Book Reviews | Gordon Campbell | News Flashes | Scoop Features | Scoop Video | Strange & Bizarre | Search

 


Health System Funding Already 'Needs Based'

Health System Funding Already 'Needs Based'


Op-ed piece in Dominion Post 9 March 2004
By Peter Crampton

Need and ethnicity are already co-habiting in our health funding system. ‘Socioeconomic deprivation’ and ‘ethnicity’ feature as two of the five main factors that dictate need and how health dollars are currently spent.

Both factors matter, says the existing system. Not as much as the fundamental measure, population size, nor age and gender, but they are important parts of the equation. That’s the equation that is used when New Zealand calculates our needs-based health funding system. The one we’ve run, in one form or another, for the last ten years. The previous funding system, based on the 19th century location of hospitals, had evolved in a way that unfairly penalised fast growing regions like Auckland.

Fundamentally, our health system is based on the principle that we spend most health dollars on the people who need most care. That allows for everyone to be looked after without bankrupting the nation.

Figure: socioeconomic deprivation and ethnicity are both important for life expectancy

To make that actually work in reality there need to be formulas. Currently, the money flows this way: the Ministry of Health funds District Health Boards using a population- and needs-based formula, ie they get a certain number of dollars per head, adjusted on a ‘needs basis’. The DHBs then fund Primary Health Organisations (like GPs and nurses) using more of the same kind of needs-based formulas.

The main factors that affect the money allocations are:

1. Population size (this gives a base-line ‘per head’ allowance)

2. Age structure of the population (adjustments for greater needs in the old and very young)

3. Gender (adjustments for greater needs in women in their child-bearing years)

4. Socioeconomic deprivation (adjustments for greater needs in people living in socioeconomically deprived areas)

5. Ethnicity (adjustments for greater needs in Maori and Pacific populations).

Ideally it would be nice not to have to use such clunky things as formulas with complicated weightings of generalised factors like these. But in the absence of detailed accurate health data for every person in New Zealand, they are what we have to work with.

Some of the factors used to spread the money don’t generally raise eyebrows. Who would object to the very old, babies and pregnant or new mothers getting more of the kitty. Instead, the focus of recent debate has been on the relative importance of socioeconomic deprivation and ethnicity. The calls for the emphasis to be on socioeconomic factors is well-founded: for well over a century, researchers have demonstrated a strong link between poverty and (poor) health – this association is unlikely to go away in the foreseeable future (although needs-based funding should help reduce inequalities).

But the recent public debate has tended to miss the fact that in contemporary New Zealand, ethnicity is an important measure of need, even after socioeconomic deprivation is taken into account – see graph showing life expectancy by deprivation and ethnicity. This shows, as also recently reported by Dr Tony Blakely, that Maori people can expect to die earlier than European New Zealanders who have similar levels of socioeconomic deprivation. In the future, hopefully this won’t be the case. Then, when the health status of all ethnic groups is similar, we can drop ethnicity out of the formulas.

In the end the health system can only do so much to change the extent of health care needs – our health status. For that we rely on the economy, high employment rates, the education system, good housing and the myriad other factors that create healthy populations. But we do expect the health system to respond to our health care needs, – it is the ambulance at the bottom of the cliff… and the ambulance needs to be funded to respond to the needs of everyone, and to respond the most to those that have the greatest levels of sickness.

ENDS

© Scoop Media

 
 
 
 
 
Top Scoops Headlines

 

Werewolf: Living With Rio’s Olympic Ruins

Mariana Cavalcanti Critics of the Olympic project can point a discernible pattern in the delivery of Olympics-related urban interventions: the belated but rushed inaugurations of faulty and/or unfinished infrastructures... More>>

Live Blog On Now: Open Source//Open Society Conference

The second annual Open Source Open Society Conference is a 2 day event taking place on 22-23 August 2016 at Michael Fowler Centre in Wellington… Scoop is hosting a live blog summarising the key points of this exciting conference. More>>

ALSO:

Buildup:

Gordon Campbell: On The Politicising Of The War On Drugs In Sport

It hasn’t been much fun at all to see how “war on drugs in sport” has become a proxy version of the Cold War, fixated on Russia. This weekend’s banning of the Russian long jumper Darya Klishina took that fixation to fresh extremes. More>>

ALSO:

Binoy Kampmark: Kevin Rudd’s Failed UN Secretary General Bid

Few sights are sadder in international diplomacy than seeing an aging figure desperate for honours. In a desperate effort to net them, he scurries around, cultivating, prodding, wishing to be noted. Finally, such an honour is netted, in all likelihood just to shut that overly keen individual up. More>>

Open Source / Open Society: The Scoop Foundation - An Open Model For NZ Media

Access to accurate, relevant and timely information is a crucial aspect of an open and transparent society. However, in our digital society information is in a state of flux with every aspect of its creation, delivery and consumption undergoing profound redefinition... More>>

Keeping Out The Vote: Gordon Campbell On The US Elections

I’ll focus here on just two ways that dis-enfranchisement is currently occurring in the US: (a) by the rigging of the boundary lines for voter districts and (b) by demanding elaborate photo IDs before people are allowed to cast their vote. More>>

Ramzy Baroud: Being Black Palestinian - Solidarity As A Welcome Pathology

It should come as no surprise that the loudest international solidarity that accompanied the continued spate of the killing of Black Americans comes from Palestine; that books have already been written and published by Palestinians about the plight of their Black brethren. In fact, that solidarity is mutual. More>>

ALSO:


Get More From Scoop

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Top Scoops
Search Scoop  
 
 
Powered by Vodafone
NZ independent news