Book Reviews | Gordon Campbell | News Flashes | Scoop Features | Scoop Video | Strange & Bizarre | Search


Sarup: What Will Happen If Maoist Gain Power?

What Will Happen If Maoist Gain Power?

By Kamala Sarup

If the maoists gain complete power in Nepal, the subsequent history of this beautiful but tragic country is likely to follow the history of many other countries that adopted communism (aka socialism, maoism) for a while, only to reject it later, after its failure becomes obvious.

The governments of many countries have adopted maoism, communism or socialism for at least the most important economic sectors: USSR, CPR, eastern Europe under USSR, United Kingdom, Egypt, India, Syria, Chile and Cuba, for prominent examples. All have failed. Only Cuba remains socialistic today and that is only because its revolutionary leader, Fidel Castro, has maintained a tight security grip on the country.

That it is a failure is amply illustrated by the large numbers of Cubans who continuously risk life and limb to reach the U.S.A., 90 miles away, via flimsy ocean craft.

Desperate people welcome new ideologies, so it is not surprising that the people of Nepal would welcome the maoists to power. Intially, they would fare well with land redistribution and job creation for all who apply. No starvation would exist and everyone who wants to work is able to do so. However, there the dream ends.

To become developed economically, Nepal must be able to import goods and services available in developed countries, for it cannot make most of them itself. To trade, one must have something worthwhile to sell to the peoples of other countries. Tourism is insufficient. Therefore, the maoists would have to build an infrastructure of education, electrical power, communications, water supply and transportation. These take time and money. Where to obtain the money? From the capitalists of the developed countries. Would the capitalists supply it? Not likely in a country governed by leaders committed to an ideology of communal control of businesses.

Therefore, after some initial successes, the people of Nepal would continue to be poor. Another problem with maoism is its lack of incentive.

It has been shown time and time again in formerly maoists countries, that people will not work hard when the product of their efforts are mainly to benefit others rather than themselves. They are selfish this way. However, maoism or communism requires the intellectual and manual efforts of people that benefit the community, not the innovator.

Capitalism is featured by selfish incentives to creative and hard working people. It is a system where selfishness benefits both the producer and the consumer, since the latter is the final arbiter of what is sold, for "the consumer is king". Since a maoists or socialist economy lacks adequate incentives, its workers will not produce well in comparison with the capitalist economies. Furthermore, in its endeavor to have jobs for everyone, labor costs will escalate, thus making prices uncompetitive in world markets. Therefore, the Nepalese economy will not be competitive, and it will be unable to import goods and services in sufficient quantities.

The result would be that its people will continue to be poor. Eventually, the general population would become so dissatified that a group of counterrevolutionaries would win their support and oust the maoists. The people would be no better off than before, except for maoist party functionaries who would line their own pockets before fleeing to a safer haven.

Equality and incentive are mutually incompatible. When will revolutionaries learn that maoism in its various forms will never succeed?


© Scoop Media

Top Scoops Headlines


Werewolf: Living With Rio’s Olympic Ruins

Mariana Cavalcanti Critics of the Olympic project can point a discernible pattern in the delivery of Olympics-related urban interventions: the belated but rushed inaugurations of faulty and/or unfinished infrastructures... More>>

Live Blog On Now: Open Source//Open Society Conference

The second annual Open Source Open Society Conference is a 2 day event taking place on 22-23 August 2016 at Michael Fowler Centre in Wellington… Scoop is hosting a live blog summarising the key points of this exciting conference. More>>



Gordon Campbell: On The Politicising Of The War On Drugs In Sport

It hasn’t been much fun at all to see how “war on drugs in sport” has become a proxy version of the Cold War, fixated on Russia. This weekend’s banning of the Russian long jumper Darya Klishina took that fixation to fresh extremes. More>>


Binoy Kampmark: Kevin Rudd’s Failed UN Secretary General Bid

Few sights are sadder in international diplomacy than seeing an aging figure desperate for honours. In a desperate effort to net them, he scurries around, cultivating, prodding, wishing to be noted. Finally, such an honour is netted, in all likelihood just to shut that overly keen individual up. More>>

Open Source / Open Society: The Scoop Foundation - An Open Model For NZ Media

Access to accurate, relevant and timely information is a crucial aspect of an open and transparent society. However, in our digital society information is in a state of flux with every aspect of its creation, delivery and consumption undergoing profound redefinition... More>>

Keeping Out The Vote: Gordon Campbell On The US Elections

I’ll focus here on just two ways that dis-enfranchisement is currently occurring in the US: (a) by the rigging of the boundary lines for voter districts and (b) by demanding elaborate photo IDs before people are allowed to cast their vote. More>>

Ramzy Baroud: Being Black Palestinian - Solidarity As A Welcome Pathology

It should come as no surprise that the loudest international solidarity that accompanied the continued spate of the killing of Black Americans comes from Palestine; that books have already been written and published by Palestinians about the plight of their Black brethren. In fact, that solidarity is mutual. More>>


Get More From Scoop

Top Scoops
Search Scoop  
Powered by Vodafone
NZ independent news