Book Reviews | Gordon Campbell | News Flashes | Scoop Features | Scoop Video | Strange & Bizarre | Search


It’s How You Sell The War That Matters

David Miller Online: It’s How You Sell The War That Matters.

By David Miller

Despite what the anti-war lobby in New Zealand and around the world think or say, the United States and Britain have already made their decision to go to war with Iraq.

This decision was made in 1991 when the US and Britain failed to remove Saddam Hussein from power when they had the chance. Since then they have maintained the pressure on Saddam through economic sanctions and their continued air presence in what has amounted to a kind of ‘periphery strategy’.

However this strategy has failed and the US and Britain have become increasingly isolated in their quest to unseat Saddam. So why has this been the case? It is not that the rest of the world has become blind to Saddam’s human rights abuses, his flaunting of the UN resolutions or even the economic opportunities of doing business with Iraq.

The problem is that the United States and Britain have not sold this war very well at all.

The problem for the US and British governments is that they are running into increasing opposition within their own populations for any Mesopotamian adventure. Tony Blair is already faced with a revolt within his own Cabinet and party. If he is to emerge from this crisis with his political future intact then he needs to be able to justify the war with his own people and to be able to say that the UN was behind it. Even if the allies can scrape together enough votes to pass it through the Security Council and if France and Russia do not exercise their veto, then it will be because they gave in to American economic pressure and the diplomatic victory will ring hollow indeed.

Hence the need for spin and this was the reason why Messrs Bush and Blair met with the Spanish Prime Minister in the Azores over the weekend. It was one last opportunity to try and sell the war to the International community and their own people.

The publicity campaign produced nothing new. Once again the allies gave Baghdad a fresh ultimatum and once again they declared that this would be the last chance. They also made it clear that if the new resolution fails and war is undertaken unilaterally then the opponents of the war are to blame for damaging the reputation and credibility of the UN and allowing Saddam another opportunity to hide his weapons and defy the world organisation. The allies have also argued that resolution 1441 made provisions for war if Iraq was deemed un-cooperative and that if an invasion is not undertaken then the Iraqis can still threaten the stability of the Middle East with their weapons of mass destruction and sponsorship of terrorist organisations.

This line of persuasion is familiar in both its content and effect. The world has heard it for over a decade and instead of embracing it, people have become increasingly sceptical and hostile. The reason is that the claims of large, hidden Iraqi arsenals have not been proved conclusively enough for people around the world to support a war. While the reports delivered by Hans Blix have criticised the Iraqis for not fully complying with UN inspectors they have not produced any serious evidence of stock piled weapons and there is always that element of doubt lingering over the claims of the US and Britain that they actually exist. This element of doubt plays into the hands of those opposed to war and furthers their argument that the inspectors need to be given more time. The case for going to war has also been constantly undermined by the impact that the economic sanctions have had on the Iraqi population and the anti war lobbyists around the world have been strident in their case that Iraqi children are suffering under the ongoing pressure.

The most powerful factor that hinders the allied publicity machine is that one cannot escape the impression that there is a personal edge to this upcoming war. Despite his claims to the contrary, Mr. Bush cannot escape the allegations that he is merely finishing the job that his father started and that having missed the opportunity to remove Saddam in 1991, both governments are not about to let this chance go begging. After all, Saddam has outlasted two previous Presidents and Prime Ministers and this does give him the image that he is a survivor against the power that the US and Britain can bring to bear against him. In other words, he makes them look incapable and inept.

It is to late to sell the case for war and the removal of Saddam in 2003. That job should have been undertaken properly in 1991. Time was always going to be his best ally especially if he can sow any seeds of doubt into people’s minds over his military capabilities attitudes will harden towards conflict. A strong case is always desirable even in the eleventh but ultimately it is not needed. War is coming regardless of how much spin Washington and London put on their case and despite what people here in New Zealand think or write.

© Scoop Media

Top Scoops Headlines


Werewolf: Living With Rio’s Olympic Ruins

Mariana Cavalcanti Critics of the Olympic project can point a discernible pattern in the delivery of Olympics-related urban interventions: the belated but rushed inaugurations of faulty and/or unfinished infrastructures... More>>

Live Blog On Now: Open Source//Open Society Conference

The second annual Open Source Open Society Conference is a 2 day event taking place on 22-23 August 2016 at Michael Fowler Centre in Wellington… Scoop is hosting a live blog summarising the key points of this exciting conference. More>>



Gordon Campbell: On The Politicising Of The War On Drugs In Sport

It hasn’t been much fun at all to see how “war on drugs in sport” has become a proxy version of the Cold War, fixated on Russia. This weekend’s banning of the Russian long jumper Darya Klishina took that fixation to fresh extremes. More>>


Binoy Kampmark: Kevin Rudd’s Failed UN Secretary General Bid

Few sights are sadder in international diplomacy than seeing an aging figure desperate for honours. In a desperate effort to net them, he scurries around, cultivating, prodding, wishing to be noted. Finally, such an honour is netted, in all likelihood just to shut that overly keen individual up. More>>

Open Source / Open Society: The Scoop Foundation - An Open Model For NZ Media

Access to accurate, relevant and timely information is a crucial aspect of an open and transparent society. However, in our digital society information is in a state of flux with every aspect of its creation, delivery and consumption undergoing profound redefinition... More>>

Keeping Out The Vote: Gordon Campbell On The US Elections

I’ll focus here on just two ways that dis-enfranchisement is currently occurring in the US: (a) by the rigging of the boundary lines for voter districts and (b) by demanding elaborate photo IDs before people are allowed to cast their vote. More>>

Ramzy Baroud: Being Black Palestinian - Solidarity As A Welcome Pathology

It should come as no surprise that the loudest international solidarity that accompanied the continued spate of the killing of Black Americans comes from Palestine; that books have already been written and published by Palestinians about the plight of their Black brethren. In fact, that solidarity is mutual. More>>


Get More From Scoop

Top Scoops
Search Scoop  
Powered by Vodafone
NZ independent news