Book Reviews | Gordon Campbell | News Flashes | Scoop Features | Scoop Video | Strange & Bizarre | Search

 


Nixon US Def. Sec. Blasts Cowboy Approach To Iraq

Nixon's US Defense Secretary Blasts "Texas Cowboy" Approach To Iraq


by Richard S. Ehrlich

BANGKOK, Thailand -- America attacked Vietnam and Iraq "based on intelligence failures and possibly outright deception," according to former U.S. Defense Secretary Melvin R. Laird, who blasted President Bush's "west Texas cowboy approach."

Allegations of Americans torturing people in Guantanamo Bay, Abu Ghraib and other prisons are reminiscent of "the mistreatment of our own POWs by North Vietnam," Laird said.

Laird was President Richard M. Nixon's controversial Secretary of Defense from 1969 to 1973, helping to orchestrate some of the bloodiest campaigns of America's war in Vietnam, which also destroyed much of Cambodia and Laos.

Laird's surprising analysis appears in his 8,500-word essay, titled "Iraq: Learning the Lessons of Vietnam," published in the November-December issue of Foreign Affairs magazine.

Laird compared Bush and Nixon, Iraq and Vietnam, and examined the often-twisted reasons America unleashed mayhem here in Southeast Asia, which he said killed 3.1 million "nationalists" and "communists" in North Vietnam.

Thousands of U.S.-backed South Vietnamese, plus more than 50,000 Americans and others, also perished in the Vietnam war, before defeated Americans retreated home to a country polarized by the killing and deception.

"In this business of trust, President Bush got off to a bad start. Nixon had the same problem. Both the Vietnam war and the Iraq war were launched based on intelligence failures and possibly outright deception," Laird said.

"In Iraq, the intelligence blunder concerned Saddam's nonexistent weapons of mass destruction, which in the end may or may not have been Bush's real motivation for going to war."

Laird was satirized during his term by an anti-war song performed by New York City's irreverent Fugs which asked: "Are you a vampire, Melvin Laird?"

Mindful of society's perception, Laird said, "Bush is losing the public relations war by making the same strategic mistakes we made in Vietnam."

Laird warned, "His [Bush's] west Texas cowboy approach -- shoot first and answer questions later, or do the job first and let the results speak for themselves -- is not working."

American troops in Vietnam indiscriminately killed civilians, while agitated U.S. forces are killing Iraqi civilians, he said.

"Back then, frightened and untrained U.S. troops were ill-equipped to govern their baser instincts and fears. Countless innocent civilians were killed in the indiscriminate hunt for Vietcong among the South Vietnamese peasantry," Laird said.

"Our volunteer troops in Iraq are better trained and supervised, yet the potential remains for a slaughter of innocents. Reports have already surfaced of skittish American soldiers shooting Iraqi civilians in acts that can only be attributed to poor training and discipline."

He also criticized the current U.S. prison system which prevents trials for select victims and instead indefinitely cages and abuses them.

"For me, the alleged prison scandals reported to have occurred in Iraq, in Afghanistan, and at Guantanamo Bay have been a disturbing reminder of the mistreatment of our own POWs by North Vietnam.

"The conditions in our current prison camps are nowhere near as horrific as they were at the 'Hanoi Hilton,' but that is no reason to pat ourselves on the back," he said, referring to a POW jail run by Vietnamese communists.

"The minute we begin to deport prisoners to other nations where they can legally be tortured, when we hold people without charges or trial, when we move prisoners around to avoid the prying inspections of the Red Cross, when prisoners die inexplicably on our watch, we are on a slippery slope toward the inhumanity that we deplore."

Laird also confirmed Washington installed puppet dictators in Vietnam during the war by creating a sinister, Potemkin-style democracy.

"Elections [in Vietnam] were choreographed by the United States to empower corrupt, selfish men who were no more than dictators in the garb of statesmen."

Despite lofty U.S. rhetoric, Washington was willing to ignore demands for democracy and instead clamp Vietnamese under "any regime that advanced our Cold War agenda," he revealed.

Laird's essay was mostly supportive of the U.S. invasion and occupation of Iraq, which he claimed helps America and tackles Islamist terrorism.

He also supported the anti-communist goals of the war in Vietnam.

The Iraq war differs from Vietnam, however, because it is now partly a war for "Persian Gulf oil".

"The stakes could not be higher for the continued existence of our own democracy and, yes, for the significant matter of oil," Laird said.

"Picture those oil reserves in the hands of religious extremists whose idea of utopia is to knock the world economy and culture back more than a millennium to the dawn of Islam."

Laird personally suffered during the Vietnam war, when the president and secretary of state became paranoid and punishing.

"The president [Nixon] approved [Secretary of State Henry] Kissinger's order to the FBI to tap my military assistant's home phone, hoping to catch the two of us in a plot to leak secrets."

*************

Richard S. Ehrlich, a freelance journalist who has reported news from Asia for the past 27 years, is co-author of the non-fiction book, "HELLO MY BIG BIG HONEY!" -- Love Letters to Bangkok Bar Girls and Their Revealing Interviews. His web page is http://www.geocities.com/asia_correspondent/

© Scoop Media

 
 
 
 
 
Top Scoops Headlines

 

Binoy Kampmark: Dysfunctional Hagiography: Australia & Gough Whitlam's Death

Hagiography is the curse of the Australian Labor movement. It is a movement that searches for, and craves, mythical figures and myths. Such a phenomenon might be termed mummification, and detracts from closer examination. More>>

David Swanson: On Killing Trayvons

This Wednesday is a day of action that some are calling a national day of action against police brutality, with others adding 'and mass incarceration,' and I'd like to add 'and war' and make it global rather than national. More>>

Uri Avnery: Israel Ignoring “Tectonic Change” In Public Opinion

If the British parliament had adopted a resolution in favour of the Israeli occupation of the West Bank, the reaction of our media would have been like this: More>>

ALSO:

| UK MPs blow a “raspberry” at Netanyahu and his serfs

Byron Clark: Fiji Election: Crooks In Suits

On September 17 Fiji held its first election since Voreqe “Frank” Bainimarama seized power in a 2006 coup. With his Fiji First party receiving 59.2% of the vote, Bainimarama will remain in power. More>>

Ramzy Baroud: ‘Islamic State’ Sectarianism Is Not Coincidental

Consider this comical scene described by Peter Van Buren, a former US diplomat, who was deployed to Iraq on a 12-month assignment in 2009-10: Van Buren led two Department of State teams assigned with the abstract mission of the ‘reconstruction’ of ... More>>

Gordon Campbell: On The Case For Using Air Power Against The Islamic State

There is an Alice Through the Looking Glass quality to the current response to the Islamic State. Everything about it seems inside out. Many people who would normally oppose US air strikes in other countries have reluctantly endorsed the bombing of IS positions in Iraq and Syria – not because they think air power alone will defeat IS (clearly it won’t) but because it will slow it down, and impede its ability to function. More>>

ALSO:

Gordon Campbell: On The Troubled Aftermath Of Scotland’s Independence Vote

A week can be a very long time in Scotland’s 300 year struggle for independence. The “No” vote last week that seemed to end the cause of Scottish independence for a generation, has turned out to have had an enormous fish hook attached, especially for the British Labour Party… More>>

ALSO:

Gordon Campbell: On The West’s Existential Crisis About What To Do With Putin, And The Islamic State

Say one thing for Russian President Vladimir Putin. At least he’s given NATO a purpose in life. Right now, that consists of being something that Barack Obama and David Cameron can hide behind, point at Putin, and say : “Go get him, tiger.” Just what NATO is supposed to do about Putin’s armed advance into eastern Ukraine is less than clear. But there is a lot of “steely determination” around in high places. More>>

Get More From Scoop

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Top Scoops
Search Scoop  
 
 
Powered by Vodafone
NZ independent news