Reclaiming Issues: Islamic Or Republican Fascism?
Reclaiming The Issues: Islamic Or Republican Fascism?
by Thom Hartmann
In the years since George W. Bush first used 9/11 as his own "Reichstag fire" to gut the Constitution and enhance the power and wealth of his corporate cronies, many across the political spectrum have accused him and his Republican support group of being fascists.
On the right,The John Birch Society's website editor recently opined of the Bush Administration's warrantless wiretap program: "This is to say that from the administration's perspective, the president is, in effect, our living constitution. This is, in a specific and unmistakable sense, fascist."
On the left, Robert F. Kennedy, Jr. specifically indicts the Bush administration for fascistic behavior in his book "Crimes Against Nature: How George W. Bush and his Corporate Pals Are Plundering the Country and Hijacking Our Democracy."
Genuine American fascists are on the run, and part of their survival strategy is to redefine the term "fascism" so it can't be applied to them any more. Most recently, George W. Bush said: "This nation is at war with Islamic fascists who will use any means to destroy those of us who love freedom, to hurt our nation."
In fact, the Islamic fundamentalists who apparently perpetrated 9/11 and other crimes in Spain and the United Kingdom are advocating a fundamentalist theocracy, not fascism.
But theocracy - the merging of religion and government - is also on the plate for the new American fascists (just as it was for Hitler, who based the Nazi death cult on a "new Christianity" that would bring "a thousand years of peace"), so they don't want to use that term, either.
While the Republicans promote the term "Islamo-fascism," the rest of the world is pushing back, as the BBC noted in an article by Richard Allen Greene ("Bush's Language Angers US Muslims" - 12 August 2006):
"'There is no sense in which jihadists
embrace fascist ideology as it was developed by Mussolini or
anyone else who was associated with the term,' he said.
'This is an epithet, a way of arousing strong emotion and
tarnishing one's opponent, but it doesn't tell us anything
about the content of their
"Security expert Daniel
Benjamin of the Center for Strategic and International
Studies agreed that the term [Islamic fascists] was
"'There is no sense in which jihadists embrace fascist ideology as it was developed by Mussolini or anyone else who was associated with the term,' he said. 'This is an epithet, a way of arousing strong emotion and tarnishing one's opponent, but it doesn't tell us anything about the content of their beliefs.'"
Their beliefs are, quite simply, that governments of the world should be subservient to religion, a view shared by a small but significant part of today's Republican party. But that is not fascism - the fascists in the US want to exploit the fundamentalist theocrats to achieve their own fascistic goals.
Vice President of the United States Henry Wallace was the first to clearly and accurately point out who the real American fascists are, and what they're up to.
In early 1944 the New York Times asked Vice President Wallace to, as Wallace noted, "write a piece answering the following questions: What is a fascist? How many fascists have we? How dangerous are they?"
Vice President Wallace's answers to those questions were published in The New York Times on April 9, 1944, at the height of the war against the Axis powers of Germany and Japan:
dangerous American fascists," Wallace wrote, "are not those
who are hooked up directly or indirectly with the Axis. The
FBI has its finger on those. The dangerous American fascist
is the man who wants to do in the United States in an
American way what Hitler did in Germany in a Prussian way.
The American fascist would prefer not to use violence. His
method is to poison the channels of public information. With
a fascist the problem is never how best to present the truth
to the public but how best to use the news to deceive the
public into giving the fascist and his group more money or
In this, Vice President Wallace was using the classic definition of the word "fascist" - the definition Mussolini had in mind when he claimed to have invented the word. (It was actually Italian philosopher Giovanni Gentile who wrote the entry in the Encyclopedia Italiana that said: "Fascism should more appropriately be called corporatism because it is a merger of state and corporate power." Mussolini, however, affixed his name to the entry, and claimed credit for it.)
As the 1983 American Heritage Dictionary noted, fascism is: "A system of government that exercises a dictatorship of the extreme right, typically through the merging of state and business leadership, together with belligerent nationalism." (The US dictionary definition has gotten somewhat squishier since then, as all the larger dictionary companies have been bought up by multinational corporations.)
Mussolini was quite straightforward about all this. In a 1923 pamphlet titled "The Doctrine of Fascism" he wrote, "If classical liberalism spells individualism, Fascism spells government." But not a government of, by, and for We The People - instead, it would be a government of, by, and for the most powerful corporate interests in the nation.
In 1938, Mussolini brought his vision of fascism into full reality when he dissolved Parliament and replaced it with the "Camera dei Fasci e delle Corporazioni" - the Chamber of the Fascist Corporations. Corporations were still privately owned, but now instead of having to sneak their money to folks like John Boehner and covertly write legislation, they were openly in charge of the government.
Vice President Wallace bluntly laid out his concern about the same happening here in America in his 1944 Times article:
" If we define an American fascist as
one who in case of conflict puts money and power ahead of
human beings, then there are undoubtedly several million
fascists in the United States. There are probably several
hundred thousand if we narrow the definition to include only
those who in their search for money and power are ruthless
and deceitful. ... They are patriotic in time of war because
it is to their interest to be so, but in time of peace they
follow power and the dollar wherever they may
Nonetheless, at that time there were few corporate heads who had run for political office, and, in Wallace's view, most politicians still felt it was their obligation to represent We The People instead of corporate cartels. The real problem would come, he believed, when the media was concentrated in only a few hands:
"American fascism will not be
really dangerous," he added in the next paragraph, "until
there is a purposeful coalition among the cartelists, the
deliberate poisoners of public
Noting that, "Fascism is a worldwide disease," Wallace further suggested that fascism's "greatest threat to the United States will come after the war" and will manifest "within the United States itself."
In Sinclair Lewis's 1935 novel "It Can't Happen Here," a conservative southern politician is helped to the presidency by a nationally syndicated "conservative" radio talk show host. The politician - Buzz Windrip - runs his campaign on family values, the flag, and patriotism. Windrip and the talk show host portray advocates of traditional American democracy as anti-American. When Windrip becomes President, he opens a Guantanamo-style detention center, and the viewpoint character of the book, Vermont newspaper editor Doremus Jessup, flees to Canada to avoid prosecution under new "patriotic" laws that make it illegal to criticize the President. As Lewis noted in his novel:
"The President, with something
of his former good-humor [said]: 'There are two [political]
parties, the Corporate and those who don't belong to any
party at all, and so, to use a common phrase, are just out
of luck!' The idea of the Corporate or Corporative State,
Secretary [of State] Sarason had more or less taken from
Italy." And, President "Windrip's partisans called
themselves the Corporatists, or, familiarly, the 'Corpos,'
which nickname was generally
Lewis, the first American writer to win a Nobel Prize, was world famous by 1944, as was his book "It Can't Happen Here." And several well-known and powerful Americans, including Prescott Bush, had lost businesses in the early 1940s because of charges by Roosevelt that they were doing business with Hitler. These events all, no doubt, colored Vice President Wallace's thinking when he wrote in The New York Times:
"Still another danger is represented by those who, paying lip service to democracy and the common welfare, in their insatiable greed for money and the power which money gives, do not hesitate surreptitiously to evade the laws designed to safeguard the public from monopolistic extortion. American fascists of this stamp were clandestinely aligned with their German counterparts before the war, and are even now preparing to resume where they left off, after 'the present unpleasantness' ceases."
Thus, the rich get richer (and more powerful) on the backs of the poor and the middle class, giant corporate behemoths wipe out small and middle sized businesses, and a corporate iron fist is seizing control of our government itself. As I detail in my new book "Screwed: The Undeclared War Against The Middle Class," the primary beneficiaries of this new fascism are the corporatists, while the once-outspoken middle class of the 1950s-1980s is systematically being replaced by a silent serf-class of the working poor.
As Wallace wrote, some in big
business "are willing to jeopardize the structure of
American liberty to gain some temporary advantage." He
added, "Monopolists who fear competition and who distrust
democracy because it stands for equal opportunity would like
to secure their position against small and energetic
enterprise [companies]. In an effort to eliminate the
possibility of any rival growing up, some monopolists would
sacrifice democracy itself."
But American fascists who would want former CEOs as President, Vice President, House Majority Whip, and Senate Majority Leader, and write legislation with corporate interests in mind, don't generally talk to We The People about their real agenda, or the harm it does to small businesses and working people. Instead, as Hitler did with the trade union leaders and the Jews, they point to a "them" to pin with blame and distract people from the harms of their economic policies.
In a comment prescient of George W. Bush's recent suggestion that civilization itself is at risk because of gays or Muslims, Wallace continued:
The symptoms of fascist thinking are colored by environment
and adapted to immediate circumstances. But always and
everywhere they can be identified by their appeal to
prejudice and by the desire to play upon the fears and
vanities of different groups in order to gain power. It is
no coincidence that the growth of modern tyrants has in
every case been heralded by the growth of prejudice. It may
be shocking to some people in this country to realize that,
without meaning to do so, they hold views in common with
Hitler when they preach
But even at this, Wallace noted, American fascists would have to lie to the people in order to gain power. And, because they were in bed with the nation's largest corporations - who could gain control of newspapers and broadcast media - they could promote their lies with ease.
American fascists are most easily recognized by their
deliberate perversion of truth and fact," Wallace wrote.
"Their newspapers and propaganda carefully cultivate every
fissure of disunity, every crack in the common front against
fascism. They use every opportunity to impugn
In his strongest indictment of the tide of fascism the Vice President of the United States saw rising in America, he added:
Wallace said, "The myth of fascist efficiency has deluded
many people. ... Democracy, to crush fascism internally,
must...develop the ability to keep people fully employed and
at the same time balance the budget. It must put human
beings first and dollars second. It must appeal to reason
and decency and not to violence and deceit. We must not
tolerate oppressive government or industrial oligarchy in
the form of monopolies and
"They claim to be super-patriots, but
they would destroy every liberty guaranteed by the
Constitution. They demand free enterprise, but are the
spokesmen for monopoly and vested interest. Their final
objective toward which all their deceit is directed is to
capture political power so that, using the power of the
state and the power of the market simultaneously, they may
keep the common man in eternal subjection."
Finally, Wallace said, "The myth of fascist efficiency has deluded many people. ... Democracy, to crush fascism internally, must...develop the ability to keep people fully employed and at the same time balance the budget. It must put human beings first and dollars second. It must appeal to reason and decency and not to violence and deceit. We must not tolerate oppressive government or industrial oligarchy in the form of monopolies and cartels."
This liberal vision of an egalitarian America in which very large businesses and media monopolies are broken up under the 1890 Sherman Anti-Trust Act (which Reagan stopped enforcing, leading to the mergers & acquisitions frenzy that continues to this day) was the driving vision of the New Deal (and of "Trust Buster" Teddy Roosevelt a generation earlier).
As Wallace's President, Franklin D. Roosevelt, said when he accepted his party's renomination in 1936 in Philadelphia:
"...Out of this modern civilization,
economic royalists [have] carved new dynasties.... It was
natural and perhaps human that the privileged princes of
these new economic dynasties, thirsting for power, reached
out for control over government itself. They created a new
despotism and wrapped it in the robes of legal sanction....
And as a result the average man once more confronts the
problem that faced the Minute
Speaking indirectly of the fascists that Wallace would directly name almost a decade later, Roosevelt brought the issue to its core:
"These economic royalists complain
that we seek to overthrow the institutions of America. What
they really complain of is that we seek to take away their
But, he thundered in that speech:
"Our allegiance to American
institutions requires the overthrow of this kind of
In 2006, we again stand at the same crossroad Roosevelt and Wallace confronted during the Great Depression and World War II. Fascism is again rising in America, this time calling itself "compassionate conservatism," and "the free market" in a "flat" world. The RNC's behavior today eerily parallels the day in 1936 when Roosevelt said:
"In vain they seek to
hide behind the flag and the Constitution. In their
blindness they forget what the flag and the Constitution
President Roosevelt and Vice President Wallace's warnings have come full circle. Thus it's now critical that we reclaim the word "fascist" to describe current-day Republican policies, support progressive websites that spread the good word, and join together this November at the ballot box to stop fascist election fraud and this most recent incarnation of Republican-fascism from seizing complete and irretrievable control of our nation.
Permission is granted for reprint in print, email, blog, or web media so long as this credit is unchanged.
Thom Hartmann is a Project Censored Award-winning best-selling author, and host of a nationally syndicated daily progressive talk show carried on the Air America Radio network and Sirius. www.thomhartmann.com His most recent book, just released, is "Screwed: The Undeclared War on the Middle Class and What We Can Do About It." Other books include: "The Last Hours of Ancient Sunlight," "Unequal Protection," "We The People," and "What Would Jefferson Do?"