Book Reviews | Gordon Campbell | News Flashes | Scoop Features | Scoop Video | Strange & Bizarre | Search

 


Sludge #156 – SAIC Connected To E-Voting Whitewash

In This Edition: SAIC Connected To E-Voting Whitewash - $$$$$s To Clean Up E-Vote Stink - ITAA eVoting Industry Coalition DRAFT Plan, Activities, and Pricing - For More Information

Sludge Report #156

SAIC Connected To E-Voting Whitewash


See also...
- Sludge #157 – The ITAA, The Election Center & R. Doug Lewis
- & Watch for breaking news on this Scoop at blackboxvoting.com


http://www.blackboxvoting.com
Read The Book…Support The Cause
Pre-Order Your Copy Today

On the board of the Enterprise Solutions Division of the Information Technology Association of America (ITAA) – a lobbying organisation bidding to provide a $200,000+ public opinion manipulation campaign on electronic voting – is a senior vice president of SAIC, the company tasked with investigating the security of the Diebold voting machine technology in the states of Maryland and Ohio.

The revelation that Ronald J Knecht, Senior Vice President, SAIC, and a former defence intelligence chief, is connected to the proposed voting machine whitewash push seems certain to fuel public concerns about the number of conflicts on interest in the voting machine industry.

SAIC has been tasked by the Governor of the state of Maryland to report on security concerns around Diebold Election Systems software and hardware..

To date in the developing story about electronic security concerns about new touch screen voting systems – black box voting – high profile conflicts of interest have already caused problems for 1) Nebraska Republican Senator Chuck Hagel and 2) for Johns Hopkins university professor Avi Rubin, co-author a report damning Diebold's touch screen software security published in June.

*********

$$$$s To Clean Up E-Vote Stink

The document that follows is a confidential internal memo, and is published here as intended source material for the numerous US media presently pursuing the Diebold FTP Files story broken here on Scoop. (See… Google Breaking Headlines - Wired – Ohio – New York Times – MSNBC )

It provides a rare glimpse into the insides of a major corporate United States emergency PR operation being run at full throttle.

In particular it reveals the plan prepared by the Enterprise Solutions division's Michael Kerr for the ITAA – an organisation funded and representing many of the biggest defence contractors - to clean up the public impression left by recent revelations concerning the hackability of Diebold Elections Systems software. Diebold's software source code was left by the company on an open to the public insecure FTP website and downloaded by investigators including Seattle's Bev Harris.

The whitewash proposal has been coordinated in association with the Election Center – a seemingly chimerous body coordinating Secretaries of State in the United States and which works closely with the body tasked with certifying the electronic voting machine certifiers.

This morning by phone Voting machine companies from all over the United States (and remember this is a NZD$8 billion + market) were asked for $200,000, to provide a full service public relations assault. It includes proposals to retain a pet think tank and for funding public opinion polls to press the agenda of the manufacturers that electronic voting machines are safe for democracy.

The document proposes to aggressively sell the notion that voting via a computer is the "gold standard" for any democracy to aspire to.

Significantly the plan does not suggest the voting industry convene a group to actually make computer voting the gold standard, though it does suggest cooperation on –non-competitive issues. Rather the clear thrust of the proposal is to simply finance the creation of a public impression of safety.

Also significantly, no mention in the document is made of "Verifiable Paper Trails" a cheap and effective solution to the problem of potentially hackable electronic voting machines backed by a growing group of eminent computer scientists led by David Dill of Stanford University.

This morning in the phone conference. Details of which will follow in subsequent report. One participant commented that if David Dill was involved in the efforts to influence the standards, "I'm sure noone would want to play."

**********

See below…

… for the full text of a public relations campaign proposal to clean up the Diebold E-voting stink proposed by the Information Technology Association of America (ITAA) to players in the multi-billion dollar voting machine manufacturing business today.

The proposal was written by Michael Kerr of the Enterprise Solutions division of the ITAA on Wednesday. It calls for commitments of up to USD$200,000 by August 29th, next Friday.

*************

ITAA eVoting Industry Coalition
DRAFT Plan, Activities, and Pricing

Purpose: Create confidence and trust in the elections industry and promote the adoption of technology-based solutions for the elections industry. Repair short-term damage done by negative reports and media coverage of electronic voting. Over the mid- to long-term, implement strategy that educates key constituencies about the benefits of public investments in electronic voting, voter registration and related applications.

Audience: Public confidence in the integrity of the ballot box is absolutely critical to the democratic process. To build such confidence, the vendor community must address several constituencies:

1. Media
2. Elected officials at the federal, state and local level
3. Elections administrators, procurement officials and others involved in the purchase decision
4. Academia
5. General public
6. International counterparts
7. Systems integrators and related government contractors


Success Benchmark: Achieve widespread acceptance among key constituencies that electronic voting is not just an alternative to other balloting systems, but is the "gold standard" to which all should aspire.


Model 1


Goals:

1. Help assure the integrity of IT used in the electronic voting process
2. Generate positive public perception of the eVoting industry
3. Speak with a unified voice on industry standards
4. Develop liaison with key constituencies in order to build broader support for e-voting
5. Improve security of technology and development/deployment processes
6. Improve public awareness of voting technology security
7. Reduce substantially the level and amount of criticism from computer scientists and other security experts about the fallibility of electronic voting systems.
8. Adopt an industry code of ethics

Generate collaborative research on non-competitive issues

Major Activities:

Deliverables

1. Establish Blue Ribbon Task Force to evaluate voting technology development and implementation processes, propose process improvements, and establish code of ethics.

2. Produce and publish collaborative research on non-competitive issues - 2 annual white papers.

3. Assess public attitudes about electronic voting on a regular basis through public opinion surveys, focus groups and other research.

4. Hold seminar/briefings/webcasts on Blue Ribbon Task Force findings, code of ethics launch, white paper releases.

5. Create comprehensive media plan to articulate key messages, identify outreach strategy and tactics, synchronize timing of media outreach to election milestones and other significant events, and raise visibility of issues, activities and the ITAA Election Systems Task Force itself.

6. Develop liaison to national associations, government oversight bodies, customer trade associations
a. Attend national conferences, work to add agenda items to programming
b. Arrange guests at briefings, monthly meetings, receptions
c. Arrange meetings with key government executives, lawmakers, staff.

7. Provide customer interface opportunities
a. Arrange guests at briefings, monthly meetings
b. Develop a regular dinner, reception program.


Regular Meetings/Events

1. Hold monthly meetings in Washington D.C. or Dallas area

2. Hold bi-annual full membership meetings


Fees in addition to annual dues: $100,000 - $125,000


Model 2


Goals:

Same as Model 1.

Plus: Perform a detailed evaluation of voting technology security standards and certification processes.


Major Activities:

Deliverables

1 - 7. Same as Model 1.

8. Retain consulting firm or think tank for review and evaluation of voting technology security standards and certification processes. Publish findings/recommendations.

Meeting/Events

1. Hold monthly meetings in Washington D.C. or Dallas area

2. Hold bi-annual full membership meetings


Fees in addition to annual dues: $125,000 - $150,000


Model 3

Goals:

Same as Models 1 and 2.

Plus: Perform a detailed evaluation of voting technology security standards and certification processes.

Plus: Re-engineer voting technology security standards and certification processes, based on findings in report.

Plus: Build media, public, and customer awareness of new security and certification processes.


Major Activities:

Deliverables

1 - 7. Same as Models 1 and 2.

8. Retain consulting firm/think tank for review and evaluation of voting technology security standards and certification processes. Publish findings and recommendations.

9. Implement report findings/recommendations; re-engineer security standards and certification processes.

10. Launch public relations campaign to build media, customer, and public awareness of new security and certification processes.

Meeting/Events

1. Hold monthly meetings in Washington D.C. or Dallas area

2. Hold bi-annual full membership meetings


Fees in addition to annual dues: $200,000+


Schedule

With the Iowa caucuses (and therefore the start of the primary season) only five months away, time is exceedingly short to implement this plan. Americans must have full faith in the efficacy of the election systems infrastructure. Numerous factors, including the overarching need to conduct the 2004 election with no “hanging chad” controversies, suggest that work commence with a minimum of delay.

ITAA recommends the following schedule of major milestones to bootstrap this effort:

August 29 ITAA membership applications have been completed by the core group of election
systems companies

September 3 Election Systems Task Force conducts teleconference to review and refine plan

September 12 Plan is approved, work groups established and implementation begins

September 22 Invitations tendered to candidates for “Blue Ribbon” Board; media plan circulated

September 30 First public opinion survey goes into field

October 14 Launch event to report survey findings, announce task force, blue ribbon board


Conclusions

ITAA is ready, willing and able to work with firms in the election systems sector to build and, as necessary, restore, a high degree of confidence in the integrity of e-voting and related applications. ITAA provides an ideal forum to undertake this program, offering:

1. a sophisticated government affairs and public relations apparatus;
2. over 20 years of industry engagement in public sector contracting;
3. the premier trade association membership of contractors involved in the federal systems marketplace;
4. an on-going state and local advocacy program;
5. an existing Election Systems Task Force and internal staff resources well schooled in the underlying issues;
6. and a track record of lobbying for federal funding to upgrade state and local electronic systems.

ITAA applauds the companies involved at the Election Center meeting for having the vision and determination to address the current doubts about election systems on an industry basis. Working together, ITAA believes that these companies have already taken the first step to meeting the common challenge.

**********

For More Information

For more media resources and links concerning the ITAA, The Election Center and R. Doug Lewis the proponents of this campaign - see the following companion Sludge Report. See also http://www.blackboxvoting.com http://www.blackboxvoting.com for more breaking making news on this subject.

Anti©opyright Sludge 2003

© Scoop Media

 
 
 
 
 
Top Scoops Headlines

 

Julienne Molineaux: Stuff-Me - The Newspaper Gobble-Up

In New Zealand, concentration of newspaper ownership via mergers and acquisitions has a long pre-digital history. The trends of declining readership and fragmented audiences began before digital content, and mergers and acquisitions proceeded apace, enabled by weak legislative protections. More>>

ALSO:

Scoop Foundation Membership Drive:

The Scoop Foundation: The best chance to create an independent guardian for public interest journalism in NZ

The Scoop Foundation is seeking public support to safeguard the future of public interest journalism in New Zealand. To ensure public access to comprehensive, free, timely news is maintained during this dark hour for journalism. And to provide every voice in NZ the opportunity to be heard in the national debate. More>>
PLEDGE NOW: Journalism: A New Model - The 2016 Scoop Foundation Membership Drive

Scoop Foundation Timeline:

Gordon Campbell: On Trump And The Madman Theory

Years ago, Richard Nixon explained to his chief adviser Bob Haldeman what has since become known as the “Madman Theory” of foreign policy. Basically, if America’s rivals could be reminded that Nixon was an unstable, rabid anti-Communist with his finger on the nuclear trigger, Nixon reasoned, then maybe they’d be less willing to challenge the US in the world’s hot spots… More>>

Australia And The South China Sea: Another Foreign Policy Blunder Looming

James O’Neill: The overblown rhetoric from the United States has led at least one commentator to describe so-called ‘analyses’ of the South China Sea situation as “the biggest load of analytical rubbish about South East Asia to emerge since the CIA mistook bee feces for a Soviet-supplied biological weapon in 1981.” More>>

People's Candidates: A Peaceful Political Revolution Begins In France

Alastair Thompson profiles Philippe Mazuel one of 86 largely unknown political contenders who stepped up to become the "People's Candidate" for France's 2017 Presidential election. More>>

Gordon Campbell: On Whether Donald Trump Has Peaked

Perhaps come August, when the Republicans will finally get to anoint their candidate at their convention in Cleveland, Trump’s fortunes will have waned and the delegate count will be sufficiently deadlocked as to create a ‘contested convention’ whereby the party might then be able to turn to a different, dark horse candidate… Dream on. More>>

ALSO:

Get More From Scoop

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Top Scoops
Search Scoop  
 
 
Powered by Vodafone
NZ independent news