Top Scoops

Book Reviews | Gordon Campbell | Scoop News | Wellington Scoop | Community Scoop | Search

 

RNC Line on Impeachment: Verily, This Is That

RNC Line on Impeachment: Verily, This Is That


By David Swanson

Black is white. War is peace. Impeachment is good for Republicans. Haven't you heard? The Republicans say so. The Democrats say so. It just must BE so.

And yet there isn't a shred of evidence to support it. Usually when we hear that a minimum wage is bad for low-income workers or tax cuts for billionaires benefit the poor, or any such apparently upside-down fantasy, we are at least given semi-plausible theories for how those lies could be truths.

In this case, all we've been offered is the idea that a threat of impeachment will cause Republicans to vote in defense of a party they otherwise wouldn't bother voting for. But I've not seen a single poll to suggest that's true, much less that it could be true to an extent that would outweigh the benefits to Democrats of promoting impeachment.

Don't get me wrong. I consider it inexcusable on the part of either party to be placing electoral concerns ahead of protecting our democracy from a President who routinely violates the law. But the evidence overwhelmingly suggests that making the coming congressional elections a referendum on impeachment of Bush and Cheney would result in landslides for Democrats and Independents.

In the latest Harris poll, 90 percent of Democrats and 81 percent of Independents disapproved of Bush, numbers that continue to rise. Meanwhile 67 percent of Republicans, and falling, approved of him. In fact, some Republican candidates are avoiding appearing in public with Bush or Cheney, even at their own fundraisers. Here's a graphic display of results from Harris and every other major poll on approval of the President from January 2001 through the present:


Click for big version

A recent poll by Zogby International asked people what would restore their trust in government. Their number one response was "Personnel changes / impeachment proceedings."
http://zogby.com/news/ReadNews.dbm?ID=1116

A Zogby poll conducted in January (that is, three or four scandals ago) in Pennsylvania (the only place this has been done) asked whether voters would prefer pro-impeachment candidates. Among Democrats 84.9% said yes. Among Independents, 49.3% said yes, versus 40.6% who said no. Among Republicans, 90.4% said no. Overall, impeachment support has a majority. And it's a passionate majority: almost all of the Democrats and Independents who supported pro-impeachment candidates said they were not just "likely" but "very likely" to prefer such candidates.
http://www.afterdowningstreet.org/?q=node/7237

Numerous national polls have found strong support for impeachment. Polls by Ipsos, Zogby, and American Research Group have found support between 43% and 53% overall. Of course, support is always much higher among Democrats and Independents than among Republicans.
http://www.afterdowningstreet.org/polling

Support for impeachment and removal from office is lower (33% according to the Washington Post), though that's significantly higher than it ever was for Clinton.

But for impeachment to have anything close to majority support despite opposition by both political parties and almost no positive coverage in the media is remarkable. Among Democrats, impeachment tends to have 80 to 90 percent support. Among Independents, it tends to be supported by a majority. And all of these numbers are trending upward, with six months remaining before the elections.

An off-year election is usually won by turnout. If more Democrats are inspired to turn out and to work to turn their neighbors out, it doesn't matter what Independents or Republicans think. If Independents who support a Democrat turn out in higher numbers as well, it really doesn't matter what Republicans think. The polls on support for the President and support for impeachment suggest that if the elections are about Bush and Cheney and impeachment, Republicans will lose.

Anecdotal evidence that can help us gauge the degree of passion behind people's support for impeachment suggests the same. An unfunded, un authorized, grassroots movement has begun passing pro-impeachment resolutions at Democratic Party conventions, and in town and city governments, as well as forcing the introduction of such resolutions in state legislatures. Events and organizations focused on the war and other issues have been compelled to promote impeachment. And I have never seen any other word capable of generating standing ovations in rooms around the country the way "impeachment" does today.

Very little will inspire voters to turn out and vote against a Republican as well as advocacy for impeachment. Any candidate who backs impeachment is unlikely to lose a lot of votes to a third-party candidate from the left. A political action committee aimed at backing pro-impeachment candidates has been flooded with money: www.impeachpac.org , and pro-impeachment candidates are running ads together to boost their campaigns, including primary campaigns that are threatening Vichy-Democrat incumbents: www.impeachteam.com .

Events promoting impeachment will be organized by numerous groups all over the country this summer and fall. The issue will not go away. But the only way Republicans will be able to capitalize on it will be if Democrats run from it, if they join the Republicans in telling people, based on no evidence, that impeachment is a reason to fear Democrats.

When something is said over and over and over again, even if it's "Up is down," people will tend to believe it. If it's denounced as nonsense, however, and truth is spoken plainly and fearlessly, the power of that can be overwhelming. Can you imagine the pressure Republicans in moderate districts would feel if every Democrats in Congress now backed impeachment? Forget the elections. We'd get to impeachment before November.

Democrats in Congress are not promoting impeachment, secretly or otherwise, but a minority of them (37 Members) are promoting a call for an investigation of possible crimes.
http://www.afterdowningstreet.org/635

While I have yet to hear any Congress Member of either party oppose H Res 635 on the grounds that an investigation wouldn't find anything, I've heard many Democratic Congress Members oppose it because (as Leader Pelosi has instructed them to say) impeachment is good for Republicans.

OK. But wait a minute. Even if that were true, H Res 635 will only lead to impeachment if Bush and Cheney are guilty of impeachable offenses. And if you believe they are, then you have a sworn duty to impeach them. If you set that aside in an attempt to win an election, you'll look like the one thing voters like less than cruel corporate thieves and warmongers: spineless cowards.

ENDS

© Scoop Media

 
 
 
Top Scoops Headlines

 

27-29 Sept: Social Enterprise World Forum Live Blog

1600+ delegates from more than 45 countries have came together to share wisdom, build networks and discuss how to create a more sustainable future using social enterprise as a vehicle. Attending the Forum were social enterprise practitioners, social entrepreneurs, policy makers, community leaders, investors, activists, academics and more from across the globe... More>>

HiveMind Report: A Universal Basic Income For Aotearoa NZ

Results from this HiveMind suggests that an overwhelming majority of Kiwis believe that due to changing circumstances and inefficiencies in the current system, we need a better system to take care of welfare of struggling members in our society. More>>

ALSO:

Scoop Hivemind: Medical Cannabis - Co-Creating A Policy For Aotearoa

Welcome to the fourth and final HiveMind for Scoop’s Opening the Election campaign for 2017. This HiveMind explores the question: what would a fair, humane and safe Medical Cannabis policy look like for Aotearoa, NZ in 2018? More>>

ALSO:

Lyndon Hood: Notes On National’s Election Campaign, In Poem Form

Nationyl’s bitumen-ing / As they du du / Seed groweth / River floweth / Then ‘dozer drives thru / Highway ensu. More>>