Book Reviews | Gordon Campbell | News Flashes | Scoop Features | Scoop Video | Strange & Bizarre | Search

 


Nothing To Fear But Self-Imposed Fear Itself

Nothing To Fear But Self-Imposed Fear Itself


By Steven Hass
From: http://www.newzmaniac.com/opinion11.html

To put it mildly, Americans live in a ''climate of fear''. In a peculiar twist, the rest of the world has somehow escaped this fate, at least in comparison to how deeply Americans have settled into this abyss. What are Americans so fearful of that the rest of the world is not? In the most general sense, the answer is simple: "terrorists". What's so hard to understand about Americans' monopoly on the fear of terrorists?

Well, to begin with, nobody has even defined exactly what or whom is meant by "terrorist". How can so many Americans fear something or someone when they don't even know what or whom they're afraid of? Such a fear, in such a degree as is normal today in America, obviously then is not based on fact, but on conditioning. More on this later.

Franklin Delano Roosevelt told us that we had nothing to fear but fear itself, and he was right. When a population subsists on a steady diet of fear, as has been the routine in America since September 11, 2001, fear becomes a paralyzer. The media, marching blindly to the drum of the Bush administration, ensures that citizens are confronted daily with "news" of terrorist activities, video clips of terrorist bombings, and any other information that can be attributed to what they call "terrorists". Compounding the mainstream media's dereliction of duty is the fact that this diet of fear is continuously being fed to a people who show little (if any) motivation to research anything they've been told by the mainstream media. Fear, in these quantities and presented to such a disinterested group, eventually paralyzes any inherent propensity for critical thought, research, and corrective action. This reluctance to gather facts then defines this climate of fear as being self-imposed. It shouldn't be as easy to accomplish as it's been, especially in America.

How have so many Americans been convinced to simply accept what they're told as though it were fact? That's an interesting question without an easy answer. Ask a large number of Americans if they fear "the terrorists", and you'll get a resounding "yes". Ask who these "terrorists" are, and you may get an "al-Qaeda" or "Osama bin Laden", but nothing beyond that. The fact is that this large group of Americans have no idea who they mean by "the terrorists". All they know is that they fear them, because they're constantly being told that we're all in great danger from these scary people.

An unfortunate, but predictable, result of this steady onslaught of sloppy "reporting" is that too many Americans use the term "terrorist" to describe those who are fighting the occupation and destruction of Iraq. These are the people who are feared so greatly. The problem is that many, if not most, of these Iraqi fighters have nothing to do with al-Qaeda or Osama bin Laden, yet Americans fear them as though they were Osama's own army. What is missed is what has become glaringly obvious: Iraqis, in general, do not want the American military in their country, they do not want the current (or any future) Iraqi puppet government, and most of them have no idea what a democracy is and thus can't possibly want one. The hypocricy of our invasion of Iraq is staggering, but lost on so many Americans, and is fodder for a much longer article.

Self-imposed fear only occurs by design, not by accident. It requires a calculated program of conditioning. Recalling the day after the attacks on September 11, 2001, it was incredible how quickly the Bush administration had pinned the tail not only on Osama bin Laden (which was correct), but also on Saddam Hussein and Iraq (which was almost laughably incorrect, to the extreme). Incredible, because on the day previous to September 11 nobody in the Bush administration acted as though they had even an inkling of the enormous attack that was coming, much less from whom. The day after, however, Bush and friends suddenly knew exactly who had done the deed. Red flags should have been popping up all over America, because this shows either an impossible overnight intelligence coup, or a predisposition for war in the Middle East. Instead, the program of conditioning was born, and apparently America was ripe for the picking.

In a classic show of history repeating itself, this exact formula worked in Germany in the 1930's. The destruction of the Reichstag was the catalyst for an intense propoganda program designed to make Germans believe they were in constant danger of attack. It worked like a charm, and Hitler was given free reign by the majority of German citizens to pursue his global agenda, because they had been programmed to believe he was protecting "der homeland". Perhaps the average German citizen can be forgiven for being susceptible to the propoganda machine, because information sources were at a premium in those days. Options for news were few, and what options were available were controlled by the German government. The same cannot be said for America in the 21st-century, alive with the internet.

When fear is not based on fact, and therefore is based on conditioning, there is obviously a dangerous problem. This self-imposed fear grants an enormous amount of unchecked power to an extremely small group of people. Fear is a very powerful emotion. Nobody in America understands this more clearly than this small group of very powerful people. To quote Adolph Hitler's own second-in-command, Hermann Goerring, "...it is always a simple matter to drag the people along, whether it is a democracy, or a fascist dictatorship, or a parliament, or a communist dictatorship. Voice or no voice, the people can always be brought to the bidding of the leaders. That is easy. All you have to do is tell them they are being attacked, and denounce the peacemakers for lack of patriotism and exposing the country to danger. It works the same in any country."

It shouldn't work in 21st-century America, of all places, but it's been far too easy to "drag the people along".

*************

Steven A. Hass
Newzmaniac.com
desert_vet@msn.com


© Scoop Media

 
 
 
 
 
Top Scoops Headlines

 

Werewolf: Living With Rio’s Olympic Ruins

Mariana Cavalcanti Critics of the Olympic project can point a discernible pattern in the delivery of Olympics-related urban interventions: the belated but rushed inaugurations of faulty and/or unfinished infrastructures... More>>

Live Blog On Now: Open Source//Open Society Conference

The second annual Open Source Open Society Conference is a 2 day event taking place on 22-23 August 2016 at Michael Fowler Centre in Wellington… Scoop is hosting a live blog summarising the key points of this exciting conference. More>>

ALSO:

Buildup:

Gordon Campbell: On The Politicising Of The War On Drugs In Sport

It hasn’t been much fun at all to see how “war on drugs in sport” has become a proxy version of the Cold War, fixated on Russia. This weekend’s banning of the Russian long jumper Darya Klishina took that fixation to fresh extremes. More>>

ALSO:

Binoy Kampmark: Kevin Rudd’s Failed UN Secretary General Bid

Few sights are sadder in international diplomacy than seeing an aging figure desperate for honours. In a desperate effort to net them, he scurries around, cultivating, prodding, wishing to be noted. Finally, such an honour is netted, in all likelihood just to shut that overly keen individual up. More>>

Open Source / Open Society: The Scoop Foundation - An Open Model For NZ Media

Access to accurate, relevant and timely information is a crucial aspect of an open and transparent society. However, in our digital society information is in a state of flux with every aspect of its creation, delivery and consumption undergoing profound redefinition... More>>

Keeping Out The Vote: Gordon Campbell On The US Elections

I’ll focus here on just two ways that dis-enfranchisement is currently occurring in the US: (a) by the rigging of the boundary lines for voter districts and (b) by demanding elaborate photo IDs before people are allowed to cast their vote. More>>

Ramzy Baroud: Being Black Palestinian - Solidarity As A Welcome Pathology

It should come as no surprise that the loudest international solidarity that accompanied the continued spate of the killing of Black Americans comes from Palestine; that books have already been written and published by Palestinians about the plight of their Black brethren. In fact, that solidarity is mutual. More>>

ALSO:


Get More From Scoop

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Top Scoops
Search Scoop  
 
 
Powered by Vodafone
NZ independent news