Book Reviews | Gordon Campbell | News Flashes | Scoop Features | Scoop Video | Strange & Bizarre | Search

 


Data On Associated Press Tally Of "New" Votes

News: Election 2004: New Data on Associated Press Tally of "New" Votes Uncovered in Ohio Hand- and Machine-Recounts
The Nashua Advocate
By ADVOCATE STAFF
http://www.nashuaadvocate.blogspot.com/

In an article slated for release at 12:01 A.M. on Saturday, December 18th, the Associated Press will report that, with 74% of votes recounted from the November 2nd, 2004 election, 949 new net votes have been uncovered.

While it is impossible to calculate what percentage of these new votes were uncovered via manual recounts, and what percentage from machine recounts -- the AP claims, in general terms, that the new votes were engendered by "hanging chads that came loose when punch-card ballots were handled again or rerun through tallying machines" -- if these 949 votes came primarily from the 3% hand-recounts, a statewide manual recount would be expected to accumulate approximately 42,320 new net votes. While this total could be much lower (if machine-recounts, not hand-recounts, also loosened many chads) or much higher (if ballot-prepping and precinct-targeting make the 3%-of-ballots recounts conducted thus far unrepresentative of the state as a whole) in the judgment of The Advocate this estimate seems to be a well-grounded, middle-of-the-road figure.

Of course, this figure refers only to new net votes; The Advocate has already posited, in this space, that new gross votes would, of necessity, be much greater in number, perhaps -- and this estimate still seems feasible, albeit slightly more attentuated with current data -- as high as 100,000 new ballots counted.

Those wondering how two major-party candidates could "lose" votes in a tally, thereby allowing "gross" votes added overall to be much higher than "net" votes reported need simply consider that A) manual recounts can show that a vote presumed to be for a candidate was in fact an overvote (e.g., through double-punching, write-in votes, or other markings on the ballot; B) manual recounts can show that a vote presumed to be for a major-party candidate was in fact for a minor-party candidate; C) manual recounts can show that a vote tallied for one candidate was in fact an undervote, either because of machine error designating the ballot incorrectly, or because a visual inspection of the ballot suggests that the ballot does not meet Ohio's "two-corner" rule for hanging chads, or because a manual recount uncovers disparities in poll-books or polling-guides which invalidate altogether individual votes for one candidate or another; D) manual recounts can show that a ballot was illegally filed as either a provisional or absentee ballot, thus striking altogether a given vote for a candidate; and E) manual recounts can find new undervotes or count as valid existing undervotes.

In short, it cannot be presumed that every vote gained for Kerry was lost to Bush, or vice versa, and that therefore "net votes gained for each candidate equals gross votes gained for the two candidates together." Those with much greater faith in ballot-counting than our Staff may wish to reduce The Advocate's estimated statistical disparity between net and gross votes and allow, therefore, that a statewide manual recount would "only" result in 60,000 or so new gross votes -- not enough to swing the election in itself, but, when combined with other coting irregularities and an existing crop of 92,000 undervotes, perhaps still enough to do so.

ENDS

© Scoop Media

 
 
 
 
 
Top Scoops Headlines

 

Howard Davis: Lest We Forget - Scoop As A Digital Archive

Scoop performs a sadly overlooked and tragically undernourished, but nevertheless extraordinarily vital function. Over the past 17 years, it has evolved into a unique digital archive conserving millions of items of truly national significance. More>>

ALSO:

Gordon Campbell: On The Latest Allegations Against Helen Clark

According to former PM and UNDP leader current Helen Clark, the allegations leveled at her this week in a Foreign Policy magazine article by the prize-winning UN journalist Colum Lynch have been ‘totally fabricated’. Hmmm. That would be very, very surprising. More>>

Letter From The Editor: The State Of Scoop

Gordon Campbell: The PledgeMe campaign currently being run by the Scoop Foundation does provide a useful opportunity to update you on what gets done with your money. Further down the track, other documents will set out what we plan to do, resources permitting. For now, lets stick with the practical nuts and bolts. More>>

ALSO:

Gordon Campbell: On The Rise Of The Far Right (And Battle Bots)

In his victory speech at the Cannes film festival this week, the British film director Ken Loach [pictued] warned that the rise of far right parties in Europe was being fuelled by the economic policies of austerity, and manifested in a welfare bureaucracy that systematically denies assistance to those in most need. More>>

Julienne Molineaux: Stuff-Me - The Newspaper Gobble-Up

In New Zealand, concentration of newspaper ownership via mergers and acquisitions has a long pre-digital history. The trends of declining readership and fragmented audiences began before digital content, and mergers and acquisitions proceeded apace, enabled by weak legislative protections. More>>

ALSO:

Scoop Foundation Membership Drive:

The Scoop Foundation: The best chance to create an independent guardian for public interest journalism in NZ

The Scoop Foundation is seeking public support to safeguard the future of public interest journalism in New Zealand. To ensure public access to comprehensive, free, timely news is maintained during this dark hour for journalism. And to provide every voice in NZ the opportunity to be heard in the national debate. More>>
PLEDGE NOW: Journalism: A New Model - The 2016 Scoop Foundation Membership Drive

Scoop Foundation Timeline:

Get More From Scoop

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Top Scoops
Search Scoop  
 
 
Powered by Vodafone
NZ independent news