Waihopai and the Troublesome Priest
Waihopai and the Troublesome
Priest
Interesting
headline in the NZ Herald this morning about the Waihopai
spy base invasion : “ Spy Base Priest’s History of
Trouble…” In fact, the only ‘trouble” the Herald
can dig up on Dominican priest Peter Murnane is that he
took in the Algerian asylum seeker Ahmed Zaoui. Right. So
he enabled a recognised refugee and an asylum seeker to be
kept in humane conditions until the claims against him were
proven to be unfounded. Sounds like a very bad egg. Oh, and
he once spilt blood on the floor of the US consulate in
Auckland, as a protest against the Iraq war. I guess that
really means Murnane has been trouble for the Establishment
and for Granny Herald, its media mouthpiece. Who, to this
day, still can’t get its Zaoui story straight.
This morning for instance it carries this sentence :
“Australian-born Peter Murnane provided accommodation in
Auckland to Ahmed Zaoui, the Algerian refugee accused of
being a terrorist but later cleared.” To repeat for the
1,000th time for the Herald’s benefit : Zaoui was never
accused by the authorities of being a terrorist, so he could
hardly be cleared later, of a charge that was never laid.
As usual, Ron Mark doesn’t let the fact that the hysteria
over Zaoui was finally proven groundless last year stop him
from launching another ridiculous panic attack on the
Algerian :
“We wonder if the people who stupidly
broke into the base, causing a lot of expensive damage,
maintain their links with Mr Zaoui and his ilk. Will the
courts give them more terrorist suspects to look after?”
etc etc. Mark wonders darkly whether ‘a fifth column of
activists’ exists in this country. He’s right.
They’re under his bed, cackling silently.
For the
record, even Crown Law Office lawyers told our highest
courts that Zaoui was not considered a terrorist risk.
Instead, the SIS Director chose to withdraw a certificate
claiming he was a risk to national security - the meaning
of which, in their view, included giving us a bad look. And
why did the SIS backtrack? Because for four years, it had
put the wrong spin on Zaoui’s political history. Am I
nitpicking? No. The Zaoui family is trying to make a new
life in Auckland, and it doesn’t need the local newspaper,
or an idiot like Ron Mark, re-raising a baseless ‘
terrorist’ slur against him.
Back to Waihopai. In
the coming weeks and months, it will be interesting to see
which charges are laid is against the Waihopai Three. As in
the ‘ terrorism’ raids in the Ureweras last year, the
authorities may be happier to press lesser charges – arms
charges in the Ureweras, trespass and wilful property damage
charges here – than to lay the kind of charges (e.g.
sabotage) that would give the accused the chance to raise
in court the wider national and international security
dimensions of their protest action, and of whatever it is
the GCSB do. If the role of the GCSB – sorry, if the
GCSB’s ‘history of trouble’ – is deemed relevant, we
might even have the agency’s embarrassing past incidents
dragged into the courtroom, via the accidentally archived
Lange papers, such as its spying on UN diplomatic missions
on behalf of the Americans.
So far, there hasn’t
been much effort put into up-dating what the Waihopai
actually does these days. Basically, the GCSB ( and other
linked bases in the network) intercept regional civilian
communications that are transmitted by satellite, download
these stolen communications and send them in unprocessed
form on to the NSA in Langley, Virginia. Presumably, these
intercepts can range from diplomatic communiqués from
countries that are our trading partners and rivals, to
satellite phone messages from…almost anyone.
How
this activity feeds into and assists the actual war making
effort on the ground in in Afghanistan or Iraq is not
readily apparent – to me, anyway. Historically, from the
time it was founded by Father Philip Berrigan and other
radical Catholics protesting against the Vietnam War, most
Ploughshares actions I’m aware of overseas ( against war
planes, missiles etc) have had a more direct connection
between the protest action and the war weaponry than seems
the case at Waihopai.
So if anyone out there does
have reliable information on whether and how the Waihopai
and/or Tangimoana bases play a direct military role - say,
in the positioning of Predator drones or other GPS
dependent weaponry - I’d be interested in hearing about
it.
ENDS