Book Reviews | Gordon Campbell | News Flashes | Scoop Features | Scoop Video | Strange & Bizarre | Search

 


Why "Generosity Sunday" on Holocaust Memorial Day?

Why Did We Put "Generosity Sunday" on Holocaust Memorial Day?


by Rabbi Michael Lerner

This Sunday, April 15, thousands of people will be holding "Generosity Sunday" events to launch a campaign for a Global Marshall Plan and urge the U.S. to change its fundamental orientation to foreign policy - away from the notion that homeland security is achieved through domination of other countries and peoples and culture and toward the notion that it can be achieved through a spirit of generosity and caring for the well-being of others. Our particular focus is on the Network of Spiritual Progressives' version of the Global Marshall Plan - a call to dedicate 1-5% of our Gross Domestic Product each year for the next twenty years to a program dedicated to eliminating global poverty, homelessness, hunger, inadequate education, inadequate health care, and repairing the global environment. Details at www.spiritualprogressives.org.

But what does this have to do with Holocaust Memorial Day,which also falls on April 15, a day that is dedicated to remembering the genocide that faced the Jewish people and which wiped out one out of every three Jews living on the planet at the time from?

Jews responded to the aftermath of the Holocaust by developing a slogan that said "Never Again."

But there were two different interpretations of that slogan. One said, "We will never let this happen to us again. We will acquire a state (Israel), an army, and we will dominate anyone who doesn't like us so that they will never be in a position to dominate us and do to us what was done to us for the past two thousand years of Christians entering our communities, raping, stealing, burning, and murdering us." I can understand how an oppressed people gets to the point of thinking that way, but unfortunately that became a slippery slope toward justifying oppressive behavior toward Palestinians and a culture of suspicion of others inside the Jewish community not unlike the culture of fear and suspicion that dominated the U.S. after 9/11.

The second interpretation was quite different. Hundreds of thousands of Jews around the world became deeply involved in social change movements seeking to challenge racism, sexism, homophobia, economic inequalities, and to champion peace, social justice, civil liberties and human rights. "Never Again" for these Jews meant that no one on the planet should ever have to face again what Jews faced during the Hohlocaust. No wonder, then, that these Jews became a major element in protesting segregation, apartheid, the war in Vietnam, the attempted genocide in Bosnia and Kosovo by Serbia, and now the destruction of Darfur. Instead of hearing "Never Again" in narrow nationalist terms (Never Again to us), these Jews heard it to mean "Never Again to Anyone."

There's another dimension of learning from the Holocaust that is still relevant today. The Nazis were able to win power because Germany and central Europe faced a huge economic breakdown after the First World War, largely caused by the conditions imposed on Germany by the victors (particularly the US, France and England). Millions of Germans faced close to starvation conditions, their savings wiped out, their lives shattered, and it was in this circumstance that the Nazi party won recruits and popularity by challenging the economic breakdown and promising the restoration of a "strong" and "safe" Germany. Unfortunately, many middle class Germans (including many middle class Jews), who had escaped the worst impact of the economic crisis, were too preoccupied with their own personal lives and their own pursuit of professional or economic advancement to notice as the world around them became increasingly filled with people looking for some path to security, safety and salvation and responded to the program of the Nazis who promised a return to a community in which people cared about each other (once they could get rid of the most selfish elements of the society, which they claimed were the Jews, a charge which then made it possible them to avoid addressing the capitalist system and the way it engendered an ethos of me-first-ism and selfishness).

This is really the choice facing the U.S. and other advanced industrial countries today: either to fall back into selfishness and try to protect what we have from the growing anger at the vast inequalities in the world today, or to respond with a spirit of caring for others, a Strategy of Generosity in which we share what we have and try to rectify the worst impact of the global market system. We'd need to change our trade arrangements with the world so that they no longer aimed to benefit the wealthy Western countries but to provide for the well-being of everyone. We'd need the Global Marshall Plan. And we'd need an open-hearted spirit of generosity that recognized that our own well-being in the 21st century depends on the well-being of everyone else on the planet, and on the well-being of the planet itself.

The Holocaust reminds us what can happen if we don't take care of each other and extend our boundaries of caring beyond those we normally think of as "us." In the 21st century, opening our hearts, our minds, and our bank accounts to the other, if done in a smart way (not dumping money into dictatorships or corrupt regimes, not giving for the sake of getting an immediate return but giving for the sake of manifesting a genuine caring) becomes the necessary prerequisite for saving our planet. The Holocaust nearly destroyed one people, but its message is a universal message, and it's a message that leads us to advocate for the Global Marshall Plan and the Strategy of Generosity both on Generosity Sunday and beyond.,

*************

Rabbi Michael Lerner is editor of Tikkun Magazine, rabbi of Beyt Tikkun synagogue in Berkeley, author of 11 books including the 2006 national best seller The Left Hand of God, and national chair of the Network of Spiritual Progressives which is organizing the ca

© Scoop Media

 
 
 
 
 
Top Scoops Headlines

 

Gordon Campbell: On The Latest Allegations Against Helen Clark

According to former PM and UNDP leader current Helen Clark, the allegations leveled at her this week in a Foreign Policy magazine article by the prize-winning UN journalist Colum Lynch have been ‘totally fabricated’. Hmmm. That would be very, very surprising. More>>

Letter From The Editor: The State Of Scoop

Gordon Campbell: The PledgeMe campaign currently being run by the Scoop Foundation does provide a useful opportunity to update you on what gets done with your money. Further down the track, other documents will set out what we plan to do, resources permitting. For now, lets stick with the practical nuts and bolts. More>>

ALSO:

Gordon Campbell: On The Rise Of The Far Right (And Battle Bots)

In his victory speech at the Cannes film festival this week, the British film director Ken Loach [pictued] warned that the rise of far right parties in Europe was being fuelled by the economic policies of austerity, and manifested in a welfare bureaucracy that systematically denies assistance to those in most need. More>>

Julienne Molineaux: Stuff-Me - The Newspaper Gobble-Up

In New Zealand, concentration of newspaper ownership via mergers and acquisitions has a long pre-digital history. The trends of declining readership and fragmented audiences began before digital content, and mergers and acquisitions proceeded apace, enabled by weak legislative protections. More>>

ALSO:

Scoop Foundation Membership Drive:

The Scoop Foundation: The best chance to create an independent guardian for public interest journalism in NZ

The Scoop Foundation is seeking public support to safeguard the future of public interest journalism in New Zealand. To ensure public access to comprehensive, free, timely news is maintained during this dark hour for journalism. And to provide every voice in NZ the opportunity to be heard in the national debate. More>>
PLEDGE NOW: Journalism: A New Model - The 2016 Scoop Foundation Membership Drive

Scoop Foundation Timeline:

Gordon Campbell: On Trump And The Madman Theory

Years ago, Richard Nixon explained to his chief adviser Bob Haldeman what has since become known as the “Madman Theory” of foreign policy. Basically, if America’s rivals could be reminded that Nixon was an unstable, rabid anti-Communist with his finger on the nuclear trigger, Nixon reasoned, then maybe they’d be less willing to challenge the US in the world’s hot spots… More>>

Australia And The South China Sea: Another Foreign Policy Blunder Looming

James O’Neill: The overblown rhetoric from the United States has led at least one commentator to describe so-called ‘analyses’ of the South China Sea situation as “the biggest load of analytical rubbish about South East Asia to emerge since the CIA mistook bee feces for a Soviet-supplied biological weapon in 1981.” More>>

Get More From Scoop

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Top Scoops
Search Scoop  
 
 
Powered by Vodafone
NZ independent news