Book Reviews | Gordon Campbell | News Flashes | Scoop Features | Scoop Video | Strange & Bizarre | Search


Jim Peron: Atrocities And The Mentality Of War

Atrocities And The Mentality Of War

by Jim Peron

There are times that the world is a horrific place. And we've witnessed two events that can turn the biggest optimist about the human condition into a pessimist. One was the abuse of Iraqi prisoners filmed and photographed by gleeful US military personnel. The other was the monstrous beheading on film, of Nicholas Berg, a US civilian who went to Iraq because he wanted to help a developing country.

The people of the United States seem in shock over the revelations of the abuse at Abu Ghraib prison outside Baghdad. Why?

Such abuse is the inevitable result of war. War requires the dehumanising of others. When you recognise the humanity of another person it's hard to kill them and war requires that you kill. When you send troops out to kill the enemy you must desensitise them to the human qualities of the people they are fighting.

It is one reason that war must always be the last resort and why it must be tightly controlled when it does happen. It is easy to lose one's moral compass during conflict. Yet it is precisely at such times that one needs that compass the most. But the nature of war is such that during conflictmany people advocate throwing away that compass because of real or imagined threats.

Lunatics who advocate dropping nuclear weapons to inflict maximum civilian damage in Muslim nations are an example of people who have thrown out the moral compass altogether. Oddly the people who do it aremost likely to proclaim themselves morally superior to everyone else. That leads to the fanaticism that was behind the beheading of Berg.

Those who did this monstrous deed exhibited the worst face of humanity. To wave the man's head in the air while proclaiming "God is Great" shows the mindset of the fundamentalist.

The fundamentalist is someone always at war with his fellow human beings. He hates this world and prefers either the "next world" or some imaginedutopia. He feels that he is endowed with some superior morality. Like the soldiers abusing prisoners at Abu Ghraib the fundamentalist needs to dehumanise his "enemies". One trait of the fundamentalist is that he always has enemies. He needs them. He thrives on them. And if they don't actually exist he will invent them.

Soldiers are taught to kill. And they are taught not to see the "enemy" as human. In military training films you'll see soldiers charging dummies that are nothing more than big sacks of cloth in a human form. The purpose is to desensitise the soldier to ramming a bayonet into a human form. Slowly and consistently the soldier learns to ignore the human nature of his opponent.

So too the fundamentalist. Read the literature of such groups. And I don't care if they are Islamic fundamentalists, Jewish fundamentalists or Christian fundamentalists. Hell, there are even secular fundamentalists who exhibit the same hateful traits.

Every bigot I've ever meet justifies their bigotry on the basis of some superior sense of moral virtue which they claim to possess. Every one of them tries to deny the humanity of the people they hate. The Nazi calls Jews "kikes", the anti globalist Leftist calls businessmen "exploiters". People cease being people when hate is involved. They are "niggers", "faggots", "vermin", "terrorists", "pigs", "scum", "maggots" or a host of other degrading terms.

Why degrading terms? For the same reason that soldiers bayonet a sack of cloth before moving on to killing people. This process of dehumanising others allows you throw away that moral compass. It justifies doing anything to destroy, maim, kill, or harm your "enemy". You can't wage war easily on people when you see them as human beings.

The process of war making and the fundamentalist mentality are very similar. Both inevitably lead to the abandoning of all human decency.

I think that what has particular shocked the American people is that many of them believed the lies of the Bush Administration. When you know you are going to war you know that the "enemy" will be seen as less than human and you know that means they will inevitably be treated as less than human. But Bush sold the public a bill of goods. He told them this was to "liberate the Iraqi people" from oppression.

In their hearts and minds many Americans did not see this as a war in the classic sense of the term. For them it was a liberation of oppressed people. So they didn't expect this sort of thing to happen. But such abuses, and far worse, have happened in every war that I can think of. And such atrocities have been perpetrated by virtually all those participating. That's one cost of war and one reason why war is rarely a good idea.

- Jim Peron is the executive director of the Institute for Liberal Values.

© Scoop Media

Top Scoops Headlines


Werewolf: Living With Rio’s Olympic Ruins

Mariana Cavalcanti Critics of the Olympic project can point a discernible pattern in the delivery of Olympics-related urban interventions: the belated but rushed inaugurations of faulty and/or unfinished infrastructures... More>>

Live Blog On Now: Open Source//Open Society Conference

The second annual Open Source Open Society Conference is a 2 day event taking place on 22-23 August 2016 at Michael Fowler Centre in Wellington… Scoop is hosting a live blog summarising the key points of this exciting conference. More>>



Gordon Campbell: On The Politicising Of The War On Drugs In Sport

It hasn’t been much fun at all to see how “war on drugs in sport” has become a proxy version of the Cold War, fixated on Russia. This weekend’s banning of the Russian long jumper Darya Klishina took that fixation to fresh extremes. More>>


Binoy Kampmark: Kevin Rudd’s Failed UN Secretary General Bid

Few sights are sadder in international diplomacy than seeing an aging figure desperate for honours. In a desperate effort to net them, he scurries around, cultivating, prodding, wishing to be noted. Finally, such an honour is netted, in all likelihood just to shut that overly keen individual up. More>>

Open Source / Open Society: The Scoop Foundation - An Open Model For NZ Media

Access to accurate, relevant and timely information is a crucial aspect of an open and transparent society. However, in our digital society information is in a state of flux with every aspect of its creation, delivery and consumption undergoing profound redefinition... More>>

Keeping Out The Vote: Gordon Campbell On The US Elections

I’ll focus here on just two ways that dis-enfranchisement is currently occurring in the US: (a) by the rigging of the boundary lines for voter districts and (b) by demanding elaborate photo IDs before people are allowed to cast their vote. More>>

Ramzy Baroud: Being Black Palestinian - Solidarity As A Welcome Pathology

It should come as no surprise that the loudest international solidarity that accompanied the continued spate of the killing of Black Americans comes from Palestine; that books have already been written and published by Palestinians about the plight of their Black brethren. In fact, that solidarity is mutual. More>>


Get More From Scoop

Top Scoops
Search Scoop  
Powered by Vodafone
NZ independent news