Book Reviews | Gordon Campbell | News Flashes | Scoop Features | Scoop Video | Strange & Bizarre | Search

 


Passing the Baton to Democracy?

Passing the Baton to Democracy?


By J. Sri Raman
t r u t h o u t | Perspective
http://www.truthout.org/docs_2006/120107C.shtml

Will Pervez Musharraf make history? Or will his latest moves merely mark a repetition of history? That is the all-important question before the 160 million people of Pakistan.

Glittering in a green sash and a brilliant row of medals and ribbons, General Musharraf, of course, claimed to be making history on November 28 when he handed over the army chief's baton to protege Ashfaq Pervez Kiyani at an impressive function. He affected a history-maker's halo once again the next day when he was sworn in as a civilian president in an elegant sherwani that bore no semblance at all to the "second skin" he was shedding.

On both occasions, he paid handsome tributes to his successor in the army, whom he had known "for more than 20 years." As he inspected the farewell parade and addressed the gathering of luminaries, including his own family members, however, did Musharraf remember what had happened nine eventful years ago?

In 1998, following the resignation of his predecessor General Jehangir Karamat, former prime minister and his present foe Nawaz Sharif personally promoted Musharraf over other senior officers as an "obedient and loyal officer" to be chief of army staff (COAS). Sharif considered Musharraf, known to be pro-West, as safe as the latter is reported to regard Kiyani with his reputation for professionalism as much as for chain-smoking and love of golf.

Sharif was not the first prime minister of Pakistan to make such a mistake. Zulfikar Ali Bhutto, father of his arch-rival Benazir Bhutto, made a similarly suicidal move when he appointed General Zia ul-Haq the COAS in April 1976, similarly ahead of a number of more senior officers.

Soon after the appointment, the shah of Iran visited Pakistan, and Bhutto reportedly introduced Zia to him in the following words: "Meet my new Army Chief. He is totally loyal to me. If I ask him to stand, he will stand. If I ask him to sit, he will sit. If I ask him to salute, he will salute. With him as the chief, the Army is in safe hands." Not long after that, Zia was to send Bhutto to the gallows and take power as a military dictator.

Earlier, previous military ruler General Ayub Khan, faced with domestic discontent, had handed over power to General Yahya Khan ahead of seven more senior generals in March 1969. Yahya proceeded immediately to impose martial law on Pakistan.

General Ayub Khan himself had been promoted out of turn to become COAS in January 1951, with then-civilian Pakistani leader Iskander Mirza choosing him for his "loyalty." Khan was soon to depose Mirza and deport him to London in a bloodless coup, to assume the unbridled powers of a military ruler.

Little wonder that there is a lot of speculation already about how long the present Musharraf dispensation will last. Quite a few observers in Pakistan do not rule out the possibility of Kiyani acting at some point of time on behalf of "patriotic armed forces," as others have done before him. The likelihood is considered all the greater for Kiyani's well-known connections as a former chief of Pakistan's Inter-Services Intelligence (ISI) with the Pentagon and the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA).

Thus, the Musharraf moves, supposed to mark a civilian-military transition, may lead to yet another civilian-military tussle. Any confrontation between Musharraf and Kiyani, however, will not mean one between democracy and military dictatorship.

President Musharraf, of course, has been at pains to project his change of costume as an answer to the challenge of democracy. By doffing his uniform at the right time, he claims, he has saved "the third stage" of the country's democratic process from "derailment" (the first stage being the immediately post-Sharif phase and the second the period after what everyone else saw as rigged elections to provincial assemblies.

To the majority of Pakistanis, what Musharraf has put back on the tracks would appear to be a train to a destination very different from any known form of democracy. There are two major reasons why the president's much-vaunted "roadmap" to democracy does not make even remote sense to many.

The first reason lies in utter uncertainty not only about the elections but in where they will lead. Even if all the major political parties are persuaded to participate in the polls, the people will still not know what they are voting for. Both Bhutto and Sharif have sworn that they won't hold political office under Musharraf, whom they consider a president without constitutional authority. If the ex-prime ministers stick to their stand, the elections will lead only to an extension of the country's political crisis.

The second and the more serious limitation of the president-ordained democratic process lies in the remote control to which the "roadmap" has been subjected. It took a clear directive from Washington for the general to hang up his uniform. And a warning from the White house was needed to make Musharraf announce an end to martial law which he had earlier insisted upon as a mandatory condition for the conduct of "free and fair" elections.

To bemused Pakistani voters, a dispensation where pressure from the people prevails may better appear to deserve description as a democracy.

*************

A freelance journalist and a peace activist in India, J. Sri Raman is the author of "Flashpoint" (Common Courage Press, USA). He is a regular contributor to Truthout.

© Scoop Media

 
 
 
 
 
Top Scoops Headlines

 

Werewolf: Living With Rio’s Olympic Ruins

Mariana Cavalcanti Critics of the Olympic project can point a discernible pattern in the delivery of Olympics-related urban interventions: the belated but rushed inaugurations of faulty and/or unfinished infrastructures... More>>

Live Blog On Now: Open Source//Open Society Conference

The second annual Open Source Open Society Conference is a 2 day event taking place on 22-23 August 2016 at Michael Fowler Centre in Wellington… Scoop is hosting a live blog summarising the key points of this exciting conference. More>>

ALSO:

Buildup:

Gordon Campbell: On The Politicising Of The War On Drugs In Sport

It hasn’t been much fun at all to see how “war on drugs in sport” has become a proxy version of the Cold War, fixated on Russia. This weekend’s banning of the Russian long jumper Darya Klishina took that fixation to fresh extremes. More>>

ALSO:

Binoy Kampmark: Kevin Rudd’s Failed UN Secretary General Bid

Few sights are sadder in international diplomacy than seeing an aging figure desperate for honours. In a desperate effort to net them, he scurries around, cultivating, prodding, wishing to be noted. Finally, such an honour is netted, in all likelihood just to shut that overly keen individual up. More>>

Open Source / Open Society: The Scoop Foundation - An Open Model For NZ Media

Access to accurate, relevant and timely information is a crucial aspect of an open and transparent society. However, in our digital society information is in a state of flux with every aspect of its creation, delivery and consumption undergoing profound redefinition... More>>

Keeping Out The Vote: Gordon Campbell On The US Elections

I’ll focus here on just two ways that dis-enfranchisement is currently occurring in the US: (a) by the rigging of the boundary lines for voter districts and (b) by demanding elaborate photo IDs before people are allowed to cast their vote. More>>

Ramzy Baroud: Being Black Palestinian - Solidarity As A Welcome Pathology

It should come as no surprise that the loudest international solidarity that accompanied the continued spate of the killing of Black Americans comes from Palestine; that books have already been written and published by Palestinians about the plight of their Black brethren. In fact, that solidarity is mutual. More>>

ALSO:


Get More From Scoop

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Top Scoops
Search Scoop  
 
 
Powered by Vodafone
NZ independent news