Book Reviews | Gordon Campbell | News Flashes | Scoop Features | Scoop Video | Strange & Bizarre | Search

 


M. Collins: Iraqi People to White House - Leave!

Iraqi People to White House - Leave!


Michael Collins
“Scoop” Independent News
Washington, D.C.

You may have missed this. I did.


Most Iraqis Favor Immediate U.S. Pullout, Polls Show
Leaders' Views Out of Step With Public
By Amit R. Paley
Washington Post Staff Writer
Wednesday, September 27, 2006; A22

BAGHDAD, Sept. 26 -- A strong majority of Iraqis want U.S.-led military forces to immediately withdraw from the country, saying their swift departure would make Iraq more secure and decrease sectarian violence, according to new polls by the State Department and independent researchers.

The White House maintained only one consistent goal throughout the invasion and occupation of Iraq: safety and democracy for the Iraqi people. That implies that we care what the Iraqi people think. Heard much about what the Iraqi people think lately? Ever?

I didn’t until I looked. The information wasn’t difficult to find and the sources on Iraqi public opinion are credible. USA Today did a 3,400 plus Iraqi poll in 2005, World Public Opinion.Org of the University of Maryland conducted a 1,150 poll in 2006, and the U.S. State Department ran its own poll of the Iraqi people in late 2006 as well. There are others.

As citizens of the United States, we are concerned about the safety of our troops, the impact of this war on the Iraqi people, and the overall cost of this lengthy and complex foreign adventure. We know that over 3,200 U.S. soldiers have died and many times that number have serious injuries. More of us need to know that between 450 and 650 thousand Iraqi civilians have died since the first moments of the invasion.

But what of the one consistent rationale for the invasion; the grandiose cause of bringing democracy to the Middle East and improving the lives of the Iraqi people?

If the benefits of the invasion are substantial and openly appreciated, we should find that our troops and personnel are welcomed by the people. If we are not welcome, then it’s obvious that Iraqi’s see our presence causing more harm than benefit. Who would argue with that? Isn’t respecting the popular will what democracy is all about?

A Majority of Iraqis Support Violent Attacks on U.S. Forces

These figures answer any and all questions about an ongoing occupation quickly and decisively. Why isn’t this central to the debate and decision making on our presence in Iraq? Since a majority favors attacks on our soldiers, we must assume that a rapid U.S. exit tops the Iraqi public opinion charts.


USA Today 5/05 - WPO.Org 1/06 - WPO.Org 9/06

This is outrageous. How can we ask our soldiers to serve extended duty in a nation where a majority of the people endorses to attacking them? Why isn’t this headline news daily? Why isn’t action on this clearly stated opinion at the center of the current debate on our future in Iraq? What on earth is any politician or governmental official thinking who supports staying in Iraq when a majority of Iraqis endorse attacks on U.S. forces?

Widespread exposure and analysis of this clearly stated opinion by the Iraqi people would change U.S. public opinion rapidly and permanently. Where are our leaders?

A Majority of Iraqis Want the United States Out Without Delay

The open support of deadly force against our troops is as much information as we need to reach a rational decision on leaving. It’s more than enough information to discard the absurd argument for an extended timetable prior to departure. But for the sake of the quibblers, who use any argument to prolong this tragic conflict, let’s see what the Iraqi’s think.


May 05 and 1st Sep 06 poll – immediate exit of US forces;
2nd Sep 06 poll – leave in less than 1 year.
USA Today 5/05US State Dept 9/06 - WPO.Org 9/06

In mid 2005 just over 50% of the Iraqi people wanted us out immediately. By September 2006, 65% wanted us out immediately according to a non published U.S. Department of State public opinion poll. Also in September 2006, the World Polling Organization released their findings showing 71% of Iraqis want us out in less than a year. The 71% figure was divided into segments: 37% preferring an exit in less than six months and 34% between six months and a year.

Withheld from the U.S. public, the Washington Post gained access to the U.S. State Department poll and published the most salient result, out now. The Post headline above is a double entendre of sorts: Leaders' Views Out of Step With Public. While this refers to Iraqi leaders, it is just as accurate a description of our leaders.

Our domestic debate on a timetable is framed by the irony of popular Iraqi opinion on the subject. By over a two to one margin, 53% to 23%, the Iraqi people see a specific timetable for a U.S. departure as benefiting the Iraqi government. Given that, on what basis can U.S. politicians argue that an extended timetable is necessary to protect Iraqis? They see a timetable as beneficial to their government.

Iraqi Objections to the Occupation

A positive attitude by Iraqi’s towards the U.S. presence was required whether the White House simply wanted oil or truly believed in a broader policy of liberating the Iraqi people, In fact, the war boosters predicted a jubilant welcome by the newly freed citizens. By a four to one margin, Iraqis view U.S. personnel as occupiers rather than liberators. A high percentage of Iraqis see the failure to provide adequate electricity and clean water as deliberate indifference on the part of the U.S. authorities. Few feel it’s safe to even talk to Coalition forces. This is just a part of the hostility to our presence by Iraq’s population.

A Question for U.S. Leaders and Politicians: What is your major malfunction?

Answer: You are indifferent to the opinion of the people whose nation you caused to be invaded and you now cause to be occupied. The results are a disaster. Convince us otherwise.

A majority of the people in Iraq:

  • Endorse the use of violence against U.S. troops;

  • Want us to leave very soon; and

  • See the United States as indifferent to their suffering.

The White House is supposedly quite skilled at reading and using poll data. Members of Congress use poll data on a regular basis. Why can’t they do what nearly anyone can do; search for polls on Iraqi popular opinion and use that data to make rational choices?

Clearly, our leaders don’t care what Iraqi people think. What an odd approach. If you’re going to invade and conquer a nation, call it a liberation, and claim that it’s for the good of the people, you should at least be conversant with their opinions. Operating without this information is negligence; operating with it and continuing to talk about an exit timetable is cynical beyond words.

Leaving U.S. soldiers in the middle of a nation with such a violent response to our presence is a betrayal of the trust those soldiers have in their civilian leadership. The troops don’t get to pick their wars. They do what they pledged: faithfully execute the orders of their superiors under the assumption that military action is rational and necessary. This war was not rationally justified or planned and it was not and is not necessary.

Putting the U.S. public in a position where it continues to spend hundreds of billions of dollars on an unnecessary and failed war is also a betrayal.

The betrayal of the Iraqi people is ongoing. They despised the oppression of Saddam and they certainly can’t stand what many of them see as deliberate chaos created by the White House orchestrated occupation

We’ve been invited to leave. Prompt acceptance of this invitation addresses two needs. First, it’s our opportunity to leave soon, save lives, prevent more injuries, and stop the losses in a lost cause. Second, this may be the first step toward a rational relationship between the United States and Iraq in the future. The only requirement is that the leaders of both nations respect the prevailing will of their people – end this war and end it now. It’s called democracy.

END

Permission to reproduce in whole or in part given attribution of authorship and a link to this article in “Scoop” Independent News.

© Scoop Media

 
 
 
 
 
Top Scoops Headlines

 

Suzan Mazur: Stuart Newman: The Virosphere And Non-Linear Evolution

It was Stuart Newman who was the first of the Altenberg 16 scientists I discussed developments with following the Extended Synthesis symposium in 2008 at Konrad Lorenz Institute, a meeting I was barred from attending for having gotten out in front of ... More>>

Werewolf: Artificial Intelligence: Real Anxieties?

The movie Ex Machina feels so current there are powerful moments of recognition – despite the seemingly unlikely scenario of a walking, talking artificial intelligence (AI). Right now Google is enlisting its massive databases, drawing on the contents of every email and Internet search ever made, in the service of what has been called ‘the Manhattan Project of AI’. More>>

ALSO:

Open Source, Open Society: More Than Just Transparency

Bill Bennett: “Share and share alike” is the message parents drum into children. But once they grow up and move out into the wider world, the shutters start to come down. We’re trained to be closed. Dave Lane, president of the New Zealand Open Source Society, says that explains the discomfort people find when they first encounter the open world. More>>

ALSO:

Werewolf: Journalism, History And Forgetting

Compare that [the saturation coverage of WWI] not just with the thinly reported anniversaries last year of key battles in the New Zealand Wars, but with the coverage of the very consequential present-day efforts to remedy the damage those wars wrought, and the picture is pretty dismal. More>>

ALSO:

Werewolf: Climate Of Fear

New Zealand, promoting itself as an efficient producer, has been operating as a factory farm for overseas markets with increasing intensity ever since the introduction of refrigerated shipping in 1882. The costs to native forests and to bio-diversity have been outlandish. The discussion of impacts has been minimal... More>>

ALSO:

Greek Riddles: Gordon Campbell On The Recent Smackdown Over Greece

There had been a fortnight of fevered buildup. Yet here we are in the aftermath of the February 28 showdown between the new Syriza government in Greece and the European Union “troika” and… no-one seems entirely sure what happened. Did the asteroid miss Earth? More>>

ALSO:

Keith Rankin: Contribution Through Innovation

The economic contribution of businesses and people is often quite unrelated to their taxable incomes. EHome, as a relatively new company, may have never earned any taxable income. Its successors almost certainly will earn income and pay tax. Yet it was eHome itself who made the biggest contribution by starting the venture in the first place. More>>

ALSO:

Get More From Scoop

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Top Scoops
Search Scoop  
 
 
Powered by Vodafone
NZ independent news