways that dis-enfranchisement is currently occurring in the US: (a) by the rigging of the boundary lines for voter districts and (b) by demanding elaborate photo IDs before people are allowed to cast their vote. More>>

Ramzy Baroud: Being Black Palestinian - Solidarity As A Welcome Pathology

It should come as no surprise that the loudest international solidarity that accompanied the continued spate of the killing of Black Americans comes from Palestine; that books have already been written and published by Palestinians about the plight of their Black brethren. In fact, that solidarity is mutual. More>>


Get More From Scoop

Top Scoops
Search Scoop  
Powered by Vodafone
NZ independent news