Book Reviews | Gordon Campbell | News Flashes | Scoop Features | Scoop Video | Strange & Bizarre | Search

 


Stateside with Rosalea: Monday, gloomy Monday


Stateside with Rosalea

Monday, gloomy Monday

By Rosalea Barker

On Sunday morning, I watched a talking heads political TV show for the first time since early January. It was ABC's 'This Week' and the host was interviewing former (Bush Snr) Secretary of State James Baker. Baker was talking about winning the peace after winning the war in Iraq.

I despair. Who the hell do they think are going to rush into Iraq as a peacekeeping force, when this invasion of Iraq by the US was as wrong as the invasion of Kuwait by the Iraqis? There have been troops from around the world monitoring peace in the Middle East since 1948. Has their presence ever stopped the political ambitions of either the Israelis or the Arabs? Is the presence of a peacekeeping force in Iraq ever likely to stop the political ambitions of either the US or the Arabs? Is Afghanistan an example of how such a thing would work? Does the world even remember Afghanistan exists?

For an interesting view of how the US Army implements and views its peacekeeping obligations, I recommend an article in 'The Atlantic Monthly' from October 2001. This issue was already printed when the twin towers and the Pentagon were bombed so you'll find no mention of that. If you go to http://www.theatlantic.com/issues/backissues.htm and scroll down to October 2001, you'll see the cover with a soldier on it and the article's title: Peace is Hell. You'll also see why the US has no hope of "winning" in Iraq short of bombing the entire populace out of existence.

I repeat the mantra from the 2000 Republican National Convention: Bring them home! Those thousands of delegates were calling that out in response to Dick Cheney's speech about how much it was costing to have US troops on peacekeeping duties, but the same applies to this insane incursion into a foreign nation where there is nothing to be gained - even in a so-called victory - but world instability.

Getting back to 'This Week', the conservative commentator George Will always closes the show, and this Sunday his comments were about television coverage of the war. He asked: "If there had been real-time television coverage at Gettysburg, might this be two countries today? Might Americans have recoiled from the carnage, and allowed the South to secede?" His, untypically weak, reply to that question was: "I think not."

"Americans are not squeamish about sacrifice when they believe the stakes are important," he continued. "Public support for the Vietnam War eroded not because of television, but because the public decided the government had no plan for winning."

George Will's opinion notwithstanding, the television image of a man being executed in the street and the photo of women and children killed in the My Lai massacre, are generally credited with turning public opinion against the Vietnam war, leading to its end. Technology has taken us way beyond the Vietnam War now, in terms of war reporting, but for those who don't think war is a spectator sport the sight of the real effects is as potent an anti-war message as it ever was.

Another thing that hasn't changed is that the stakes have to be seen as important enough, just like Will says. So you can expect a ratcheting up of this aspect of the war in the coming days. Because, frankly, if the government has no plan for "winning" other than the bombardment and destruction of one of the cradles of human civilization, no amount of trying to capitalise on the strength and visibility of the peace movement is going to help it.

Which is why I wage "anti-war", not "peace". I'd like to see the Bush administration and its apologists say it's going to win the anti-war in Iraq.

© Scoop Media

 
 
 
 
 
Top Scoops Headlines

 

Werewolf: Living With Rio’s Olympic Ruins

Mariana Cavalcanti Critics of the Olympic project can point a discernible pattern in the delivery of Olympics-related urban interventions: the belated but rushed inaugurations of faulty and/or unfinished infrastructures... More>>

Live Blog On Now: Open Source//Open Society Conference

The second annual Open Source Open Society Conference is a 2 day event taking place on 22-23 August 2016 at Michael Fowler Centre in Wellington… Scoop is hosting a live blog summarising the key points of this exciting conference. More>>

ALSO:

Buildup:

Gordon Campbell: On The Politicising Of The War On Drugs In Sport

It hasn’t been much fun at all to see how “war on drugs in sport” has become a proxy version of the Cold War, fixated on Russia. This weekend’s banning of the Russian long jumper Darya Klishina took that fixation to fresh extremes. More>>

ALSO:

Binoy Kampmark: Kevin Rudd’s Failed UN Secretary General Bid

Few sights are sadder in international diplomacy than seeing an aging figure desperate for honours. In a desperate effort to net them, he scurries around, cultivating, prodding, wishing to be noted. Finally, such an honour is netted, in all likelihood just to shut that overly keen individual up. More>>

Open Source / Open Society: The Scoop Foundation - An Open Model For NZ Media

Access to accurate, relevant and timely information is a crucial aspect of an open and transparent society. However, in our digital society information is in a state of flux with every aspect of its creation, delivery and consumption undergoing profound redefinition... More>>

Keeping Out The Vote: Gordon Campbell On The US Elections

I’ll focus here on just two ways that dis-enfranchisement is currently occurring in the US: (a) by the rigging of the boundary lines for voter districts and (b) by demanding elaborate photo IDs before people are allowed to cast their vote. More>>

Ramzy Baroud: Being Black Palestinian - Solidarity As A Welcome Pathology

It should come as no surprise that the loudest international solidarity that accompanied the continued spate of the killing of Black Americans comes from Palestine; that books have already been written and published by Palestinians about the plight of their Black brethren. In fact, that solidarity is mutual. More>>

ALSO:


Get More From Scoop

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Top Scoops
Search Scoop  
 
 
Powered by Vodafone
NZ independent news