Book Reviews | Gordon Campbell | News Flashes | Scoop Features | Scoop Video | Strange & Bizarre | Search


Stateside with Rosalea: Rotate the State

Stateside with Rosalea

Rotate the State

By Rosalea Barker

I thought I'd go back to just one column a week, as otherwise I'd be doing a war diary all the rest of my life. But, just in passing, today is the last day to submit taxes here in the US, so here is a link to the petition the National War Tax Resistance Coordinating Committee has on-line:

Last week I went to an interesting talk that looked at three countries with federal governments - Canada, India, and the US - and the number of political parties that were successful in elections in each country. The graphs for Canada and India were vibrant, while the one for the US elicited this comment: The patient is dead.

Back in the 1950s when welfare states were a predominant form of bureaucracy, someone formulated a law that states that in every single-member first-past-the-post (plurality) system only two parties will get most of the votes. However, since the 1970s, the election results of many countries - like Canada, and even the UK - do not conform to Duverger's Law.

The United States does, and one can't help wondering if its political system is deliberately tuned so that it always will. According to the political scientist who gave the talk, the differentiating factor (between having several effective parties, and having just two) is the degree to which federal policy-making is seen as having the most effect in the voter's day-to-day life.

The US has the ultimate in simplistic devices for making federal (rather than state or local) policy-making seem most important in voter's lives. It's called the presidency. Since the Framers of the US Constitution created the executive branch for specific reasons that are still applicable today, it's hardly likely that the presidency is ever going to be abolished.

But did the Framers intend the presidency to be so distorting an influence on state and national politics? Since they never wanted to have a party-based system in the first place, and it is the party system that enables the presidency to have such a distorting influence, I'd venture that the answer to that question is No.

They did want the president to be a nationally known figure, but these days anyone with a PR firm can become a nationally known figure. So why have a nationwide vote for the president? I say abolish the Electoral College and have the vote for a 4-year presidency rotate through the states, beginning with the first one - Delaware. The candidate would have to fulfill one extra requirement than they do now, which is to have been a resident of the electing state for 25 years.

Great! Now that I've got that little constitutional amendment off my mind, may I direct you to a rational person's view of the battles that exist between federal, state, and local body jurisdictions here in the US. Alan Ehrenhalt is a columnist for Governing magazine:

He wasn't the person who gave the talk about the influence of federal policies on party systems. Pradeep Chhibber was, and his publication list is at,P/

© Scoop Media

Top Scoops Headlines


Werewolf: Living With Rio’s Olympic Ruins

Mariana Cavalcanti Critics of the Olympic project can point a discernible pattern in the delivery of Olympics-related urban interventions: the belated but rushed inaugurations of faulty and/or unfinished infrastructures... More>>

Live Blog On Now: Open Source//Open Society Conference

The second annual Open Source Open Society Conference is a 2 day event taking place on 22-23 August 2016 at Michael Fowler Centre in Wellington… Scoop is hosting a live blog summarising the key points of this exciting conference. More>>



Gordon Campbell: On The Politicising Of The War On Drugs In Sport

It hasn’t been much fun at all to see how “war on drugs in sport” has become a proxy version of the Cold War, fixated on Russia. This weekend’s banning of the Russian long jumper Darya Klishina took that fixation to fresh extremes. More>>


Binoy Kampmark: Kevin Rudd’s Failed UN Secretary General Bid

Few sights are sadder in international diplomacy than seeing an aging figure desperate for honours. In a desperate effort to net them, he scurries around, cultivating, prodding, wishing to be noted. Finally, such an honour is netted, in all likelihood just to shut that overly keen individual up. More>>

Open Source / Open Society: The Scoop Foundation - An Open Model For NZ Media

Access to accurate, relevant and timely information is a crucial aspect of an open and transparent society. However, in our digital society information is in a state of flux with every aspect of its creation, delivery and consumption undergoing profound redefinition... More>>

Keeping Out The Vote: Gordon Campbell On The US Elections

I’ll focus here on just two ways that dis-enfranchisement is currently occurring in the US: (a) by the rigging of the boundary lines for voter districts and (b) by demanding elaborate photo IDs before people are allowed to cast their vote. More>>

Ramzy Baroud: Being Black Palestinian - Solidarity As A Welcome Pathology

It should come as no surprise that the loudest international solidarity that accompanied the continued spate of the killing of Black Americans comes from Palestine; that books have already been written and published by Palestinians about the plight of their Black brethren. In fact, that solidarity is mutual. More>>


Get More From Scoop

Top Scoops
Search Scoop  
Powered by Vodafone
NZ independent news