Book Reviews | Gordon Campbell | News Flashes | Scoop Features | Scoop Video | Strange & Bizarre | Search

 


Doug Giebel: Rove's Reign Of Terror

Rove's Reign Of Terror


by Doug Giebel

In his convention acceptance speech, President George W. Bush used a variation of the word ''terror'' a mere sixteen times. A few days later, during a day's campaign appearances in Missouri, the Bush references to terror totalled forty-three, while during his infamous a-vote-for-Kerry-is-a-vote-for-a-terrorist-attack dialog in Iowa, Vice-President Cheney went called up the terror image twenty-three times, expanded one day later in a New Hampshire appearance to twenty-six.

After the criminal attacks of 9/11, fear and terror have been trump cards in the speech-making lexicon of the Bush Administration. It's as if the message is, "Be afraid. Be very afraid. But don't worry. We're here to protect you." The other guys, as Cheney let slip in Iowa, will bring on another attack. Not only must citizens fear the terrorists, they must (equally, perhaps) fear the Democrats -- especially John Kerry and John Edwards, candidates with a magnetic attraction to terrorism's evil nature.

Even Senator John McCain, embarrassed but doggedly pimping for the Bush-Cheney re-election, claims that terrorism poses the greatest threat to the nation's existence since . . . well, since ever. McCain's pony show is especially troubling, because the senator knows personally how vicious and cruel these no-holds-barred Bush campaigns can be. McCain and Kerry share a sorry characteristic: they both served with distinction during wartime, McCain especially so; but their years in the senate seem to have drained them of the courage to blow the whistle on wrongdoing--as Kerry did when he returned from Vietnam and reported on the horrors of war to those back home.

Behind this Bush-Cheney Reign of Terror is the Frankenstein genius of Karl Rove. As Wayne Slater and James C. Moore point out in their book and film "Bush's Brain," 'twas Rove who "created" George W. Bush the Politician, just as Mary Shelley's good doctor created his creature, proving there is no "self-made" man currently occupying the White House--unless it is the genius Karl Rove himself. Rove, perceptive student of history, knows about the earlier French "reign of terror" and its patrie en danger condition, precursor to our own cancerous Patriot Act. During the last election and the administration of George W. Bush, Rove's signature is on everything, but his fingerprints are nowhere to be found.

Each time John Kerry and John Edwards are put on the defensive by some surprise, such as the recent Swift Boat attack ads, Rove can be assumed to be somewhere behind the curtain pulling the strings. His proof of success, the envy of many ethically-challenged politicians and hack political operatives, is in the pudding he concocted by turning a black-sheep of the Bush family into a presidential swan. And yet one can not help but wonder if there is a limit to Rove's "How To Succeed" formula. Is it possible to go too far? Are the American people really as stupid and pliable as Rove's cynicism knows them to be? Will Karl Rove's swan take a swan dive in the end?

A signal part of the Rove-Terror strategy has been to raise the possibility of an imminent terrorist attack: on a holiday, at the Super Bowl, during the Democratic or the Republican Convention, just prior to the November election, or, as Cheney so clearly implied: if the American voters elect the Kerry-Edwards ticket. Although this hysteria-producing scenario has little or no basis in historical fact, it has enough plausibility to give less-thoughtful voters pause. "Oh, oh. I'd better vote for Bush and Cheney . . . Just in case." Of course if Bush and Cheney are re-elected and another terrorist attack occurs on U.S. soil, the blame can always be dumped on the Clintons, easy targets for vilification because of their high visibility and the hatred they engender in right-wing circles of compassionate conspiracy.

Another fear-of-terrorism hypothesis has been the prospect that a terrorist attack on the day of the November election causing the election to be postponed. A neat scenario if George W. Bush a far behind in the polls. One wonders if Rove has a plan, and the cheek, to pull it off. Although the cancellation of the election seems doubtful, one might imagine a situation where the impending threat of terrorism coupled with a move to red-orange alert could cancel one or more presidential debates. President Bush seems interested in limiting the number of debates to two, but with sufficient outcry from the public he will likely flip-flop and accept a third debate--unless the terrorism level and national safety require otherwise. There seems little doubt the current father of his nation of ten-year-olds considers re-election more important than trading words with an elite Brahman from (wink-wink) Massachusetts.

As I write this, the Swift Boat assault on John Kerry's reputation seems to have backfired as more evidence emerges of George W. Bush and his less-than-stellar performance in the National Guard. Still, Rove must have counted on having to deal with the problem, even though the mainstream media has been overly-timid about asking the right questions, such as: "Why would a young man trained as a jet pilot give up his opportunity to fly simply because he missed a physical examination?" "Why could the examination not have been re-scheduled?" "If George W. Bush was in Alabama, why couldn't he (a) take the physical there, or (b) catch a military or commercial flight back to Texas and complete the required examination?" The "evidence" may not be in the missing documents but in a generous application of good old American "common sense."

Terrorism, real terrorism, is a serious problem. It may be much more a criminal problem than one our military can resolve. There are no organized armies of terrorist hordes waiting to set sail in an armada to invade East Hampton, Arlington or the Mendocino coast. Only the most thoughtless pessimist would argue that terrorists, even if armed with "suitcase" weapons of mass destruction, could "bring down" the United States of America. It is not about to happen, whomever sits in the Oval Office or stalks the halls of the Pentagon. England was not destroyed by Hitler's wrath. Germany survived the horrific attacks on Dresden and Hamburg. The destruction of Leningrad did not wipe out the Soviet Union or the spirit of the Russian people. Japan, the one nation subjected to nuclear holocaust, survives today. Even Chechnya has not been brought to its knees, despite the murderous efforts of dictators from Stalin to Putin. Terrorists and terrorism are not about to wipe out the United States. Let's get real.

If Democrats are willing to "think outside the box" and stop quaking at every mention of the name "Karl Rove," the tables can be turned, the ethical vacuum known as Bush's Brain may be vanquished and America's new long self-imposed nightmare of fear and terror may end. Then Mr. Rove can finally join the private sector and amass the financial fortune he knows he so truly deserves.

***********

Doug Giebel is a writer and analyst who lives in Big Sandy, Montana. He will participate in a panel on October 23 human rights conference to be held on at Rutgers University (Camden Campus). He welcomes correspondence at dougcatz@ttc-cmc.net


© Scoop Media

 
 
 
 
 
Top Scoops Headlines

 

Werewolf: Living With Rio’s Olympic Ruins

Mariana Cavalcanti Critics of the Olympic project can point a discernible pattern in the delivery of Olympics-related urban interventions: the belated but rushed inaugurations of faulty and/or unfinished infrastructures... More>>

Live Blog On Now: Open Source//Open Society Conference

The second annual Open Source Open Society Conference is a 2 day event taking place on 22-23 August 2016 at Michael Fowler Centre in Wellington… Scoop is hosting a live blog summarising the key points of this exciting conference. More>>

ALSO:

Buildup:

Gordon Campbell: On The Politicising Of The War On Drugs In Sport

It hasn’t been much fun at all to see how “war on drugs in sport” has become a proxy version of the Cold War, fixated on Russia. This weekend’s banning of the Russian long jumper Darya Klishina took that fixation to fresh extremes. More>>

ALSO:

Binoy Kampmark: Kevin Rudd’s Failed UN Secretary General Bid

Few sights are sadder in international diplomacy than seeing an aging figure desperate for honours. In a desperate effort to net them, he scurries around, cultivating, prodding, wishing to be noted. Finally, such an honour is netted, in all likelihood just to shut that overly keen individual up. More>>

Open Source / Open Society: The Scoop Foundation - An Open Model For NZ Media

Access to accurate, relevant and timely information is a crucial aspect of an open and transparent society. However, in our digital society information is in a state of flux with every aspect of its creation, delivery and consumption undergoing profound redefinition... More>>

Keeping Out The Vote: Gordon Campbell On The US Elections

I’ll focus here on just two ways that dis-enfranchisement is currently occurring in the US: (a) by the rigging of the boundary lines for voter districts and (b) by demanding elaborate photo IDs before people are allowed to cast their vote. More>>

Ramzy Baroud: Being Black Palestinian - Solidarity As A Welcome Pathology

It should come as no surprise that the loudest international solidarity that accompanied the continued spate of the killing of Black Americans comes from Palestine; that books have already been written and published by Palestinians about the plight of their Black brethren. In fact, that solidarity is mutual. More>>

ALSO:


Get More From Scoop

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Top Scoops
Search Scoop  
 
 
Powered by Vodafone
NZ independent news