Book Reviews | Gordon Campbell | News Flashes | Scoop Features | Scoop Video | Strange & Bizarre | Search

 


Where is the Bush Shoe Thrower Now?

After Throwing Shoes at Bush, Where Is al-Zaidi Now?

By David Swanson

Muntadhar al-Zaidi famously threw his shoes at President George W. Bush in December 2008, kicking off a stream of shoe-throwing protests around Iraq and the world. He then spent nine months in jail. TheRealNews.com has now posted a four-part video interview in which al-Zaidi reveals, to the certain bewilderment of many Americans, that he has absolutely no notion of "hating us for our freedoms." In fact, al-Zaidi lists completely unrelated grievances not unlike those listed by every other individual ever alleged to have hated us for out freedoms. It's enough to make you almost suspect there was a pattern, if you didn't know better.

Al-Zaidi says in Part 1 of the interview, in which he also lists his grievances with the United States, that he expected and was prepared to be killed immediately for throwing his shoes at Bush's head. He left behind a videotaped statement and a will, he says. Al-Zaidi had been working as a broadcast journalist for Al-Baghdadia TV, and writing about the U.S. occupation of Iraq. He says that he did not believe the world was reading his writings, and that throwing his shoes at Bush was a means of grabbing people's attention. It certainly worked, at least temporarily.

In Part 2 of the video, al-Zaidi describes the kind of stories he had been reporting on, including many American war crimes. He describes an incident he reported on in which Americans raped and murdered and then tried to make their crime appear to be sectarian and Iraqi. Al-Zaidi preaches vengeance and explains his duty to pay Bush back for the mass-murder of his countrymen and women. That Americans' similar habit of thinking in terms of revenge, albeit for fictional wrongs, was what allowed Bush to begin the war and continue it may not have occurred to al-Zaidi, and it hardly seems our place to tell Iraqis about the evils of revenge in their legal resistance while our nation uses a combination of revenge and lies to launch illegal wars. Nonetheless, al-Zaidi is on the wrong path here.

Al-Zaidi says that when he threw his shoes, he was beaten and tortured by Iraqis working with Americans for a few days until his brother spoke out publicly against this abuse. Al-Zaidi was then held in solitary confinement for three months, which he describes as worse than the physical torture. Al-Zaidi remained in jail for six more months following a trial (of him, of course, not of Bush). The Iraqi media did not, for the most part, cover his torturing, al-Zaidi says in Part 3, because the media in Iraq is largely controlled by the United States and its collaborators.

Asked his opinion on President Obama and whether he would throw shoes at him too, al-Zaidi says the change in president means nothing, that the important thing is withdrawal. Iraqis may lose patience if the withdrawal is delayed, al-Zaidi warns.

Asked whether Iraq will be worse off if the United States leaves, al-Zaidi replies that those destabilizing Iraq are the United States and its allies, and that Iraq has already seen massive sectarian violence even during the occupation. The level of hatred and violence between Sunnis and Shias one hears about in the media, however, is not real, al-Zaidi says, comparing it to the pre-war lies about "weapons of mass destruction."

In Part 4, al-Zaidi says he's seen no evidence that the United States will withdraw from Iraq. He thinks the stage is being set to create a pretext for extending the occupation. This, al-Zaidi says, is in the interest of politicians who are working with and depending on the United States. But the primary demand from the Iraqi people, al-Zaidi makes clear, is that all US troops and mercenaries leave immediately.

Here is the video.

*************

David Swanson is the author of the new book "Daybreak: Undoing the Imperial Presidency and Forming a More Perfect Union" by Seven Stories Press. You can order it and find out when tour will be in your town: http://davidswanson.org/book.
To receive updates from After Downing Street register at
http://afterdowningstreet.org/user/register
To subscribe to or unsubscribe from other lists go to
http://davidswanson.org/lists

© Scoop Media

 
 
 
 
 
Top Scoops Headlines

 

Binoy Kampmark: Dysfunctional Hagiography: Australia & Gough Whitlam's Death

Hagiography is the curse of the Australian Labor movement. It is a movement that searches for, and craves, mythical figures and myths. Such a phenomenon might be termed mummification, and detracts from closer examination. More>>

David Swanson: On Killing Trayvons

This Wednesday is a day of action that some are calling a national day of action against police brutality, with others adding 'and mass incarceration,' and I'd like to add 'and war' and make it global rather than national. More>>

Uri Avnery: Israel Ignoring “Tectonic Change” In Public Opinion

If the British parliament had adopted a resolution in favour of the Israeli occupation of the West Bank, the reaction of our media would have been like this: More>>

ALSO:

| UK MPs blow a “raspberry” at Netanyahu and his serfs

Byron Clark: Fiji Election: Crooks In Suits

On September 17 Fiji held its first election since Voreqe “Frank” Bainimarama seized power in a 2006 coup. With his Fiji First party receiving 59.2% of the vote, Bainimarama will remain in power. More>>

Ramzy Baroud: ‘Islamic State’ Sectarianism Is Not Coincidental

Consider this comical scene described by Peter Van Buren, a former US diplomat, who was deployed to Iraq on a 12-month assignment in 2009-10: Van Buren led two Department of State teams assigned with the abstract mission of the ‘reconstruction’ of ... More>>

Gordon Campbell: On The Case For Using Air Power Against The Islamic State

There is an Alice Through the Looking Glass quality to the current response to the Islamic State. Everything about it seems inside out. Many people who would normally oppose US air strikes in other countries have reluctantly endorsed the bombing of IS positions in Iraq and Syria – not because they think air power alone will defeat IS (clearly it won’t) but because it will slow it down, and impede its ability to function. More>>

ALSO:

Get More From Scoop

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Top Scoops
Search Scoop  
 
 
Powered by Vodafone
NZ independent news