Top Scoops

Book Reviews | Gordon Campbell | Scoop News | Wellington Scoop | Community Scoop | Search


Meditations: Addressing Evolution’s Error

Meditations - From Martin LeFevre in California

Addressing Evolution’s Error

Pierre Teilhard de Chardin was a paleontologist and Jesuit priest who believed humankind represents a milestone in an ascending evolution of all life. His work is a touchstone for thinkers on the meaning and future of humanity. Rarely has a thinker been so right and so wrong at the same time.

Given the madhouse that the world has become, Teilhard’s notion of humankind being a “thinking layer,” or “noosphere,” covering the planet seems like a bad joke. On the other hand, his reflections on evolution as being more than just a random, mechanical process are gaining more serious attention, even by scientists who have long derided his poetically expressed ideas.

Here is an example of Teilhard’s boundless optimism about the human condition and prospect: "A glow rippled outward from the first spark of conscious reflection. The point of ignition grows larger. The fire spreads in ever-widening circles, till finally the whole planet is covered with incandescence."

Even 30 years ago, as a young man passionately pursuing studies in what philosophy calls “theories of human nature,” I found such pronouncements wildly off the mark. My inquiry began with the question: Given that nature moves in a dynamic order, and that humans evolved along with all other life, how is it that humankind could become such a force of disorder and destructiveness to the entire planet?

At a time when our wired world instantaneously carries the information that hundreds of children have been shot in the back in an escalating “global war on terror,” the idea of the incandescent glow of human consciousness is beyond absurd. And yet, the darker things get, the closer human consciousness may be getting to a breakthrough.

At best, Teilhard totally missed a step in evolution—the misstep that is ‘man.’ But how could nature make such a mistake? And is understanding and resolving evolution’s error potentially part of the process of breaking through to the next stage of consciousness?

The contemplative in me agrees with Teilhard when he says that there is an intrinsic intent within all matter and energy to evolve a brain capable of awareness of Mind. However human consciousness as we know it, based on memory and thought, is increasingly destructive and unsustainable. In order to awaken the awareness of Mind, content consciousness has to be negated by the individual through undivided observation of its movement within one.

Human chaos is of a completely different character than chaos in nature. The latter is inextricably part of an infinite order that includes a high degree of randomness. The former is marked by an increasing degeneration and deterioration, culminating now in a planetary crisis that only a transmutation in consciousness can resolve. Obviously this insight, if true, turns the entire idea of human progress with regard to civilization (as opposed to science and technology) on its head.

Consciousness as humans have known it for over 100,000 years (with very few exceptions) has reached its life-threatening and logical end. Humankind is imperiling not only itself, but also the very viability of the biosphere. In addition, the logical end of content/information consciousness is the computers that we are making as analogs of that consciousness.

There is another kind of consciousness altogether available to the human being, but it isn’t just going to drop into our heads. Each person has to do his or her own spadework to make the breakthrough. Content consciousness is derived from and turns on memory; insight consciousness derives from and turns on direct perception of what is, which illuminates what is.

Teilhard’s notion of a “noosphere” as a “thinking layer” of the biosphere now seems almost willfully naïve. Humankind represents a deep error in evolution, which only we, by awakening insight within ourselves, can put right.

Evolution’s error is not ‘man’ or ‘higher thought’ per se, but the inherent tendency of symbolic thought to divide, grow like a cancer, and fragment the world all to hell. Progressive evolution is therefore an illusion of the highest order.

It follows that the computer and the Internet aren’t more layers in “the ascension of inner sap spreading out in a forest of consolidated instincts,” as Teilhard turgidly put it. Rather, together they are the ultimate expression of content consciousness, which threatens to engulf everyone in a ‘matrix’ of information control.

The alternative to the real and present danger of losing one’s humanity is radical change through self-knowing, which frees the brain to be aware of, and even participate in ongoing creation. What a time to be alive!


- Martin LeFevre is a contemplative, and non-academic religious and political philosopher. He has been publishing in North America, Latin America, Africa, and Europe (and now New Zealand) for 20 years. Email: The author welcomes comments.

© Scoop Media

Top Scoops Headlines


Veronika Meduna: The Kaikoura Rebuild

A Scoop Foundation Investigation The South Island’s main transport corridor will be open to traffic again, more than a year after a magnitude 7.8 earthquake mangled bridges and tunnels, twisted rail tracks and buried sections of the road under massive landslides. More>>

Charlotte Graham: Empowering Communities To Act In A Disaster
The year of record-breaking natural disasters means that in the US, as in New Zealand, there’s a conversation happening about how best to run the emergency management sector... More>>


Jan Rivers: The New Zealanders Involved In Brexit

There are a number who have strong connections to New Zealand making significant running on either side of the contested and divisive decision to leave the European Union. More>>

Rawiri Taonui: The Rise, Fall And Future Of The Independent Māori Parties

Earlier this month the Māori Party and Mana Movement reflected on the shock loss of their last parliamentary seat in this year’s election. It is timely to consider their future. More>>

Don Rennie: Is It Time To Take ACC Back To First Principles?

The word “investing” has played a major part in the operations of the ACC since 1998... More>>

Using Scoop Professionally? Introducing ScoopPro

ScoopPro is a new offering aimed at ensuring professional users get the most out of Scoop and support us to continue improving it so that Scoop continues to exist as a public service for all New Zealanders. More>>