Top Scoops

Book Reviews | Gordon Campbell | Scoop News | Wellington Scoop | Community Scoop | Search

 

Consultation On Waterfront Plans To Be Cut Short

Wellington.Scoop

City Council plans to curb public
opposition to new waterfront buildings


by Lindsay Shelton

Just days before councillors are due to debate major amendments to the city’s District Plan, the Wellington City Council has released 79 pages of documents about the proposed changes (in four parts: Part 1, Part 2, Part 3. Part 4).

The proposals appear to have been given impetus by the council’s defeat in the Environment Court, which stopped its plan – approved by council officers - to allow a Hilton Hotel to be built on the Outer T of Queens Wharf.

An immediate effect of the changes would be to allow council officers to approve new buildings in the Kumutoto area of the Wellington waterfront, without notifying the public of the individual building plans and thereby removing any right to object.

Observers who have studied the council documents believe that this power could also stop the possibility of appeals to the Environment Court against any specific new buildings, such as the appeal which stopped the Hilton.

Councillors are to debate the changes at a meeting on Thursday (December 4.) The documents appeared on the council’s website the previous Friday, before copies had been received by councillors themselves.

The changes – by which the council would grant itself powers to give the go-ahead to new buildings without any public scrutiny - have been named Variation 11.

Page 10 of the 34-page Appendix 1 (which is part of the proposal for change) provides a map showing where the council proposes to allow three new buildings in the Kumutoto area. Site 10, the biggest site, will allow a building which is six storeys high.

Page 12 of the Appendix provides an aerial view of the footprints of the three new buildings.

A design guide for the area is proposed, but the council says that developers would have “an infinite range of design solutions” for new buildings, subject only to the design guide.

One immediate effect would be to reduce views of Wellington harbour.

The current vistas at the Whitmore Street gates would be replaced by “space framed by buildings on either side.” The preference of the council’s planners: that “buildings … should frame the views.”

The proposed changes would not completely remove the public’s ability to comment on the council’s enthusiasm for big new buildings on the edge of the harbour.

But public input will be restricted to involvement “at the initial plan variation stage.”

After this initial planning period, states the council, “there may not be the opportunity for further challenge and possible appeals when subsequent resource consent hearings are made.”

For the council, this will “greatly simplify the process.”

For the citizens of Wellington, any ability to oppose specific new buildings on the waterfront will have been ended.

The council doesn’t deny that there has been opposition in the past. Attachment 1 of its proposal bravely acknowledges two major examples (in 1989 and 1998) of public opposition to large new buildings on the waterfront, opposition which was so strong that planning regimes were replaced.

It now appears to have invented a strategy which would ensure that any future opposition wouldn’t be given a chance.

What happens next?

If the proposals are approved by councillors on Thursday night, the public can scrutinise the 79 pages of documents and decide whether to object to the overall plan for Kumutoto. If specific plans for individual buildings are to be removed from public scrutiny, then the initial planning process – including the new design guide - will be the only chance for the public to be heard.

And what’s in store for the rest of the waterfront? There’s a general expectation that the same policy is likely to be applied to other areas including Waitangi Park, where the council has kept four sites which it specifies are for big new buildings.

2 December, 2008

© Scoop Media

 
 
 
Top Scoops Headlines

 

Gordon Campbell: On The Brexit Vote Aftermath

So, what happens next? Normally when a major policy like this gets so crushingly rejected – by 230 votes, when Theresa May had reportedly been hoping for a defeat by “only” 70- 100 votes – the PM would resign and/or a fresh election called. More>>


Gordon Campbell: On Our History Of Selling Out The Kurds

For the past 100 years, the West has sold out the Kurds over and over again. So much so that it came as a surprise yesterday when US National Security advisor John Bolton appeared to walk back the latest act of betrayal... More>>

ALSO:

Gordon Campbell: On The Reactionary Politics Of Fear

What do you call a situation where the state tries to create panic among its own people for party political gain? As practiced by Theresa May and her faction of the Conservative Party, this has become a well-honed form of state terrorism… More>>

Viva Scoop 3.0! Rounding Up 2018 And Looking Ahead

2018 has been quite a year for Scoop. We are so thrilled to have successfully met the funding target for the first stage of the ‘Scoop 3.0’ plan raising $36,000. This means we can now proceed with the planning phase for the delivery of this bold vision for a community-owned, participatory, independent newsroom... More>>

ALSO:

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  • PublicAddress
  • Pundit
  • Kiwiblog