Book Reviews | Gordon Campbell | News Flashes | Scoop Features | Scoop Video | Strange & Bizarre | Search


The British Public Should Have Had A Say On War

The British Public Should Have Had A Say On War

From The Streets Of London with Malcolm Aitken

With such widespread opposition to the Blair Government’s policy, attacking Iraq should have been put to a referendum.

Tuesday night’s House of Commons votes paving the way for war didn’t accurately reflect public opinion. On such a vital issue it would be fairer and wiser to let the people decide.

So much is at stake. The lives and welfare of Iraqis are paramount. Iraq’s people have endured so much in recent years. Firstly, the cruelty and corruption of Saddam’s despicable regime. Domestically, no doubt, Saddam Hussein has been supported by a cadre of thugs, bigots, power mongers and opportunists, the type of people who benefit from such regimes.

He hasn’t faced much active opposition from hundreds of thousands of pragmatic compatriots who probably haven’t seen much of a choice but to ‘get on’ under Saddam-because there hasn’t been much choice. This writer certainly wants to see rid of such oppressors, but it’s important how it’s done, for what reasons and by whom.

Internationally, men such as Donald Rumsfeld have in the past participated in administrations happy to benefit politically and financially from having their little tinpot dictator in Baghdad.

Moreover sanctions on Iraq have contributed to a desperate health situation. And the alleged illegal and totally indefensible deployment of depleted uranium shells and bullets by the US in the Gulf War hasn’t received the media coverage nor gained the prominence on the world political stage and in the international legal arena that such heinous accusations warrant.

The lives of millions of Iraqis is at stake here, people who haven’t done anything wrong, many of them want to be ‘liberated’ from Saddam. The lives of Iraqi, US and British troops in the coming conflict (that’s the word being employed in the war propaganda) is also important-there could be a high body count on ‘our’ side. The exposure of the British and US public to reprisal terrorist attacks is another consideration, which, typically, doesn’t seem to have been taken seriously enough.

The effectiveness of the UN in working together to disarm tyrants peacefully has been undermined by the events of recent days, same with the right of nations to use their UN security council vote without hysterical feet stamping, huffing and puffing and downright stirring up of prejudice by others wanting their way using any means necessary.

British people should have had a say in a policy that could such serious ramifications for Europe, Nato, and Britain’s reputation at the UN.

Direct democracy shouldn’t be viewed through rose tinted glasses. It’s majoritarian by definition and therefore potentially seriously illiberal. The limitations are obvious for people interested in both collective and individual rights.

As much as referenda have their place, to put gay rights legislation or the death penalty, for example, to the popular vote against a backdrop of reactionary, narrow-minded public opinion, really risks the imposing a tyranny of the majority.

However, it is about time-2003-that the public was treated with more respect by a very self- important and to some extent self-appointed political (ruling) class.

This ‘conflict’ will affect everyone here. This is a momentous event and neither Tony Blair nor the government has a monopoly on wisdom. Actually, Tony Blair has been reckless in his disregard for international law, and although Clare Short, whose blatant hypocrisy has angered many people here, may find it hard to make up her mind, there are millions of people around the world who oppose this war, now, in these circumstances at least.

The complexity of some of the questions surrounding the Iraq crisis means a full and frank public debate would be desirable pre-referendum. This is completely viable however and conservatives who deflect suggestions of referenda with comments about the supposed huge financial outlay have less of a case by the day, as technological advances render direct democracy cheaper.

Anyway, some people need reminding that some things do come before money, for example people’s right to have a meaningful and responsible role in shaping their own futures. This is no simplistic argument…referenda couldn’t be used for every little issue of the day, but going into such a war is a matter of other people’s lives and deaths for one and shouldn’t be left to a handful of Ministers.

Yet again those who defend democracy and promote its forceful export do little to enhance it domestically.

This should have been put to a vote, so all voting Brits could really own a decision that will have such serious consequences for everyone in Britain, and potentially the world.


- Malcolm Aitken is a freelance journalist based in London. He can be contacted at

© Scoop Media

Top Scoops Headlines


Werewolf: Living With Rio’s Olympic Ruins

Mariana Cavalcanti Critics of the Olympic project can point a discernible pattern in the delivery of Olympics-related urban interventions: the belated but rushed inaugurations of faulty and/or unfinished infrastructures... More>>

Live Blog On Now: Open Source//Open Society Conference

The second annual Open Source Open Society Conference is a 2 day event taking place on 22-23 August 2016 at Michael Fowler Centre in Wellington… Scoop is hosting a live blog summarising the key points of this exciting conference. More>>



Gordon Campbell: On The Politicising Of The War On Drugs In Sport

It hasn’t been much fun at all to see how “war on drugs in sport” has become a proxy version of the Cold War, fixated on Russia. This weekend’s banning of the Russian long jumper Darya Klishina took that fixation to fresh extremes. More>>


Binoy Kampmark: Kevin Rudd’s Failed UN Secretary General Bid

Few sights are sadder in international diplomacy than seeing an aging figure desperate for honours. In a desperate effort to net them, he scurries around, cultivating, prodding, wishing to be noted. Finally, such an honour is netted, in all likelihood just to shut that overly keen individual up. More>>

Open Source / Open Society: The Scoop Foundation - An Open Model For NZ Media

Access to accurate, relevant and timely information is a crucial aspect of an open and transparent society. However, in our digital society information is in a state of flux with every aspect of its creation, delivery and consumption undergoing profound redefinition... More>>

Keeping Out The Vote: Gordon Campbell On The US Elections

I’ll focus here on just two ways that dis-enfranchisement is currently occurring in the US: (a) by the rigging of the boundary lines for voter districts and (b) by demanding elaborate photo IDs before people are allowed to cast their vote. More>>

Ramzy Baroud: Being Black Palestinian - Solidarity As A Welcome Pathology

It should come as no surprise that the loudest international solidarity that accompanied the continued spate of the killing of Black Americans comes from Palestine; that books have already been written and published by Palestinians about the plight of their Black brethren. In fact, that solidarity is mutual. More>>


Get More From Scoop

Top Scoops
Search Scoop  
Powered by Vodafone
NZ independent news