Comment & Opinion | Book Reviews | Car Reviews | Daily News Summaries | Gordon Campbell | News Flashes | Scoop Features | Scoop Video | Strange & Bizarre | Unanswered Questions | More Categories

 


Michael Collins: Ship Of State Or Ship Of Fools

Ship Of State Or Ship Of Fools



The Money Party at Work


We keep doing the same things over and over again expecting different results.


Michael Collins

Who are the officers guiding our ship of state, steering us through the troubled waters of a failed economy and two tragic and costly wars?

Do we have bold leaders ready to move us away from the failed policies that generated a free market kleptocracy for insiders and their masters, the ultra wealthy?

Are they brilliant tacticians who can think far enough outside of the box to get us out of calamitous foreign adventures that generate nothing but death, destruction, and ill will on the part of those we seek to "help"?

At the start of President Obama's administration, it was clear that this would be a cabinet that spanned those few degrees of that mythical political spectrum called "the middle." The political middle, like the Hobbits' "middle earth," is a contrivance, although much less artful. It's where you're supposed to be if you're the president. You stand for those who count; those with the vested interests in the economy. You are that special gatekeeper at the intersection between avarice and the nation's wealth.

Will anything truly change?

We can tell by the key players in domestic and foreign policy.

Chief economic adviser Larry Summers and Secretary of the Treasury Tim Geithner are the stewards of economic policy and programs. They have a long public track record. Summers was a key player in repealing the Glass Steagall Act in 1999. In place since the Great Depression, that law prevented banks from wild, risky speculation. Since it was repealed in 1999, banks have run free doing the very things that the act prevented.

Summers was also a key player in the passage of the Commodity Services Modernization Act of 2000. That act brought back derivatives which had been illegal since 1906. These highly speculative market products were the very thing Glass-Steagall would have prevented.

Geithner served as one of the nation's top bank regulators as Chairman of the Federal Reserve Bank of New York, the most powerful Fed by far. He had his own stress test for banks in 2007 and thought everything was fine. Most of those banks are so stressed two years later that they require welfare from the federal government just to stay afloat.

Summers is guiding government policy in the most spectacular welfare program of all - Wall Street welfare. Banks have now received twice as much in welfare payments as they received under Bush and its just beginning.

As Treasury secretary, Geithner is making this happen. He's also working to see that the Federal Reserve offered trillions more in credit guarantees for the failed banks and bankers. Geithner also ratified what most experts called an illegal tax break for the nation's largest banks written into code by a Bush Treasury staffer. It's a $140 billion giveaway that no one will even talk about. By failing to repeal or even discuss it, it's become Geithner's giveaway.

Citizens aren't doing so well. The foreclosure relief bill failed despite Senator Richard Durbin's (D-IL) exceptional effort. That would have kept 1.7 million families in their homes. No help on that one from Summers and Geithner. The credit card bill of rights failed to cap interest rates on credit cards. The 29% rates common at any bank's whim, could have been capped at 15%, President Obama's suggestion.

But there were no breaks for us. Our so-called credit card bill of rights lacks the one right that would have helped -- a ban on usurious fees from the failed banks. We don't get any special tax code changes from Treasury staffers but the banks get $140 billion that simply stays in place because no one in power seems to care. This makes it clear to us who really counts.

Our foreign policy is changing in some ways. We're supposedly reducing our commitment to the war in Iraq but increasing it in Afghanistan. Perennial diplomatic envoy Richard Holbrooke made his views clear when he signed on with Madeleine Albright and other notables to advocate a more aggressive military policy in the Middle East.

The media anointed peace maker is now the president's special envoy to South Asia. He showed his stuff during an April visit to Pakistan. The diplomacy was so adept that the trip was described by a U.S. scholar as "the worst-ever visit" by an American team to South Asia in history. It was a complete disaster."

That diplomacy was complicated by the policies of General David Petraeus, Commander of the United States Central Command. He's responsible for the Predator drone (unmanned killer aircraft) attacks on Pakistan's western region. The drones do a good job of killing both Taliban rebels and innocent Pakistanis. Pakistani's are taking special exception to their fellow citizens being killed by outsiders, the Taliban or robot killer drones.

They'll be seeing more of that in the near future, perhaps. The new policy in neighboring Afghanistan will involve a lot of killing if past records indicate future performance. General Petraeus appointed General Stanley McCrystal to lead the war in Afghanistan. Former head of the top secret Joint Special Operations Command, McCrystal has a reputation for rough tactics that get the job done. Seymour Hersh called the group "an executive assassination ring" that reported directly to Bush and Cheney in the past.

Summers and Geithner have been wrong for over a decade. They supported from the massive deregulation of banks and the enabling of the complicated Ponzi scheme referred to as derivatives. They've continued the flow of trillions from the U.S. Treasury to failed Wall Street financial instructions. And there's no record that they've done anything directly for the vast majority of citizens.

Holbrooke is a constant warrior in diplomat's clothing. He even implied a threat of another 9/11 with the absurd claim that 5,000 Taliban thugs were going to take over Pakistan's nuclear weapons to scare the public into supporting a blank check in South Asia.

General Petraeus has filled in the details of that check despite the lack of public response to Holbrooke's scare tactics. It's going to involve just the type of highly aggressive campaign in Afghanistan that has made us enemies throughout the Middle East.

Is this what we voted for? We've got two Wall Street veterans presiding over the continued looting of the Treasury in behalf of failed banks and financiers. While CEO's keep their jobs at insolvent banks, citizens get nothing. After seven years in war based on shameless lies and over a million dead, we're about to move the action to Afghanistan. We keep doing the same things over and over again and expect different results.

All aboard the Ship of Fools.

END

Annotated references

Images: Geithner, Summers, Petraeus, Holbrooke

Permission to reproduce in whole or in part with attribution of authorship, a link to this article, and acknowledgement of images as listed.


 
 
Top Scoops Headlines

 

John Minto: Hone Harawira - Speaking Truth To Power

John Minto writes: None of this should need to be said but the reaction of so many to Harawira's angry email resembles the deeply embedded racism which Don Brash tapped into so successfully a few years back at Orewa. More >>

Damien Baker: Profits Mask Food Shortages in a Land of Plenty

The petroleum industry arrived in the Lake Kutubu area, around 20 years ago with Chevron and BP and soon the delicate ecological balance often in play in remote areas began to shift. More >>

The Israeli Exception: Gilo And East Jerusalem

In 1987, the conservative author Midge Decter described her association with Israel and those willing to place it above conventional judgment. ‘We know ourselves to be bound by ties so deep, so essential, so unconditional, that they are beyond daylight... More >>

Gordon Campbell: The 9/11 Terrorists On Trial

For years, human rights advocates have argued that terrorism is essentially criminal behaviour, and terrorists should therefore be tried under the rules of due process that democratic states have developed over centuries for dealing fairly with crime... More >>

Paul Buchanan: The Strategic Utility of Terrorism (and why jihadism is losing)

A Word From Afar: Paul Buchanan writes: One of the axioms of counter-terrorism is that the nastiness of the atrocity is inversely proportional to the terrorist’s chances of success. That is to say, the worse the act, then less likely that terrorist... More >>

East Timor: The Role Of Journalists In The Freedom Struggle

The struggle for justice is not a contest between Indonesians and non-Indonesians. Rather, it is a contest between those around the world who want to justice to prevail and those who want to see impunity prevail... More >>

Globalization Unchecked: How Alien Media is Suffocating Real Culture

A Muslim family sits across of me in café, in a largely Muslim Asia country. An older woman shyly hunches over and desperately trying to avoid eye contact with the giant plasma screen TV, blazing loud music on the popular music video channel, MTV. ... More >>

Martin LeFevre: Falling Leaves, and Squirrels

One is so accustomed to seeing the gray squirrels in the parkland leap from branch to branch with perfect dexterity that it came as quite a shock to see one miss his mark and fall into the creek. More >>

MOST READ HEADLINES

More RSS  RSS
 
 
 
powered by newsagent
NZ independent news