Syndicated by: LiveNews.co.nz - On this NZ On Air fiasco: The saddest thing in this awful affair is that the National Party's response via its appointment to the board of New Zealand On Air is not one of how to advance a cross-party accord on creating real solutions to child poverty – but rather how to muzzle those members of the fourth estate who seek to report the reality of what's happening to this country.

While the politicians are away still on holiday this is an excellent time to make note of some important issues already rising in 2012.

This week let's discuss - Political appointments by the National Party where convention suggests Governmental appointments should be the rule.

We're talking about the appointment of National Party leader and Prime Minister John Key’s electorate chairman Stephen McElrea to the board of New Zealand On Air.

For the record McElrea is also the National Party’s northern region deputy chairman.

This week, via Scoop, political broadcaster Tom Frewen revealed the funding agency New Zealand on Air was considering changing its rules to prevent publically-funded political content screening during election campaigns. Click here for Tom Frewen's work on Scoop

NZ On Air's intention to censor followed an email exchange between McElrea and the NZ On Air board chair after TV3 screened investigator Bryan Bruce's documentary Inside Child Poverty days before the 2011 general election.

Let's have a look at a small section of that documentary.

Bryan Bruce's doco, Child Poverty in NZ on Ondemand.tv3.co.nz

To me, the documentary was not targeting the National Party, but rather policy that has failed New Zealanders, our most vulnerable people, our children.

It was a documentary that put forward an argument, a theory of why child poverty is problematic in New Zealand, attempted to identify its root causes, and laid a foundation upon which we could all debate how to create solutions to this scourge that faces contemporary New Zealand society.

Why then would the National Party's envoy to NZ On Air complain that the documentary should not have screened.

When, in 2011, McElrea's appointment was publicly announced... many of us voiced concern that a political appointment of a very active party stalwart would hardly lead to independent governance on the board of NZ On Air. Were our concerns warranted?

The expectation was then, that if McElrea was appointed to ensure the National Party's interests were protected from potential investigative programmes being funded via New Zealand On Air - then funding would dry up for documentaries, current affairs programmes that explore issue of public and national interest.

If the culture of timidity that is currently apparent within NZ On Air continues to cement in, if its board continues to react to the pressures applied by the National Party's appointee/s, then the only programmes and documentaries that will likely be funded will be those that do not critically analyse the impact of political policy on this nation's peoples, environment, and business economy.

What concerns most here is not that the documentary screened at a politically sensitive time, 3News should be applauded for that decision, but rather that the political reaction has been motivated by self-interest rather than the public good.

Who loses in this issue? Not the National Party – it clearly won the 2011 election with a huge proportion of the popular vote. No, it is the children who live in poverty in this country. It is the children that lose here, robbed of opportunity through equality, denied the fundamental human right to have the means before them to reach their potential.

The saddest thing in this awful affair is that the National Party's response via its appointment to the board of New Zealand On Air is not one of how to advance a cross-party accord on creating real solutions to child poverty – but rather how to muzzle those members of the fourth estate who seek to report the reality of what's happening to this country.

And that, is a shameful reaction to a shameful situation.

Other issues we will likely explore in coming weeks include:

• The Food Bill.


• The judicial airing of whether Chinese interests are able to purchase the Crafar Farms.

And that's the state of it for this week.

This report is syndicated by: LiveNews.co.nz

Despite repeatedly stating that a key demand was an end to administrative detention, and that no partial offer would be accepted, an Israeli offer was yesterday accepted by the Higher Committee for the Hunger Strikers on behalf of the prisoners. Although Israel has agreed to release 19 prisoners from solitary confinement - several of whom have been in isolation for more than ten years - and to lift the ban on family visits for prisoners from Gaza, the agreement states only that administrative detention will not be ‘renewed’ automatically and that after six months, the prisoner must be released, or charged. Current administrative detainees will be released, or charged, at the end of their current sentence. (video by Julie Webb-Pullman - Nakba Vox-pops with Gazans)More>>

REPORTS ON THE STRIKE END:

• Prisoner Interview - Julie Webb-Pullman: Jalal Saker’s Story
• Government Media Office - Victory of the prisoners in the Battle of the Empty Stomachs
• Palestinian Information Center - Palestinian prisoners win battle of empty stomachs
• International News Links - Palestinian prisoners, Israel make deal to end hunger strike
• Israel Security Agency - Terrorist Activity by Security Prisoners
• Israel Prison Service - End of the Hunger Strike

Julie Webb-Pullman: Gaza.Scoop.ps – Real Time News From Gaza

• Photo Essay: Al Jundy on Day 25 of the Battle of the Empty Stomachs
• Palestinians Favour A Diplomatic Solution, Says Haniyeh
• Hundreds Of Gaza Women March To Join Hunger Strikers Rally
Photo essay – 20th day of the Battle of the Empty Stomachs
• May Day In Gaza
• Protest Tent in Support of Hunger Striking Prisoners Relocates in Gaza City