Book Reviews | Gordon Campbell | News Flashes | Scoop Features | Scoop Video | Strange & Bizarre | Search

 


Nixon US Def. Sec. Blasts Cowboy Approach To Iraq

Nixon's US Defense Secretary Blasts "Texas Cowboy" Approach To Iraq


by Richard S. Ehrlich

BANGKOK, Thailand -- America attacked Vietnam and Iraq "based on intelligence failures and possibly outright deception," according to former U.S. Defense Secretary Melvin R. Laird, who blasted President Bush's "west Texas cowboy approach."

Allegations of Americans torturing people in Guantanamo Bay, Abu Ghraib and other prisons are reminiscent of "the mistreatment of our own POWs by North Vietnam," Laird said.

Laird was President Richard M. Nixon's controversial Secretary of Defense from 1969 to 1973, helping to orchestrate some of the bloodiest campaigns of America's war in Vietnam, which also destroyed much of Cambodia and Laos.

Laird's surprising analysis appears in his 8,500-word essay, titled "Iraq: Learning the Lessons of Vietnam," published in the November-December issue of Foreign Affairs magazine.

Laird compared Bush and Nixon, Iraq and Vietnam, and examined the often-twisted reasons America unleashed mayhem here in Southeast Asia, which he said killed 3.1 million "nationalists" and "communists" in North Vietnam.

Thousands of U.S.-backed South Vietnamese, plus more than 50,000 Americans and others, also perished in the Vietnam war, before defeated Americans retreated home to a country polarized by the killing and deception.

"In this business of trust, President Bush got off to a bad start. Nixon had the same problem. Both the Vietnam war and the Iraq war were launched based on intelligence failures and possibly outright deception," Laird said.

"In Iraq, the intelligence blunder concerned Saddam's nonexistent weapons of mass destruction, which in the end may or may not have been Bush's real motivation for going to war."

Laird was satirized during his term by an anti-war song performed by New York City's irreverent Fugs which asked: "Are you a vampire, Melvin Laird?"

Mindful of society's perception, Laird said, "Bush is losing the public relations war by making the same strategic mistakes we made in Vietnam."

Laird warned, "His [Bush's] west Texas cowboy approach -- shoot first and answer questions later, or do the job first and let the results speak for themselves -- is not working."

American troops in Vietnam indiscriminately killed civilians, while agitated U.S. forces are killing Iraqi civilians, he said.

"Back then, frightened and untrained U.S. troops were ill-equipped to govern their baser instincts and fears. Countless innocent civilians were killed in the indiscriminate hunt for Vietcong among the South Vietnamese peasantry," Laird said.

"Our volunteer troops in Iraq are better trained and supervised, yet the potential remains for a slaughter of innocents. Reports have already surfaced of skittish American soldiers shooting Iraqi civilians in acts that can only be attributed to poor training and discipline."

He also criticized the current U.S. prison system which prevents trials for select victims and instead indefinitely cages and abuses them.

"For me, the alleged prison scandals reported to have occurred in Iraq, in Afghanistan, and at Guantanamo Bay have been a disturbing reminder of the mistreatment of our own POWs by North Vietnam.

"The conditions in our current prison camps are nowhere near as horrific as they were at the 'Hanoi Hilton,' but that is no reason to pat ourselves on the back," he said, referring to a POW jail run by Vietnamese communists.

"The minute we begin to deport prisoners to other nations where they can legally be tortured, when we hold people without charges or trial, when we move prisoners around to avoid the prying inspections of the Red Cross, when prisoners die inexplicably on our watch, we are on a slippery slope toward the inhumanity that we deplore."

Laird also confirmed Washington installed puppet dictators in Vietnam during the war by creating a sinister, Potemkin-style democracy.

"Elections [in Vietnam] were choreographed by the United States to empower corrupt, selfish men who were no more than dictators in the garb of statesmen."

Despite lofty U.S. rhetoric, Washington was willing to ignore demands for democracy and instead clamp Vietnamese under "any regime that advanced our Cold War agenda," he revealed.

Laird's essay was mostly supportive of the U.S. invasion and occupation of Iraq, which he claimed helps America and tackles Islamist terrorism.

He also supported the anti-communist goals of the war in Vietnam.

The Iraq war differs from Vietnam, however, because it is now partly a war for "Persian Gulf oil".

"The stakes could not be higher for the continued existence of our own democracy and, yes, for the significant matter of oil," Laird said.

"Picture those oil reserves in the hands of religious extremists whose idea of utopia is to knock the world economy and culture back more than a millennium to the dawn of Islam."

Laird personally suffered during the Vietnam war, when the president and secretary of state became paranoid and punishing.

"The president [Nixon] approved [Secretary of State Henry] Kissinger's order to the FBI to tap my military assistant's home phone, hoping to catch the two of us in a plot to leak secrets."

*************

Richard S. Ehrlich, a freelance journalist who has reported news from Asia for the past 27 years, is co-author of the non-fiction book, "HELLO MY BIG BIG HONEY!" -- Love Letters to Bangkok Bar Girls and Their Revealing Interviews. His web page is http://www.geocities.com/asia_correspondent/

© Scoop Media

 
 
 
 
 
Top Scoops Headlines

 

Open Source / Open Society: The Scoop Foundation - An Open Model For NZ Media

Access to accurate, relevant and timely information is a crucial aspect of an open and transparent society. However, in our digital society information is in a state of flux with every aspect of its creation, delivery and consumption undergoing profound redefinition... More>>

Keeping Out The Vote: Gordon Campbell On The US Elections

I’ll focus here on just two ways that dis-enfranchisement is currently occurring in the US: (a) by the rigging of the boundary lines for voter districts and (b) by demanding elaborate photo IDs before people are allowed to cast their vote. More>>

Ramzy Baroud: Being Black Palestinian - Solidarity As A Welcome Pathology

It should come as no surprise that the loudest international solidarity that accompanied the continued spate of the killing of Black Americans comes from Palestine; that books have already been written and published by Palestinians about the plight of their Black brethren. In fact, that solidarity is mutual. More>>

ALSO:

Max Rashbrooke: Why The New British Conservative PM Is Talking Inequality

In a major speech, May honed in on one key theme: an economy “that works for everyone”. It was strikingly like the language that the former British Labour leader, Ed Miliband, used in last year’s election campaign, as he put inequality front and centre of his – unsuccessful – political pitch. More>>

ALSO:

Gordon Campbell: On Tony Blair And The Chilcot Report

Alongside this litany of criticisms of Blair’s style of government and decision-making, Chilcot has also given Blair a remarkable amount of wiggle room. More>>

ALSO:

Werewolf: Flying Blind

Lets imagine an industry that prides itself on its modern technology. Yet its basic service is a chronic source of anxiety to many of its customers, partly because (very occasionally) this industry suffers catastrophic accidents that kill everyone who is using a particular instance of its service at the time. More>>

Get More From Scoop

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Top Scoops
Search Scoop  
 
 
Powered by Vodafone
NZ independent news