Book Reviews | Gordon Campbell | News Flashes | Scoop Features | Scoop Video | Strange & Bizarre | Search


Local to Global, or Global to Local?

Meditations - From Martin LeFevre in California

Local to Global, or Global to Local?

The vast, inchoate vacuum into which we’ve all been thrown doesn’t even have a name. Calling it ‘global’ is like 19th century physicists talking about light propagation in the ‘ether.’ It refers to something everyone takes as a given, but for which no one can demonstrate tangible validity.

The philosophical and psychological collapse of the nation-state has made all thinking people into citizens without countries. Sure, the frameworks and functions of the State still exist, and most of us have passports that say ‘citizen of the USA,’ or ‘citizen of New Zealand,’ or ‘citizen of Saudi Arabia.’ But a passport does not a patriot make.

Not that being a patriot, which is defined as “somebody who proudly supports or defends his or her country and its way of life,” is a virtue. Perhaps it had limited value when coherent countries with clear boundaries existed. But in a world where nations survive in name only, pigheadedly hanging onto identification with ‘my country’ is clearly a vice.

Of course nationalism has always been at the root of what ails humankind--the primitive division between ‘us’ and ‘them’ that has produced thousands of wars since the beginning of civilization, and even before. But there is a huge difference between a cohesive people fighting against subjugation and for self-determination, and atomistic dividuals in the Empire anachronistically united in waving flags, building walls, and sending mercenary armies abroad.

Is reactionary nationalism on its last legs in the global society, even in militaristic America, or is it gaining momentum all over hell?

The erosion of the State and the growing threats of nationalism are precisely what make ours a time of real and present danger. Witness the Bush Administration. As the decisive Democratic and Republican races come down to the last few weeks before the January primaries, which will most likely pick the candidates and set the mold, the Democrats are largely avoiding the issue of ‘national security,’ while the Republicans are trumpeting their cave-man credentials. It’s crunch time.

We live in an age when promoting national security inevitably means increasing human insecurity. That principle applies to everyone. For example, Pakistan, which has at least a few dozen nuclear weapons, bleeds into Afghanistan, which bleeds into Iraq, which bleeds into Iran. When one of these or any of the other intertwined political or economic knots break, there will be a cascading effect on all of us that will be felt immediately. And not just in the price of gas at the pump, or a recession in the global economy.

Once the collapse occurs it will be too late to put an alternative to rapacious capitalism and the outmoded international order in place. What is to be done now?

There is the prevalent excuse that ‘I can’t get my head around things at the global level.’ That’s one of the reasons political globalization lags so far behind economic globalization.

Also, for many, the fear of top-down control or direction infuses their philosophy and limits their action, resulting in an inadequate response. Reactively attempting to reassert local management over global reality merely surrenders the field to voracious economic globalizers, who are only too willing to exploit every labor differential to increase their profit margins.

While local and regional initiatives are seedbeds of ideas and initiatives, they need to be placed in a genuinely global perspective from the outset. An adequate response to global warming, species extinction, and economic injustice (exemplified by the new, worldwide ‘food for oil’ program, in which corn feeds SUV’s rather than people) cannot be achieved by a local-to-global approach.

It isn’t just that local, regional and global initiatives are inseparable, but that the local/national reality has been completely superseded by the global nature of the environmental and societal emergency. The vain hope that local initiatives will someday, somehow miraculously replicate and crystallize into a coherent whole is woefully, even willfully naïve.

I recently spoke with an influential person in Ottawa, one of best and most important cities in the world, about the local vs. global approach. She is involved in putting in place such provincial ‘solutions’ as a barter system, and replacing currency with script. Having experienced such answers in a developing country, I can attest that people are no less likely to get screwed by their neighbors than they are by transnational corporations.

People are essentially the same everywhere; the difference is only a matter of scale. Good people can't pretend that we can ignore and reverse existing economies and policies of scale, but have to meet them with our own.

One cannot act globally if one doesn’t think globally. Solutions to egregious inequity and environmental catastrophe will not come from hunkering down in our localities, but from awakening ourselves and taking the whole and long view. We can then step into (or out of) the global vacuum, acting intelligently and responding adequately with like-minded people around the world.


- Martin LeFevre is a contemplative, and non-academic religious and political philosopher. He has been publishing in North America, Latin America, Africa, and Europe (and now New Zealand) for 20 years. Email: The author welcomes comments.

© Scoop Media

Top Scoops Headlines


Werewolf: Living With Rio’s Olympic Ruins

Mariana Cavalcanti Critics of the Olympic project can point a discernible pattern in the delivery of Olympics-related urban interventions: the belated but rushed inaugurations of faulty and/or unfinished infrastructures... More>>

Live Blog On Now: Open Source//Open Society Conference

The second annual Open Source Open Society Conference is a 2 day event taking place on 22-23 August 2016 at Michael Fowler Centre in Wellington… Scoop is hosting a live blog summarising the key points of this exciting conference. More>>



Gordon Campbell: On The Politicising Of The War On Drugs In Sport

It hasn’t been much fun at all to see how “war on drugs in sport” has become a proxy version of the Cold War, fixated on Russia. This weekend’s banning of the Russian long jumper Darya Klishina took that fixation to fresh extremes. More>>


Binoy Kampmark: Kevin Rudd’s Failed UN Secretary General Bid

Few sights are sadder in international diplomacy than seeing an aging figure desperate for honours. In a desperate effort to net them, he scurries around, cultivating, prodding, wishing to be noted. Finally, such an honour is netted, in all likelihood just to shut that overly keen individual up. More>>

Open Source / Open Society: The Scoop Foundation - An Open Model For NZ Media

Access to accurate, relevant and timely information is a crucial aspect of an open and transparent society. However, in our digital society information is in a state of flux with every aspect of its creation, delivery and consumption undergoing profound redefinition... More>>

Keeping Out The Vote: Gordon Campbell On The US Elections

I’ll focus here on just two ways that dis-enfranchisement is currently occurring in the US: (a) by the rigging of the boundary lines for voter districts and (b) by demanding elaborate photo IDs before people are allowed to cast their vote. More>>

Ramzy Baroud: Being Black Palestinian - Solidarity As A Welcome Pathology

It should come as no surprise that the loudest international solidarity that accompanied the continued spate of the killing of Black Americans comes from Palestine; that books have already been written and published by Palestinians about the plight of their Black brethren. In fact, that solidarity is mutual. More>>


Get More From Scoop

Top Scoops
Search Scoop  
Powered by Vodafone
NZ independent news