Top Scoops

Book Reviews | Gordon Campbell | Scoop News | Wellington Scoop | Community Scoop | Search

 

Get It Straight: Repeal Section 59 And Cut Crime

Anne Else's Letter from Elsewhere

Get It Straight: Repeal Section 59 And Help To Cut Crime

Wilful stupidity is really hard to deal with, but I’m going to try. The Sensible Sentencing Trust has just managed to pull off a difficult feat. In a strong field of stupid statements, its latest one on Sue Bradford’s Bill stands out for its utter idiocy.

In a nutshell, the Trust is telling Ministers and the public “Ban-smacking today / Build Prisons tomorrow”. In other words, repealing section 59 and removing the “reasonable force” defence for assaulting children will produce more criminals.

This claim is not just wrong, it is the complete opposite of the facts. Maltreating children in general, and assaulting them in particular, is very strongly linked with later criminal behaviour. Go into any prison and ask how many of the inmates were not frequently hit as children. You won’t get many hands up.

But don’t take my word for it – look at the research. Please. The clearest recent evidence comes from an April 2006 study called “Does Child Abuse Cause Crime?”* It looked at all the available US evidence on whether maltreatment of children was linked with later committing of crimes. The authors say that to their knowledge, “this is the first study of the effect of child abuse on future criminality in the economics literature”. (Given the high cost of crime, that’s odd, isn’t it.)

Overall, they found that child maltreatment roughly doubles the probability that an individual will engage in many types of crime. Having a parent who ever struck, hit or kicked them clearly increases the probability that an individual will undertake criminal activity, although as you would expect, the effect tends to be greater if the parent struck them frequently.

In other words, it is precisely the kind of physical abuse of children which Sue Bradford’s Bill is designed to make indefensible that is most strongly linked with later criminal behaviour. The only kind of maltreatment that is more strongly linked with committing crimes later is childhood sexual abuse. Oh, and poverty makes it all worse. If you’re poor and hit often as a child, you have a very high chance of ending up in prison.

Assaulting children is an activity in which New Zealand can fairly be called world-beating. Repealing section 59 will not directly stop this. What it will do is prevent the assaulting parents who get caught from getting off by claiming that they were simply using “reasonable force”. Over time, it will help to change the way we treat our children – and so go a long way towards cutting crime and halting the growth in the prison roster.

* Janet Currie [Columbia University, UCLA and NBER Department of Economics] and Erdal Tekin [Georgia State University and NBER Department of Economics], “Does Child Abuse Cause Crime?” April 2006, http://aysps.gsu.edu/publications/2006/downloads/CurrieTekin_ChildAbuse.pdf

(accessed 26/3/07)

*************

- Anne Else is a Wellington writer and social commentator. Her occasional column will typically appear on a Monday. You can subscribe to receive Letter From Elsewhere by email when it appears via the Free My Scoop News-By-Email Service

© Scoop Media

 
 
 
Top Scoops Headlines

 

Binoy Kampmark: Tom Wolfe The Parajournalist

As New Journalism’s primary advocate, Tom Wolfe headed the field with such experimental forces as Norman Mailer, Truman Capote and Hunter S. Thompson, all dedicated to enriching supposedly factual accounts with excessive flourishes that hurried out the beige in favour of the kaleidoscopic. More>>

Gordon Campbell: On Racism And The Windsors

For all the talk about the modernizing effect that Meghan Markle could have on the Royal Family, the suspicion all along has been that the House of Windsor is resistant to change at any level beyond the purely decorative. More>>

Gordon Campbell: On Prospects Of US Talks With North Korea

On June 12, the leaders of North Korea and the United States will meet across a table in Singapore, and Kim Jong Un must already be feeling giddy at the thought that this meeting is already being described with the word “summit” formerly reserved for meetings between superpowers of equal stature... Image: Steve Bolton NZ's contribution to the IAEA’s work on North Korea

  • United Nations - UN chief ‘optimistic’ over peace efforts
  • David Swanson - Enough is Enough. The Time Has Come to BDS the US - Peace Comes to Korea: Let’s Understand Why
  • CTBTO - CTBTO on North Korea
  • NZ Govt - NZ welcomes talks between North and South Korea
  • Massey University - Nukes to cyber war – NZ security in focus
  • Jim Miles - The Doomsday Machine - Confessions of a Nuclear War Planner
  • UNHCHR - North Korea detente: UN expert urges human rights opening
  • Binoy Kampmark - Trump, North Korea and Post-Olympic Angst
  • Gordon Campbell: On National’s Latest Attempts At Relevance

    Having ignored the existence of massive problems in health and education for nine years in government, it is no longer politically viable for National to maintain the pretence that such problems really don’t exist, or are somehow unworthy of serious concern by rational men of commerce.... More>>

    Gordon Campbell: On The Need For Immediate Action On WINZ

    So the old saying goes, the main difference between the centre-right and centre-left is that both believe in market solutions, but the centre-left spends a lot more time worrying about the effects, afterwards. More>>

    Gordon Campbell: On Petrol Pricing And The Midwives March

    The public brawl between Energy Minister Megan Woods and BP looks like spinning off – as brawls tend to do – into a whole array of extraneous matters. Evidently, some people find it hard to see the difference between taxes and profits. More>>