Book Reviews | Gordon Campbell | News Flashes | Scoop Features | Scoop Video | Strange & Bizarre | Search

 


More Going On In Fallujah Than Simple U.S. Victory

More Going On In Fallujah Than Simple U.S. Victory


by Mark W. Anderson
November 25, 2004
From: http://www.freepress.org/columns/display/13/2004/1005

Now that the smoke over Fallujah has cleared, and victory declared, let’s review:

War is wrong. Always has been, always will be.

Perhaps former President Jimmy Carter put it best when he concluded his acceptance speech for the 2002 Nobel Peace Prize by saying, “War may sometimes be a necessary evil. But no matter how necessary, it is always an evil, never a good. We will not learn how to live together in peace by killing each other’s children.”

Unfortunately, for the past couple of weeks, the U.S. military has been engaged in doing exactly that: killing other people’s children.

It may not seem like it, judging from the almost complete lack of truth-telling on the evening news, or the increasingly difficult to believe statements of the U.S. military that few, if any, civilians are being killed.

But, as part of its recent attempt to clean out “insurgents” from the Iraqi cities of Fallujah, Mosul and elsewhere, that’s what has been happening.

And civilians, perhaps hundreds or thousands of them, have been caught in the crossfire.

In case you haven’t been paying attention, the war in Iraq heated up quite a bit during the past few weeks, with American forces staging an all-out attack on Fallujah and conducting increased operations in perhaps a dozen other Iraqi cities. November is already the second-bloodiest month for U.S troops, with more than 100 soldiers killed.

The stated reason for the American military effort is simple: Loyalists from the old regime, coupled with newly arrived foreign fighters, are opposing U.S. efforts to bring a stable, free and democratic society to the people of Iraq by attacking American troops and threatening upcoming elections.

The rebels had taken over all of Fallujah and parts of other cities, turning them into “no-go zones” for U.S. troops, and the military decided it was time to take those areas back. Unfortunately, the way U.S. troops decided to take those areas back relied on the only weapon it had in its arsenal: massive, overwhelming firepower.

After days of heavy bombardment and air strikes from artillery and fighter jets, troops moved in with tanks and armored vehicles to engage in close, door-to-door fighting in a dense urban environment.

And while it hasn’t been examined in great detail here in the United States, the devastation U.S. forces have wrought seems to be significant.

On Nov. 15, Associated Press reporter Edward Harris quoted Sgt. Todd Bowers, a Marine civil affairs specialist, charged with planning reconstruction of the city, as saying “It’s incredible, the destruction. It’s overwhelming. My first question is: Where to begin?”

The news out of Fallujah—what little there is—paints a dire picture for anyone trapped inside.

There’s reportedly little food, water or electricity. A hospital in the center of the city was destroyed. Hundreds of buildings, including many mosques, have been razed. Harris reported that walls and security gates are laced with bullet holes, and Marines have blown holes in walls and knocked down doors to search homes and shops.

On the same day, the BBC reported that dead bodies lay decomposing in the streets. “It is starting to become a serious health risk,” said reporter Paul Wood. “It is quite a horrific picture … Cats and dogs are now starting to eat these bodies.”

The United States dropped leaflets on the city before the assault, warning the women and children to leave, which usually means a firestorm is coming. And an estimated three-quarters of the 200,000 to 300,000 inhabitants of the city fled, while others stayed behind.

But, acknowledging they had no way to distinguish between civilians and rebel fighters, males between the ages of 15 and 55 who were attempting to leave before the assault were required by U.S. forces to remain in the city.

Which means, despite attempts by the U.S. military to downplay the possibility, civilians were killed in Fallujah. Both the International Red Cross and Amnesty International expressed concern over those who remained, with a spokeswoman for Amnesty International telling the Associated Press, “According to what we’re hearing and some testimony from residents who have fled Fallujah, it looks like the toll of civilian casualties is high.”

And what of the children? They are suffering and dying. You won’t find them in the American media, but they’re there. You don’t eradicate a guerrilla insurgency in an ancient city through the use of tanks, heavy artillery and fighter jets and not kill some innocent bystanders.

The U.K. newspaper The Guardian reported in April that of the 600 civilian casualties resulting from an aborted attempt by the U.S. military to take back control of the city earlier this year, “the vast majority of the dead were women, children and the elderly.”

This time, it’s likely to be different only by degree.

And it’s worth noting, even though a large portion of the American population has helped justify the war in Iraq by believing Saddam Hussein was involved in the attack of 9/11, it’s simply not true.

What is true is that the civilians dying in Fallujah and elsewhere had nothing to do with that horrific day when America was attacked.

But the U.S. military killed them—and continues to, for all we know—just the same. In an effort, we say, to bring democracy to the long-oppressed people of Iraq.

That’s what we are doing, we tell ourselves.

And the evening news and the morning papers help us along in our beliefs, telling us that “the city is back under control” and “we’re clearing out the last of the rebel fighters.”

And that “we had no choice but to do what we did.”

But they don’t tell us that it’s wrong to kill other people’s children.

Or that war is evil, even if it’s American troops doing the killing.

*************

Mark W. Anderson is an independent journalist and writer based in Chicago. Visit him at http://thesentimentalist.com.


© Scoop Media

 
 
 
 
 
Top Scoops Headlines

 

Werewolf: Living With Rio’s Olympic Ruins

Mariana Cavalcanti Critics of the Olympic project can point a discernible pattern in the delivery of Olympics-related urban interventions: the belated but rushed inaugurations of faulty and/or unfinished infrastructures... More>>

Live Blog On Now: Open Source//Open Society Conference

The second annual Open Source Open Society Conference is a 2 day event taking place on 22-23 August 2016 at Michael Fowler Centre in Wellington… Scoop is hosting a live blog summarising the key points of this exciting conference. More>>

ALSO:

Buildup:

Gordon Campbell: On The Politicising Of The War On Drugs In Sport

It hasn’t been much fun at all to see how “war on drugs in sport” has become a proxy version of the Cold War, fixated on Russia. This weekend’s banning of the Russian long jumper Darya Klishina took that fixation to fresh extremes. More>>

ALSO:

Binoy Kampmark: Kevin Rudd’s Failed UN Secretary General Bid

Few sights are sadder in international diplomacy than seeing an aging figure desperate for honours. In a desperate effort to net them, he scurries around, cultivating, prodding, wishing to be noted. Finally, such an honour is netted, in all likelihood just to shut that overly keen individual up. More>>

Open Source / Open Society: The Scoop Foundation - An Open Model For NZ Media

Access to accurate, relevant and timely information is a crucial aspect of an open and transparent society. However, in our digital society information is in a state of flux with every aspect of its creation, delivery and consumption undergoing profound redefinition... More>>

Keeping Out The Vote: Gordon Campbell On The US Elections

I’ll focus here on just two ways that dis-enfranchisement is currently occurring in the US: (a) by the rigging of the boundary lines for voter districts and (b) by demanding elaborate photo IDs before people are allowed to cast their vote. More>>

Ramzy Baroud: Being Black Palestinian - Solidarity As A Welcome Pathology

It should come as no surprise that the loudest international solidarity that accompanied the continued spate of the killing of Black Americans comes from Palestine; that books have already been written and published by Palestinians about the plight of their Black brethren. In fact, that solidarity is mutual. More>>

ALSO:


Get More From Scoop

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Top Scoops
Search Scoop  
 
 
Powered by Vodafone
NZ independent news