Top Scoops

Book Reviews | Gordon Campbell | Scoop News | Wellington Scoop | Community Scoop | Search


Pen And Paper Vs. Electronic Voting Machine

"Satisfaction guaranteed or your money back" - Pen and Paper vs. Electronic Voting Machine"

By Joan Brunwasser,

I love fall! At this time of year, in the Midwest where I grew up, leaves are already changing color. I remember walking home from school, shuffling merrily through crackling mounds of leaves, conveniently piled at the curb. The air smelled like burning leaves (and those infernal blowers had not yet been invented).

I loved shopping for school clothes. I dithered every year about exactly what to wear on that first day of school, when we were all eager to make a good impression – ostensibly, on our teachers, but really on one another.

Most of all, I loved getting new school supplies. I relished the chance to wander the aisles of my favorite stores, carefully perusing before finally choosing the best pens and pencils, the most pristine packages of notebook paper, the coolest notebook, and the book bag with the most pockets.

Even getting a new Chandler’s assignment notebook was a thrill, its very emptiness hinting of promise. Back then, Chandler’s came in only one or two colors. Nevertheless, picking out a new one to fill up signaled, in a tangible way, a fresh start. I was so eager with anticipation that I usually tossed and turned the night before the first day of school. Those were the days!

Fast forward to the present. I no longer take my children, now grown up, to buy school supplies. Apparently, however, I have subconsciously refused to let go of this annual ritual. This may explain why, at the tail end of summer, I feel an irresistible urge to head out for office supplies.

I’m sure that all professionals obsess about their tools of the trade. Being a writer, I am very particular about the writing implements I use. I check each item carefully. If I have a choice, I prefer not to buy goods made in China. I also check to see if the manufacturer offers any warranties or guarantees of quality.

I'm going to reproduce below the exact wording of the guarantees I saw, for reasons that will become apparent later.

• Zebra Pen Corp. (Indonesia): Zebra Pen Corp. guarantees the performance of this writing instrument. If it fails to perform properly, please return it to Zebra Pen Corp. for repair or replacement.

• Sharpie highlighter, (USA): If your product does not perform properly, please return for replacement.

• BIC pens (France): If you are not satisfied with the performance of this product, please return it to BIC and we will gladly replace it at no cost to you.

• Parker pens (USA): Your PARKER writing instrument is guaranteed for two years from the date of original purchase against defects in materials or workmanship. If found to be defective within the warranty period, your PARKER product will be repaired or replaced free of charge.

• Foray ballpoint pens (India): Our products have been tested by third party, independent research specialists and are guaranteed to be free of defects in materials and workmanship, or your money back!

On this shopping trip, I spent no more than $20 for a year’s supply of pens. The most expensive item I bought cost just a few dollars. Yet each package came with a guarantee. Right there in black and white: Satisfaction guaranteed, via repair, exchange, or refund.

Our infamous electronic voting machines, on the other hand, come with no such guarantees. Remind me again, just why the companies that design them can't stand behind their products or give us our money back? Exactly what kind of contracts did our designated representatives sign, what was in the small print, and what kind of accountability was written in there (or not)? We should examine those contracts and see what we all signed on for. That information has not been made readily available to the public. I wonder why not.

Privatizing our elections was a bad idea and investing in electronic voting machines has proven to be a colossal waste of money. Our voting system, with machines that constantly malfunction and remain vulnerable to hacking, is both unworkable and fiscally irresponsible. We're not just talking about machinery; we're talking about the vote-counting apparatus that is the basis of our democratic way of life.

High-tech isn’t always better. The pen that NASA began using in 1965 was developed by the Fisher Pen Co., which invested $1 million in its design and production. While the Russian space program now uses those same space pens, the Russians initially solved the problem quite simply – by using grease pencils!

So, how about an alternative to expensive and unreliable electronic voting? For a fraction of the money already spent on electronic voting systems, each voter could take home a handsome, American-made Parker pen after recording his/her vote on a paper ballot. Citizens of all political persuasions could observe the vote being counted as poll workers and election officials stayed late to hand count the paper ballots (in the precinct, on Election Night). The poll workers could take home a handful of pens, a sign of the public's gratitude. The voters could be confident that their votes were counted as cast. Moreover, We the People, rather than private, for profit corporations, would be back in charge of our elections. In this scenario, our votes – as well as those souvenir pens – would be guaranteed. That’s what I call a win-win situation!

Ellen Theisen's Vendors are Undermining the Structure of U.S. Elections is recommended for anyone concerned - or even curious - about the perils of electronic voting and privatizing our elections. Pitch in and help spread the word!



Joan Brunwasser is a co-founder of Citizens for Election Reform (CER) which exists for the sole purpose of raising the public awareness of the critical need for election reform. We aim to restore fair, accurate, transparent, secure elections where votes are cast in private and counted in public. Electronic (computerized) voting systems are simply antithetical to democratic principles.

CER set up a lending library to achieve the widespread distribution of the DVD Invisible Ballots: A temptation for electronic vote fraud. Within eighteen months, the project had distributed over 3200 copies across the country and beyond. CER now concentrates on group showings, OpEd pieces, articles, reviews, interviews, discussion sessions, networking, conferences, anything that promotes awareness of this critical problem. Joan has been Election Integrity Editor for OpEdNews since December, 2005.

© Scoop Media

Top Scoops Headlines


Any Questions: Scoop Launches New Q&A Website

It’s an easy way to find out party positions and allows you to view candidates’ answers side by side. It’s also a way for you to make your voice heard this election, and get the parties talking about the things that are important to you. More>>


Binoy Kampmark: Trump And Afghanistan

Donald Trump did what US Presidents have done since George W. Bush: commit. Commit, that is, to the mission; commit more promises; and commit more thoughts to blotted paper about the war that never ends in the graveyard of empires. More>>


Rawiri Taonui: The Maori Election

The election battle for the Maori seats 2017 opened last year when Maori Party President Tuku Morgan announced a peace deal with the Mana Movement aimed at securing all the Maori seats and holding the balance of power. More>>

Scoop HiveMind Project: Universal Basic Income - Are We Up For It?

This is an opportunity for you as one of the 4 million potential funders and recipients of a Universal Basic Income to collectively consider the issue:
1. Is UBI is a desirable policy for New Zealand; and
2. How should a UBI system work in practice. More>>


Lyndon Hood: National Announces Plan To Hit Youth With Big Mallets

The National party has announced its youth justice policy, which includes a controversial plan for recidivist serious youth offenders to be hit over the head with a comically large rubber mallet. More>>