UQ Wire: Sibel Edmonds Sues Ashcroft Again
Sign up for the wire at:
Unanswered Questions : Thinking for ourselves.
Sibel Edmonds Sues Ashcroft Again: Actions Tied To 9-11 Evidence
FBI whistleblower Sibel Edmonds sues Ashcroft and DOJ again, asserting that re-classification of her 9-11 allegations was illegal and unconstitutional
by Tom Flocco
IMAGE: Sibel Edmonds was fired for reporting information she uncovered in the FBI's translation unit in Washington. Attorney General Ashcroft said the national interests of the United States "would be seriously impaired" if Edmonds' findings were to be made available to the public; so he made the decision to classify public information still available on the Internet.
WASHINGTON -- June 24, 2004 2:45 pm -- TomFlocco.com -- On behalf of former FBI contract linguist Sibel Edmonds, The Project On Government Oversight (POGO) sued Attorney General John Ashcroft and the Department of Justice (DOJ) today, seeking judicial reclassification of information that alleges corruption, incompetence and cover-ups in an FBI investigation unit.
POGO, a politically independent non-profit government watchdog, is challenging Ashcroft’s information reclassification and concomitant invocation of State Secret Privilege in the withholding of certain information that is widely available to the public.
The information is related to Sibel Edmonds’ allegations
reported to her superiors concerning numerous instances of
wrongdoing in the FBI translation unit--much of it closely
linked to the World Trade Center attacks on September 11,
Georgetown University Law Center professor David Vladeck and Public Citizen are representing POGO in the civil action.
For Full Story See…
See also for further background earlier stories about Sibel Edmonds from Tomflocco.com:
Copyright © 2002, 2003, 2004 under the DMCA,
Permission is granted to reprint the first three paragraphs of this story; and websites are welcome to link to TomFlocco.com for the remaining pages. Allan Duncan contributed additional research for this story.
STANDARD DISCLAIMER FROM UQ.ORG: UnansweredQuestions.org does not necessarily endorse the views expressed in the above article. We present this in the interests of research -for the relevant information we believe it contains. We hope that the reader finds in it inspiration to work with us further, in helping to build bridges between our various investigative communities, towards a greater, common understanding of the unanswered questions which now lie before us.