Book Reviews | Gordon Campbell | News Flashes | Scoop Features | Scoop Video | Strange & Bizarre | Search

 


Bush And His Advisors Vulnerable To Prison Terms

Distribution via the Unanswered Questions Wire
Sign up for the wire at:
http://www.unansweredquestions.org/headlines.php
Unanswered Questions : Thinking for ourselves.

If Kerry Wins, Bush And His Advisors Know That They Are Vulnerable To Potential Prison Terms


A BUZZFLASH EDITORIAL
From: http://www.buzzflash.com/editorial/04/04/edi04024.html

As Americans are burned and desecrated by "liberated" Iraqis, revelations about the Bush administration's "slash and burn" campaign against patriot Richard Clarke continue to emerge. The Washington Post revealed that White House Legal Counsel Alberto Gonzales [Washington Post] placed calls to some Republican members of the 9/11 Commission before they tried to discredit Clarke.

Of course, FOX News, the White House television propaganda outlet, distributed information to GOP members of the panel around the same time, aimed at undermining Clarke's veracity. Meanwhile an MSNBC online news report, since removed, quoted a White House source as indicating that the CIA would look through Clarke's 2002 testimony to cherry pick what would be declassified "with an eye toward pointing out contradictions."

Even the much-headlined retreat by the Bush Politburo to "allow" Rice to testify under oath is less than it appears. No other administration official will be called before the panel under oath, as part of the agreement to obtain Rice -- and Bush and Cheney -- like the dummy and his ventriloquist -- will appear before the commission together and in private. Of course, this is designed to prevent the two of them from contradicting each other -- and to allow Cheney to be close enough to Bush that the commission members won't see him pulling the strings when George W. talks.

But you can bet, Cheney will be doing most of the lying for the two of them.

What's more, if the commission finds it needs to question Rice a second time, because of the myriad lies and contradictions that are likely to emerge from her sworn testimony, it has already waived that right.

And these are just some of the Soviet-style, abuse of governmental party tactics that have emerged about just ONE of the Bush Cartel efforts to smear and slime anyone who dares to tell the truth about how this administration has betrayed the nation.

As we mentioned in a previous editorial, don't expect much in the way of the 9/11 Commission outing the truth about the failure of the Bush Cartel to protect America from 9/11. It is a political body composed of Republicans and Democrats that will devise a politically compromised set of final conclusions. As we have also noted, there are more than enough facts and damning admissions by the Bush administration itself to come to the conclusion, without a 9/11 Commission, that the Bush Cartel at a minimum incompetently ignored repeated and urgent pleas to try and prevent a terrorist attack on our nation.

But beyond that, there is also emerging a possibility far more sinister. It is the theory that dares not be spoken because it implies such an unbelievable form of treason, the mention of it is still only tolerated on the fringe edge of conspiracy theories. This is, of course, the notion that some radical zealots in the Bush Administration deliberately ignored the threats of a terrorist attack -- perhaps not fully realizing its intended scale -- in order to receive the mandate to attack Iraq, seize its oil and install permanent military bases (14 to be exact). And that Iraq was meant to be only the first step in a plan to expand our military reach, force regime change in nations that resisted U.S. influence, and seize natural resources wherever possible.

Does BuzzFlash subscribe to such thinking? Let's just say that we are closer to entertaining such a possibility than we were a few months back. Anyone who connects the factually verifiable dots, not the Bush bullying and lying, would be hard put to rule it out, as extreme as the idea once appeared.

Which brings us to election 2004.

Although we have generally been impressed with signs that John Kerry and other Democrats are beginning to show some backbone and willingness to tell it like it is about the disreputable and chronic dishonesty of the White House and the Republican leadership, the stakes call for even more courage than what we have seen thus far.

On any number of fronts, it is apparent that senior members of the Bush Administration -- as well as many staffers -- would be likely to face criminal investigation and prosecution were they to be voted out of office. The shredding machines couldn't work fast enough at the White House to destroy the evidence concerning a variety of likely Bush Cartel legal transgressions. And with just a bit of prosecutorial power, particularly if the Democrats reclaim either House of Congress, many members of the Bush Cartel -- including Bush and Cheney -- could theoretically face years of legal probes into its countless betrayals, deceptions, lies and abuse of power.

When your back is to the wall and you know that you might face a prison term if you lose, you fight like a street brawler wearing brass knuckles and using everything at your disposal, including electronic voting software and the judicial system, to stay in office.

We've warned John Kerry in a previous editorial about not letting Bush define his character, as they successfully defamed Al Gore. Kerry has been slow to listen to us. Already polls indicate that Karl Rove's character assassination of Kerry is trumping the latest round of news about how Bush and his crew did nothing to protect us from 9/11, even though they were warned that it was imminent.

But here's something even more sinister for Kerry to contemplate.

The Bush Cartel is going to fight this election as if their backs are to the wall, because they are.

If Kerry wins, Bush and his advisors know that they are vulnerable to potential prison terms.

That means that they are going to slander Kerry, potentially break laws and steal to win. These are people who think that their lying and abuse of our government is "heroic" because they believe that they are imparted with some elitist notion that they know what is best for this nation.

And that is not a far-fetched theory.

It is happening before our very eyes.

After all, this is an administration that stole one election already.

A BUZZFLASH EDITORIAL

****************

STANDARD DISCLAIMER FROM UQ.ORG: UnansweredQuestions.org does not necessarily endorse the views expressed in the above article. We present this in the interests of research -for the relevant information we believe it contains. We hope that the reader finds in it inspiration to work with us further, in helping to build bridges between our various investigative communities, towards a greater, common understanding of the unanswered questions which now lie before us.


© Scoop Media

 
 
 
 
 
Top Scoops Headlines

 

Werewolf: Living With Rio’s Olympic Ruins

Mariana Cavalcanti Critics of the Olympic project can point a discernible pattern in the delivery of Olympics-related urban interventions: the belated but rushed inaugurations of faulty and/or unfinished infrastructures... More>>

Live Blog On Now: Open Source//Open Society Conference

The second annual Open Source Open Society Conference is a 2 day event taking place on 22-23 August 2016 at Michael Fowler Centre in Wellington… Scoop is hosting a live blog summarising the key points of this exciting conference. More>>

ALSO:

Buildup:

Gordon Campbell: On The Politicising Of The War On Drugs In Sport

It hasn’t been much fun at all to see how “war on drugs in sport” has become a proxy version of the Cold War, fixated on Russia. This weekend’s banning of the Russian long jumper Darya Klishina took that fixation to fresh extremes. More>>

ALSO:

Binoy Kampmark: Kevin Rudd’s Failed UN Secretary General Bid

Few sights are sadder in international diplomacy than seeing an aging figure desperate for honours. In a desperate effort to net them, he scurries around, cultivating, prodding, wishing to be noted. Finally, such an honour is netted, in all likelihood just to shut that overly keen individual up. More>>

Open Source / Open Society: The Scoop Foundation - An Open Model For NZ Media

Access to accurate, relevant and timely information is a crucial aspect of an open and transparent society. However, in our digital society information is in a state of flux with every aspect of its creation, delivery and consumption undergoing profound redefinition... More>>

Keeping Out The Vote: Gordon Campbell On The US Elections

I’ll focus here on just two ways that dis-enfranchisement is currently occurring in the US: (a) by the rigging of the boundary lines for voter districts and (b) by demanding elaborate photo IDs before people are allowed to cast their vote. More>>

Ramzy Baroud: Being Black Palestinian - Solidarity As A Welcome Pathology

It should come as no surprise that the loudest international solidarity that accompanied the continued spate of the killing of Black Americans comes from Palestine; that books have already been written and published by Palestinians about the plight of their Black brethren. In fact, that solidarity is mutual. More>>

ALSO:


Get More From Scoop

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Top Scoops
Search Scoop  
 
 
Powered by Vodafone
NZ independent news