Top Scoops

Book Reviews | Gordon Campbell | Scoop News | Wellington Scoop | Community Scoop | Search

 

NZ On Air Independence & TV3 Poverty Doco: OIA Documents

"NZ On Air Independence Under Threat Over TV3 Child Poverty Doco": Raw Documents

NZ on air, beehive, goldfish, broadcasting, political
interference
Click to enlarge.

Previously on Scoop Tom Frewen revealed the funding agency New Zealand on Air was considering changing its rules to prevent publically-funded political content screening during election campaigns, following alarm from the board at TV3's decision to schedule the documentary Inside Child Poverty days before the 2011 general election.

The documents below were released by NZ on Air under the Official Information Act (scanned in PDF format, email addresses have been redacted by Scoop).

***

17/11/11: NZ on Air Chief Executive Jane Wrightson, seeking information following board member (also John Key’s electorate chairman and the National Party’s northern region deputy chairman) Stephen McElrea's message (to Wrightson and NZOA Chairman Neil Walter) point out Inside Child Poverty scheduling.

McElrea: "Was NZOA aware that this doco was to be scheduled 4 days before the election? If not, should we have been? To me, it falls into the area of caution we show about political satire near elections."


18/11/11: Neil Walter to NZOA board, on sending the Minister a "heads-up" and registering "strong disappointment" with TV3 (the following two documents attached).

"Time will tell how badly we have been dropped in it."

18/11/11: Wrightson letter to Sussan Turner, Managing Director of TV3 owner MediaWorks.

"While we do not interfere in editorial content, and do not involve ourselves in your scheduling decisions, we want to make clear the extent of our discomfort and disappointment with the scheduling of the programme at this time."

18/11/11: Wrightson to the Minister's office.

"We consider that we have been dropped in it on this occasion."


24/11/11: Surveying immediate reaction to screening.

Wrightson notes initial opinion "mainly – and pleasingly – focused on the issue itself", then notes TV3 report of an electoral commission complaint; McElrea sends link to Karl du Fresne's blog post; Wrightson concludes the debate "mainly focused a little more on what the political response should be rather than party-specific. And thus far, no serious criticism of NZ on Air thankfully".


24/11/11: Jane Wrightson replies to documentary maker Bryan Bruce.

"Our only issue was the scheduling in Election week... We guard our reputation jealously... and we think the scheduling did threaten this. We couldn't ask TV3 to change the schedule, recognising it's their decision not ours, but we did make our disappointment about the scheduling and its potential impact on us known."


13/11/11: Walter to Wrightson – copy of Walter's response to complaint from Alastair Bell.

"... I categorically reject the suggestion that New Zealand on Air was in any way involved in the broadcaster's decision to screen the programme at this time...

"On the scheduling of the programme just days out from a general election (when the topic had indeed become an election issue), I fully share your concern...

"This is the first time that NZ on Air has been let down by a broadcaster in this way... TV3 has expressed its regret for having put us in this situation and has assured us that there will be no repeat of the problem. We are nevertheless investigating options to strengthen our broadcast covenants against the recurrence of such an incident."


15/12/11: Wrightson to Walter, McElrea summarising interview with Herald reporter John Drinnan on "reputed tensions" between NZOA and TV3, and political neutrality – with Drinnan specifically asking about Stephen McEltrea (Drinnan's column appeared the next day).

"I said our displeasure re the scheduling was a whole-of-Board view, also shared by me, that all members were appointed by the Minister of the day, and that as a crown entity we are completely neutral."


23/12/11: Wrightson letter to Sussan Turner.

"Although we were not party to the scheduling decision, we now stand accused of political bias...

"The Board has asked me to explore with you ways in which we could avoid a repetition of this situation, based on some form of understanding that due account will in future be taken of our concern not to be pulled into the political arena in this way. One suggestion is that any proposal to screen a politically sensitive programme immediately before a general or by-election first be discussed with NZ on Air. The period concerned is probably best defined as between the issue of writs and the day of voting.

"We should be grateful for your comments on this proposal."


********

© Scoop Media

 
 
 
Top Scoops Headlines

 

Gordon Campbell: On Betraying The Kurds

The Americans have now callously thrown the Kurds under the bus and created the ideal conditions for Islamic State to mount a comeback – all done so that Donald Trump can brag on the 2020 campaign trail that he brought the US troops home. How is the current fighting likely to proceed? More>>

ALSO:

Expert Comment: Online Voting Won’t Mean More Engagement

“Overseas experience is that online voting tends to be popular with those who are already likely to vote and who have high levels of digital literacy. It does little to help add new people to the voter pool, and this holds even for young voters.”More>>

ALSO:

Gordon Campbell: On The Saudis (Not) Getting Away With Murder

On October 2nd last year, the dissident journalist Jamal Khashoggi was murdered inside the Saudi Embassy in Istanbul, by a hit squad of assassins acting on the orders of the Saudi Crown Prince, Mohammad bin Salman. More>>

Ellen Rykers on The Dig: Community Conservation – The Solution To The Biodiversity Crisis?

It’s increasingly clear that a government agency alone cannot combat the biodiversity crisis successfully. These grass-roots initiatives are a growing resource in the conservation toolbox. More>>

ALSO:

Gordon Campbell: On The Saudi Oil Refinery Crisis

So the US and the Saudis claim to have credible evidence that those Weapons of Oil Destruction came from Iran, their current bogey now that Saddam Hussein is no longer available. Evidently, the world has learned nothing from the invasion of Iraq in 2003 when dodgy US intel was wheeled out to justify the invasion of Iraq, thereby giving birth to ISIS and causing the deaths of hundreds of thousands of people. More>>

ALSO: